Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the criticism from Go champion Ke Jie regarding children's programming courses, labeling them as a "tax on intelligence" and suggesting they are largely ineffective for children [2]. Group 1: Parental Perspectives - Many parents enroll their children in programming classes due to anxiety about their children's future, rather than a genuine belief in the educational value of these courses [4]. - Some parents view these classes as a temporary daycare solution, allowing them to relieve stress while their children engage in activities [4]. - A segment of parents believes that programming classes can provide a shortcut for academic advancement through competitions, particularly in major cities [4]. Group 2: Educators' Opinions - Former and current programming instructors express agreement with Ke Jie, stating that many children's programming courses are misleading and do not provide real benefits to children [6]. - Instructors highlight that the focus on competition and the high costs associated with these courses contribute to the perception of them being a "tax on intelligence" [6]. - There is a consensus among educators that unless a child has a genuine interest and talent in programming, these courses may lead to disinterest and frustration [6]. Group 3: Broader Discussions - The controversy surrounding children's programming courses stems from a lack of clarity among parents about their motivations for enrolling their children, coupled with institutions capitalizing on parental anxiety [8]. - Some commentators suggest that children would benefit more from classes that enhance reading and logical expression skills rather than programming [9]. - The article concludes that investing in foundational subjects like language and mathematics, or fostering genuine interests, is more beneficial than enrolling children in potentially unproductive programming courses [9].