Core Viewpoint - The ongoing debate between Gree and Xiaomi highlights the importance of fair comparisons in technology, with Gree's executive emphasizing that outdated products should not be compared to new innovations from competitors [1][7]. Group 1: Gree's Position - Gree's executive, Zhu Lei, criticized the comparison of Gree's 2021 products with Xiaomi's 2025 new models, arguing that such comparisons are unreasonable [1][7]. - Gree claims that Xiaomi currently only offers entry-level products in the central air conditioning sector, specifically mentioning their wind pipe machine [1][8]. - Gree's recent innovations, such as the internationally certified reversible distributed air conditioning system and constant temperature dehumidification system, have no direct counterparts in Xiaomi's lineup [1][8]. Group 2: Xiaomi's Response - Xiaomi's public relations manager, Wang Hua, suggested that the analysis and interpretations from netizens should be considered, indicating a level of engagement with public opinion [2]. - The emphasis on "core technology" in manufacturing suggests that poetic comparisons are insufficient for demonstrating technological advancements [9].

Core Viewpoint - The discussion surrounding the comparison between Gree Electric Appliances and Xiaomi's air conditioning products is deemed unreasonable, as Gree's older models are being compared to Xiaomi's new entry-level products [1]. Group 1: Company Positioning - Gree Electric emphasizes that its technology is sound and should be transparently presented, avoiding indirect comparisons that mislead consumers [1]. - The company highlights that Xiaomi currently only offers entry-level ducted air conditioning units, while Gree has advanced products that have received international certifications [1]. - Gree asserts that it is unnecessary to compare its high-end central air conditioning systems with Xiaomi's basic offerings, reinforcing its market leadership [1]. Group 2: Industry Context - The manufacturing industry values tangible results and core technology, suggesting that superficial marketing tactics, such as poetry, do not equate to genuine technological advancement [1].