智能影像解决方案业务

Search documents
上半年亏损超7亿 “智驾芯片第一股”黑芝麻智能业绩掉队
Zhong Guo Jing Ying Bao· 2025-09-11 13:55
Core Viewpoint - Black Sesame Intelligence, known as the "first stock of smart driving chips" in China, continues to face significant losses despite reporting a revenue increase for the first half of 2025, raising concerns about its financial health and strategic direction [2][4]. Financial Performance - In the first half of 2025, Black Sesame Intelligence reported revenue of 253 million yuan, a year-on-year increase of 40.38%, while its net profit plummeted to -762 million yuan, a decline of 169.01% compared to a profit of 1.105 billion yuan in the same period of 2024 [4][5]. - The company's gross margin for the first half of 2025 was 24.79%, down from 50.00% in the same period of 2024, indicating a significant decline in profitability [7][8]. Product and Market Development - The revenue growth in the first half of 2025 was attributed to increased sales of advanced driver assistance products and solutions, with successful mass production deliveries based on the A1000 series chips to several major automotive manufacturers [5][6]. - Despite the losses, Black Sesame Intelligence is expanding into new sectors, including robotics and rail transit safety, with a recent announcement of entering the rail transit proactive safety market [10][11]. R&D and Investment - The company reported R&D expenditures of 618.1 million yuan in the first half of 2025, a decrease of 10.1% from the previous year, with R&D spending accounting for 244% of its revenue [9]. - Black Sesame Intelligence is actively pursuing partnerships and investments in the robotics sector, indicating a strategic move to diversify its business and enhance its market presence [10][11]. Competitive Landscape - The company faces increasing competition in the smart driving chip market, with its revenue growth rate slowing down compared to peers like Horizon Robotics, which reported a revenue increase of 67.6% in the same period [6][8]. - The decline in gross margin is attributed to increased costs associated with expanding application scenarios for its driver assistance products, as well as competitive pricing pressures in the industry [8][9].