Core Viewpoint - The collaboration between Dongchedi and CCTV to conduct "intelligent driving" scenario tests on over 30 popular car models has yielded mixed results, highlighting the need for more rigorous and transparent testing in the automotive industry [1][2]. Group 1: Testing and Industry Response - Some car manufacturers have publicly criticized Dongchedi's testing, claiming it lacks professionalism and rigor, while others in the automotive media have also raised concerns about the validity of the tests [2]. - Dongchedi's tests are seen as the first public assessment of multiple models under realistic road conditions, contrasting with traditional closed-environment crash tests that do not adequately reflect the risks associated with autonomous driving [2][3]. - The automotive industry is urged to prioritize consumer safety over competitive marketing, emphasizing the importance of conducting more open and professional real-world tests [3][4]. Group 2: Legislative and Regulatory Considerations - The article advocates for the establishment of stricter automotive safety regulations in China, similar to the TREAD Act in the U.S., which mandates manufacturers to disclose critical safety data [5]. - It argues that the automotive industry must balance technological advancement with consumer safety, suggesting that more stringent legislation could help elevate industry standards [5][6]. - The necessity for a reasonable liability framework is highlighted, as the current lack of accountability could lead to consumer safety being compromised [6]. Group 3: Consumer Safety and Industry Accountability - The automotive sector is called upon to place consumer safety at the forefront of its operations, as the consequences of failures in this industry can be life-threatening [6]. - The article stresses that merely showcasing user statistics is insufficient to prove the safety and reliability of autonomous driving systems [6].