Core Viewpoint - The case involves a legal dispute between Pop Mart and Qianhai Huan Technology over alleged copyright infringement and unfair competition regarding similar toy designs, highlighting the challenges of intellectual property protection in the creative industry [1][3]. Group 1: Company Overview - Pop Mart's "Night City" blind box series gained popularity due to its unique design and artistic style, leading to the emergence of a similar product, "Friend Island," produced by Qianhai Huan Technology [1]. - The legal team at Pop Mart identified that multiple designs in "Friend Island" closely resembled those in "Night City," with only minor modifications in features and attire [1]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - In October 2022, Pop Mart filed a lawsuit against Qianhai Huan Technology for copyright infringement and unfair competition in the Shenzhen Qianhai Cooperation Zone People's Court [3]. - A survey conducted by the court revealed that 61.8% of respondents mistakenly believed "Friend Island" was associated with Pop Mart, indicating consumer confusion [3]. - In December 2023, the court ruled that while there was no copyright infringement, Qianhai's product constituted unfair competition, resulting in a compensation order of over 250,000 yuan [3]. - Qianhai Huan Technology appealed the decision, arguing that "Friend Island" was an independent creation and that the court's survey was a legal error, but the Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court upheld the original ruling in July 2025 [3].

策划/林晔晗 苏依绚 董柳 统筹/陈虹伶 贾蓉慧 鄢敏 执行/全小晴 曾洁赟 许晓琪 文/鄢敏 通讯员 全小晴 图/记者 邓鼎园 站在热闹的潮玩门店，看着排队购买文创产品的顾客，北京泡泡玛特文化创意有限公司门店有关负责人 林某不禁感慨："公司发展前景越来越看好，离不开法治的保障。"提及去年在深圳法院审理的著作权纠 纷案，林某向记者表示，"这份判决带给我们的不仅是胜诉，更是创作的信心。" 案件缘起于两款潮玩人偶"撞脸"了。 "没有作品抄袭，就合法吗？"这是北京泡泡玛特文化创意有限公司诉深圳市前海欢某科技有限公司著作 权侵权及不正当竞争纠纷案的焦点问题，同时暴露出文创产业发展中面临的一大难点：如何为盲盒玩偶 类产品知识产权保护划定边界？ 案件回顾：盲盒人偶"撞脸" 故事的"主人公"是一款名为"夜某城"的系列人偶盲盒，来自北京泡泡玛特文化创意有限公司（以下简 称"泡泡玛特公司"），一上线便凭借独特设计和艺术风格成为市场热门。 两个看起来相似，但细节存在差异的潮玩人偶，构成仿冒吗？为回答这个关键问题，前海法院审判团队 走进潮玩展随机邀请消费者和经营者填写调查问卷。 "您好，麻烦看看这个形象，您觉得它可能出自哪个品牌或 ...