Core Viewpoint - The recent joint notification by the Ministry of Finance, the Financial Regulatory Administration, the National Intellectual Property Administration, and the National Copyright Administration aims to strengthen the standardized management of intellectual property asset evaluation, enhance the ability to utilize and protect intellectual property, and promote the release of intellectual property asset value, thereby accelerating the construction of a strong intellectual property nation [1][2]. Group 1: Importance of Intellectual Property Asset Evaluation - Intellectual property is recognized as a significant intangible asset, and its evaluation and protection are complementary processes [1]. - Objective and fair asset evaluation can provide a pricing basis for patents, trademarks, copyrights, and other intellectual properties, facilitating market recognition and successful transformation of innovative results [3]. Group 2: Requirements for Asset Evaluation Institutions - Asset evaluation institutions must possess relevant professional competence, quality control capabilities, and risk management abilities when undertaking intellectual property asset evaluation [1]. - Institutions are required to strictly adhere to laws, regulations, and asset evaluation standards, ensuring independent, objective, and fair assessments without preset values [1][2]. Group 3: Supervision and Self-Regulation - The notification emphasizes the need for enhanced supervision and self-regulation of intellectual property asset evaluations [2]. - The China Asset Evaluation Association is tasked with strengthening self-regulation and professional guidance for institutions engaged in intellectual property asset evaluation, improving the evaluation standards, and enhancing the professional service capabilities of asset evaluation institutions [2].

Core Viewpoint - The recent notification issued by four government departments aims to standardize the evaluation of intellectual property assets, emphasizing the importance of professional assessment in the utilization and protection of intellectual property [1][2]. Group 1: Regulatory Framework - The notification outlines that asset evaluations related to intellectual property must comply with relevant laws and regulations, allowing parties to voluntarily commission evaluations for economic activities involving intellectual property [1][2]. - It mandates that asset evaluation institutions must possess the necessary professional competence, quality control, and risk management capabilities to conduct intellectual property asset evaluations [1]. Group 2: Supervision and Collaboration - The four departments will guide and regulate intellectual property asset evaluation work, establishing a collaborative mechanism for supervision and management [2]. - There will be a focus on timely statistics and disclosure of evaluation business conditions, along with the creation of a transparent and efficient data service platform for intellectual property asset evaluations [2]. Group 3: Quality Improvement and Training - The China Asset Evaluation Association will enhance self-regulation and professional guidance for institutions engaged in intellectual property asset evaluations, aiming to improve the evaluation standards and training for professionals in this field [2]. - The notification encourages collaboration among asset evaluation institutions, intellectual property service agencies, copyright registration bodies, and commercial banks to enhance the quality and efficiency of evaluations [2].

Core Viewpoint - The notification aims to standardize the evaluation of intellectual property (IP) assets, enhance the management of IP asset evaluation, and promote the effective utilization and protection of IP assets in China [3][4]. Group 1: Role of Asset Evaluation in IP - Asset evaluation plays a crucial role in determining the value of IP, which is essential for its operation and transformation. It should facilitate the orderly flow and optimal allocation of IP resources throughout the entire chain of creation, utilization, protection, management, and service [3]. - The evaluation process must comply with relevant laws and regulations, and parties involved can voluntarily commission evaluation institutions for IP asset evaluations [3]. Group 2: Standardization of IP Asset Evaluation Practices - Evaluation institutions must possess the necessary professional competence, quality control, and risk management capabilities when conducting IP asset evaluations [4]. - Institutions are required to adhere strictly to laws and evaluation standards, ensuring independent, objective, and fair assessments without preset values influencing the outcomes [4]. - There is an emphasis on the education and training of professionals in IP asset evaluation to enhance service quality and reduce the financial burden on enterprises [4][5]. Group 3: Supervision and Self-Regulation of IP Asset Evaluation - Relevant authorities, including the Ministry of Finance and the National Intellectual Property Administration, will guide and regulate IP asset evaluation, establishing a collaborative mechanism for effective oversight [6]. - The establishment of a transparent and efficient data service platform for IP asset evaluation is encouraged, along with the monitoring of significant and unusual evaluation reports [6]. Group 4: Responsibilities of Stakeholders in IP Asset Evaluation - All parties involved, including evaluation institutions, clients, and financial institutions, must conduct evaluations in compliance with laws and regulations to foster a healthy market environment [7]. - Clients are responsible for providing accurate information necessary for evaluations and must not interfere with the evaluation results [7]. - Financial institutions should consider the relationship between loan amounts and evaluation values when utilizing evaluation results for IP pledge financing [7].