Workflow
矿浆
icon
Search documents
6名学生遇难事故,涉事企业回应三大焦点问题
第一财经· 2025-07-26 11:26
2025.07. 26 本文字数:1171,阅读时长大约2分钟 来源 | 澎湃新闻 东北大学6名学生在中国黄金内蒙古矿业选矿厂遇难事故持续引发关注。 7月23日10时20分许,东北大学6名学生在中国黄金集团内蒙古矿业有限公司乌努格吐山铜钼矿选矿 厂(下称内蒙古矿业)参观学习浮选工艺过程中,因格栅板脱落坠入浮选槽,均遇难,另有1名老师 受伤。 以下是王瑞对相关问题的答复。 浮选机是否存在机械伤害? 中国黄金集团内蒙古矿业有限公司选矿部部长王瑞:安装在浮选机上部的传动电机通过浮选机驱动中 轴带动底部的叶轮旋转,搅动矿浆循环,使底部矿浆向上流动。底部叶轮上方有端板,同时定子将叶 轮四周包围,叶轮端板上方无其他运动部件,不易发生机械伤害。 矿浆是否存在毒性? 中国黄金集团内蒙古矿业有限公司选矿部部长王瑞:乌山铜钼矿的矿石中主要成分有黄铁矿、黄铜 矿、辉铜矿、辉钼矿、石英等多种矿物,经多家研究单位多次检测并无有毒物质。生产中在磨矿作业 添加pH值调整剂浓度约8%的石灰乳,使矿浆pH值保持9左右;在浮选作业(320m3浮选机中)添 加复合高效安全捕收剂SFJ:10~13g/t、钼捕收剂ZM-M6:8~10g/t以及起泡剂 ...
事关6名大学生的安全事故,能叫溺亡吗?
Hu Xiu· 2025-07-25 01:04
Group 1 - A tragic incident occurred where six junior students from Northeast University fell into a flotation tank during an internship at Zhongjin Gold, resulting in their deaths [1][2] - The flotation tank is described as having a significant vertical height, making it difficult for individuals to escape once they fall in [15] - The flotation slurry contains corrosive substances and heavy metal ions, posing severe health risks upon contact, including skin burns and respiratory issues [19][23] Group 2 - The incident highlights a lack of safety measures, as the grid plate above the flotation tank was not adequately secured, despite previous safety concerns raised by students [28][30] - The company had previously announced a goal of achieving zero accidents in the flotation workshop by 2024, indicating a commitment to safety that was not reflected in practice [31] - The recent replacement of the grid plate, which should have lasted for ten years, raises questions about the quality of maintenance and inspection practices within the company [34][36] Group 3 - The incident reflects broader issues within high-risk industries, where safety protocols may be overlooked, leading to preventable tragedies [40][42] - The perception of mining and mineral processing as high-risk fields is reinforced by this incident, potentially affecting student interest and recruitment in these areas [45][46] - The company’s apparent indifference to safety concerns may suggest a troubling attitude towards the welfare of students and interns [47]