财达同花顺
Search documents
财达证券投行业务“偏科”:债券承销火热股权业务冰凉连续四年“交白卷”储备为0|券商半年报
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-09-22 12:05
出品:新浪财经上市公司研究院 屡遭监管 9月份,海南证监局公布对财达证券海南分公司前员工敖义的行政处罚决定书。2019年12月至2020年7月,敖义私下接受客户余某蛟委托,登录余某蛟指定的普通账户进行交易,交易金额约59 根据《证券法》第二百一十条规定,证券公司的从业人员私下接受客户委托买卖证券,没有违法所得的,处以五十万元以下的罚款并给予警告。违规 "代客操盘"是券商重点监管的违法行为,财 今年7月份,财达证券APP"财达财日昇"(版本3.65,当快软件园)因"违法违规收集使用个人信息"被点名。 事实上,早在2024年12月,财达证券旗下"财达同花顺"(版本V9.01.34)、"财达财日昇"(版本3.60)存在违规收集个人信息问题,且未在限期内整改,被 河北省通信管理局予以公开通报 责任编辑:公司观察 2025年上半年,财达证券实现营业收入12.39亿元,同比增长13.39%,利润总额 4.7亿元,同比增长55.33%,归属于母公司股东的净利润3.75亿元,同比增长55.64%。 细分业务看,财达证券经纪业务手续费净收入、投行业务手续费净收入、自营投资收入(自营投资收入=投资净收益+公允价值变动-对联营企业 ...
财达证券投行业务“偏科”:债券承销火热 股权业务冰凉连续四年“交白卷”储备为0|券商半年报
Xin Lang Zheng Quan· 2025-09-22 10:37
Core Points - The 42 listed securities firms in China reported a total operating revenue of 251.9 billion yuan for the first half of 2025, representing a year-on-year increase of 31% [1] - The net profit attributable to shareholders reached 104 billion yuan, marking a 65% year-on-year growth [1] Group 1: Financial Performance - The total operating revenue of the 42 listed securities firms was 251.9 billion yuan, with a year-on-year growth of 31% [1] - The net profit attributable to shareholders was 104 billion yuan, reflecting a 65% increase compared to the previous year [1] - Among the firms, the highest revenue was reported by CITIC Securities at 33.04 billion yuan, with a growth rate of 20.44% [3] Group 2: Individual Firm Performance - The performance of individual firms varied significantly, with some firms like Guotai Junan Securities showing a revenue increase of 77.71% [4] - Conversely, firms such as Zheshang Securities and Zhongyuan Securities reported declines in revenue, with decreases of 23.66% and 23.14% respectively [3][4] - The investment banking segment of Caida Securities showed a significant reliance on bond underwriting, with no equity underwriting projects in the last four years [7] Group 3: Regulatory Issues - Caida Securities faced regulatory scrutiny due to past violations, including unauthorized trading by a former employee, leading to administrative penalties [8] - The firm also encountered issues with its app for illegal collection and use of personal information, which resulted in public notifications from regulatory authorities [8]