澳方刚扭亏为盈就变脸？1999年，澳大利亚的北领地政府面对一片亏损的达尔文港，最终决定将其以5.06亿澳元（约24亿人民币）的价格租赁给中资岚桥集 团，租期99年，相当于将这个烫手山芋交给中国人。那时，谁也没想到，这个由澳方自己经营得一团糟的港口，竟然在中国的管理下焕发了新生。十年间， 岚桥集团砸钱改善基础设施，优化管理，拓展客户，硬生生将这个一直处于亏损中的港口拉回了盈利轨道。 然而，就在港口刚刚实现扭亏为盈的关键时刻，澳大利亚总理阿尔巴尼斯却突然翻脸。2024年1月28日，他公然表态要将达尔文港收回，理由竟然是符合国 家利益。需要指出的是，这份租约是通过公开竞标拿下的，完全符合澳大利亚的法律和市场规则，属于明确的商业承诺。然而现在，才履约十年，澳方就想 提前88年撕毁合同，这种操作简直堪比你帮邻居把荒地种成良田，丰收时他直接锁门把你赶走，这一幕令人咋舌。 芒果粉序这事儿真是让人活久见！全球各国都在忙着合作共赢，唯独澳大利亚偏要逆流而上，做出让人大跌眼镜的操作：中国出资24亿人民币帮助盘活达尔 文港，结果港口刚刚盈利，澳方就宣告要收回。这一波摘桃子式的毁约操作，连俄罗斯媒体都看傻了：这不是什么护主权，简直就 ...

【文/观察者网 阮佳琪】 2025年澳大利亚大选期间，执政党与反对党接连大打"中国牌"，拿出售给中企的达尔文港说事。当时，在得知对手计划宣布"收回"达尔文港的竞 选主张后，工党大选候选人的阿尔巴尼斯也匆忙联系澳媒，抛出了完全相同的表态。 他说，"我认为港口应该重新回到澳大利亚手中，这正是我们正在推进的事，目前相关商业谈判仍在进行，我们致力于确保港口重回澳大利亚掌 控。" 尽管澳方多轮审查均表明，将达尔文港出售给中企并不存在所谓"国家安全风险"，但阿尔巴尼斯仍宣称，这笔交易不符合澳大利亚国家利益。 他还将矛头指向前任政府，"我要提醒各位，这笔交易得到了前联盟党政府向北领地政府提供的财政激励，才促成了港口出售。我们当时并不支持 这一决定，收回港口才符合国家利益。" 视频截图 2015年，澳大利亚北领地政府以5.06亿澳元的价格，将达尔文港99年的所有权出租给中资企业岚桥集团。 澳媒同时炒作称，针对澳方的无理诉求，中国驻澳大利亚大使肖千于本周三在年度记者会上表态，若达尔文港被"强制收回"，中方将"采取措施保 护中国企业的合法利益"。 据ABC报道，肖千说，"如果岚桥集团被迫退出该港口，我认为这也可能影响中国企业与澳 ...

Group 1 - The Chinese company Landbridge Group obtained the lease of Darwin Port through a public bidding process ten years ago, which complies with Australian laws and market rules [2] - Over the past decade, Landbridge Group has made significant investments in the infrastructure, management, and customer resources of Darwin Port, turning it from a loss-making entity to a profitable one, thus contributing positively to the local economy [2] - The lease agreement is a commercial contract, and it is hoped that the Australian government will objectively view the Darwin Port project and honor its contractual commitments [2] Group 2 - The Chinese government maintains a consistent and clear stance on the Ukraine issue, advocating for peace and dialogue, and has never provided lethal weapons to any party involved in the conflict [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Darwin Port project, operated by China's Landbridge Group, faces potential government termination and forced takeover in Australia, amidst ongoing political scrutiny and security reviews, raising concerns about the implications for foreign investment and bilateral relations with China [1][2][3][4] Group 1: Investment and Economic Impact - Landbridge Group has significantly improved the operational status of Darwin Port, turning losses into profits and investing over 83 million AUD in upgrades, resulting in a 95.7% increase in total gross tonnage of arriving vessels [1] - The Australian government's previous reviews have consistently found no national security risks associated with the Darwin Port lease, with the 2023 investigation concluding that there is no need to cancel or amend the lease [2][3] Group 2: Political and Diplomatic Context - The scrutiny of Darwin Port is heavily influenced by U.S. concerns, and the political climate in Australia has seen a rise in anti-China sentiment, which could jeopardize the stability of Australia-China relations [2][3] - If the Australian government unilaterally terminates the lease without legal justification, it would send a dangerous signal to global investors about the reliability of Australia's business environment, particularly in sectors requiring long-term investment [3] Group 3: Strategic and Military Considerations - The potential takeover of Darwin Port could symbolize a shift from commercial cooperation to military development, as the U.S. has been increasing its military presence in the region, which may compromise local economic development and public safety [4] - The politicalization of the port's management could undermine Australia's international reputation and strategic autonomy, as it would prioritize external military interests over domestic economic cooperation [4]

Group 1 - The Chinese ambassador emphasized that the lease agreement between the Chinese company Landbridge Group and the Northern Territory government for Darwin Port was obtained through a public bidding process and complies with Australian laws and market rules [1] - Over the past decade, Landbridge Group has made significant investments in maintaining and constructing infrastructure at Darwin Port, optimizing operations, and expanding customer resources, which has positively impacted the port's financial performance and contributed to local economic development [1] - The ambassador highlighted that the lease is a commercial contract and urged the Australian side to objectively view the Darwin Port project, fulfill its contractual commitments, and respect the autonomous decisions made by enterprises based on development needs [1] Group 2 - The relationship between China and Australia is described as a comprehensive strategic partnership, with mutual trust and cooperation being in the common interest of both parties [2] - The ambassador expressed hope that the Australian federal and Northern Territory governments would create a fair, transparent, and predictable business environment for Chinese enterprises operating in Australia [2]