Workflow
非色散位移单模光纤(G.652光纤或G.652单模光纤)
icon
Search documents
商务部公布对原产于美国的进口相关截止波长位移单模光纤反规避调查的裁决
Shang Wu Bu Wang Zhan· 2025-09-03 16:29
Core Viewpoint - The Ministry of Commerce of China has announced a ruling regarding the anti-circumvention investigation of cut-off shifted single-mode optical fibers imported from the United States, determining that such imports circumvent existing anti-dumping measures on non-dispersion shifted single-mode optical fibers [1][4]. Current Anti-Dumping Measures - The Ministry of Commerce imposed anti-dumping duties on non-dispersion shifted single-mode optical fibers from the U.S. starting April 22, 2011, with a five-year duration. This measure was extended in 2017 and again in 2023, with the applicable duty rates adjusted to between 33.3% and 78.2% for U.S. companies [2][3]. Product Description - Non-dispersion shifted single-mode optical fibers, also known as G.652 fibers, operate at wavelengths of 1310nm and 1550nm, with specific attenuation and dispersion characteristics. These fibers are widely used in high-speed, long-distance communications [3]. Anti-Circumvention Measures - The Ministry of Commerce has recommended adjustments to the tax scope, leading to the application of existing anti-dumping tax rates to the cut-off shifted single-mode optical fibers imported from the U.S. starting September 4, 2025 [4][5]. Tax Rates - The anti-dumping tax rates for specific U.S. companies are as follows: Corning Incorporated at 37.9%, OFS Fitel, LLC at 33.3%, and Draka Communications Americas, Inc. at 78.2%. Other U.S. companies will also face a rate of 78.2% [5]. Implementation Period - The anti-circumvention measures will be in effect from September 4, 2025, until April 21, 2028, coinciding with the expiration of the current anti-dumping measures on non-dispersion shifted single-mode optical fibers [6]. Review Process - Stakeholders may submit written applications for a review of the necessity to continue the anti-circumvention measures after a reasonable period during the implementation phase [7]. Legal Recourse - Parties dissatisfied with the anti-circumvention decision may apply for administrative reconsideration or file a lawsuit in court according to the relevant laws [8].