Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the collapse of Yongkun Gold, revealing it as a Ponzi scheme that promised unrealistic returns to investors, leading to significant financial losses for many individuals and employees involved [2][30]. Group 1: Company Overview - Yongkun Gold, operated by Zhejiang Yongkun Holding Co., Ltd., was established in 2014 and primarily engaged in gold jewelry sales and related financial services [2][3]. - The company promised annual returns of 5% to 9% on gold entrusted for storage, attracting substantial investments from individuals [3][30]. Group 2: Business Model and Operations - Yongkun Gold's business model included sales, custody, and repurchase of gold, which appeared straightforward but was fundamentally flawed [3][30]. - The company offered products that allowed investors to either cash out or receive points based on gold price fluctuations, creating an illusion of a risk-free investment [5][30]. - Despite warnings about high risks, the company continued to attract investments until its eventual collapse [6][7]. Group 3: Financial Implications and Impact - Reports indicate that Yongkun Gold's clients had approximately 8.57 billion yuan in insured gold, with a total gold inventory of 5,359 kg, valued at over 4.1 billion yuan [19][20]. - The collapse occurred amidst a significant rise in global gold prices, which increased nearly 3% from May 21 to the date of the article [20]. Group 4: Regulatory and Legal Issues - Yongkun Gold operated without the necessary financial licenses, violating regulations by engaging in gold custody and repurchase services [28][30]. - The company's operations were characterized by systemic risks and a lack of compliance, ultimately leading to its downfall [28][30]. Group 5: Key Individuals - The core figure behind Yongkun Gold is Wang Guohai, who has been linked to multiple companies, with many having been dissolved [24][27]. - Wang's background as an early gold analyst and trader contributed to the initial success of Yongkun Gold, but his business practices raised significant red flags [27][30].