Workflow
CyboInverter
icon
Search documents
继禾迈、昱能之后,德业股份在美遭逆变器专利侵权诉讼
Tai Mei Ti A P P· 2025-08-29 02:06
Core Viewpoint - CyboEnergy has filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Deye ESS Technology USA and Ningbo Deye Inverter Technology Co Ltd, alleging that Deye's microinverters infringe on its patented technologies related to solar inverters [1][18]. Group 1: Patent Details - The lawsuit involves two U.S. patents: US9331488B2, which covers smart and scalable power inverters, and US8786133B2, which pertains to the enclosure and message system of these inverters [1][4]. - Patent US9331488B2 was filed on June 29, 2012, and granted on May 3, 2016, with an expiration date of December 17, 2034. It focuses on a hardware architecture that integrates multiple DC input channels and centralized control [2][4]. - Patent US8786133B2 was filed on July 15, 2010, and granted on July 22, 2014, expiring on June 7, 2032. It addresses issues related to traditional centralized DC-AC inverters, offering a more efficient and reliable solution for distributed energy integration [4][20]. Group 2: Products Involved - The products in question include Deye's SUN series microinverters: SUN600G3, SUN800G3, SUN1000G3, SUN1300G3, SUN1600G3, and SUN2000G3, which range in power from 300W to 2000W and support various communication methods [1][9]. - Deye's microinverters are designed to optimize power generation at the module level, providing features such as remote monitoring and quick shutdown capabilities [9][11]. Group 3: Legal Proceedings - CyboEnergy claims that Deye knowingly sold and provided products that infringe on its patents, actively promoting their use through various marketing materials [18][19]. - The lawsuit seeks several remedies, including a determination of infringement, compensation for damages, and a permanent injunction against future infringement [19][20]. - There are potential disputes regarding the specifics of the technology used in Deye's products and whether they indeed infringe on CyboEnergy's patents, as the initial complaint lacks detailed technical analysis [20][21].