Workflow
EchoNext人工智能筛查工具
icon
Search documents
AI发现特定心脏病准确率已超过人类专家?心电图迎来技术飞跃
第一财经· 2025-07-22 15:19
Core Insights - Early detection of structural heart disease is crucial for improving prognosis, but widespread screening is limited by the cost and accessibility of imaging tools like echocardiography [1][2] - The recent study published in Nature demonstrates that an AI tool named EchoNext can independently analyze ECG data to accurately identify patients with structural heart disease, outperforming human experts [1][3] Group 1: AI Tool Development - EchoNext was developed to analyze routine ECG data, effectively screening for patients who may require further echocardiography, thus optimizing medical resource allocation [1][2] - The AI model was trained on over 1.2 million pairs of ECG and echocardiography data from 230,000 patients, enabling it to detect various forms of structural heart disease [2] Group 2: Performance Metrics - EchoNext identified over 7,500 high-risk patients from a cohort of 85,000 who had not previously undergone echocardiography, achieving a diagnostic accuracy of 77.3% for structural heart disease [2][3] - In a comparative study, human cardiologists had an accuracy of 64% without AI assistance, which improved to 69.2% with AI support, but still fell short of EchoNext's performance [3] Group 3: Clinical Implications - Structural heart disease affects millions globally and includes conditions like valvular heart disease and heart failure, with early detection linked to reduced mortality and healthcare costs [4] - The integration of ECG and AI could revolutionize screening practices, allowing clinicians to better determine which patients should undergo echocardiography [4] Group 4: Future Directions - Future heart disease risk prediction may benefit from multimodal models that incorporate data from chest X-rays, lab tests, and ECGs for comprehensive risk assessment [4] - Challenges remain in the integration and adoption of AI models in clinical settings, necessitating further optimization and refinement [5]
Nature重磅:AI利用常规心电图发现结构性心脏病,准确率超越人类心脏病专家
生物世界· 2025-07-21 08:15
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the increasing prevalence of Structural Heart Disease (SHD) and highlights the development of an AI screening tool, EchoNext, which can accurately identify patients with SHD from standard electrocardiograms (ECGs) [1][4][10]. Group 1: Overview of Structural Heart Disease - Structural Heart Disease (SHD) includes conditions affecting heart valves, walls, or chambers, impacting millions globally [1]. - Early detection of SHD can reduce mortality, treatment costs, and improve quality of life, but many patients are diagnosed late due to the lack of affordable screening tests [2]. Group 2: Development of EchoNext - Researchers from Columbia University and NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital developed EchoNext, an AI tool that analyzes ECG data to identify SHD patients with higher accuracy than human experts [3][4]. - EchoNext aims to provide a cost-effective method to determine which patients require further expensive echocardiogram examinations [7]. Group 3: Performance and Validation of EchoNext - The AI model was trained on over 1.2 million ECG-echocardiogram pairs from 230,000 patients to detect various forms of SHD [10]. - In a validation study across four healthcare systems, EchoNext demonstrated high accuracy in identifying SHD, including conditions like heart failure and valvular disease [12]. Group 4: Clinical Application and Results - In a study involving nearly 85,000 patients who had not undergone echocardiograms, EchoNext identified over 7,500 individuals (9%) at high risk for undiagnosed SHD [13]. - Among those identified as high-risk, 55% underwent their first echocardiogram, with nearly 75% diagnosed with SHD, indicating a positive rate twice that of those without AI assistance [14]. Group 5: Comparison with Human Experts - A comparison of EchoNext with 13 cardiologists showed that while AI assistance improved the accuracy of human assessments, EchoNext outperformed human experts with an accuracy of 77.3%, sensitivity of 72.6%, and specificity of 80.7% [16][17].