Core Viewpoint - The emergence of AI-generated figurine images has been significantly influenced by Google's recent release of the Gemini 2.5 Flash Image model, dubbed "Nano Banana," which has been praised for its user-friendly operation and high-quality output [2][5]. Group 1: AI Model Comparisons - Following the launch of "Nano Banana," competitors such as ByteDance's Seedream 4.0 and Shenshu Technology's Vidu Q1 quickly entered the market, indicating a rapid escalation in the AI image generation sector [5][8]. - Seedream 4.0 has reportedly topped the rankings in text-to-image and image editing categories, surpassing Google's Nano Banana in both fields [8]. - In a comparative test, Nano Banana produced a more realistic figurine image of a long-haired kitten, demonstrating superior understanding of figurine aesthetics compared to Seedream 4.0 and Vidu Q1, which struggled with material representation [11][14]. Group 2: Performance Insights - Seedream 4.0 excelled in generating a stunning final image from a complex prompt involving a figurine in a realistic setting, while Nano Banana required additional prompts to improve its output [14]. - In a test involving family dynamics, Seedream 4.0 interpreted the prompt favorably, while Nano Banana added unexpected elements, showcasing differences in understanding user intent [18]. - All three AI models displayed unique strengths and weaknesses, with Nano Banana achieving extreme realism, Seedream 4.0 demonstrating good comprehension, and Vidu Q1 providing balanced performance across tasks [20]. Group 3: Industry Implications - The advancements in these AI models represent a significant leap in capabilities, including improved understanding, faster output times, and higher image quality, moving closer to the ideal of a productivity tool [23].