Core Insights - The article discusses the rapid advancements in AI 3D modeling tools, highlighting their potential to transform the design process from lengthy manual modeling to quick generation through simple inputs [2][3][37] - A comparative evaluation of several leading AI 3D modeling products is conducted to assess their performance in terms of generation quality, usability, and practical application potential [3][5][37] Group 1: AI 3D Modeling Tools Overview - Six representative AI 3D modeling tools were selected for evaluation: Hitems3D v1.5, 混元3D V3.0, Tripo, Hyper3D Gen-2, Meshy 6 Preview, and Genie (Luma AI) [5] - The tools come from various teams and ecosystems, ranging from large corporations to startups, illustrating the diverse landscape of the current AI 3D sector [5] Group 2: Evaluation Criteria and Methodology - The evaluation was conducted from the perspective of young, average users, focusing on practical usability and aesthetic appeal [4] - The assessment involved a series of tasks with increasing complexity to test the models' foundational generation capabilities and their stability in handling complex tasks [8][11] Group 3: Performance Results - All products demonstrated the ability to reconstruct the overall structure of the models, with 混元3D showing the most accurate facial details [12][18] - In terms of texture quality, Hitems3D and Tripo excelled in color and material fidelity, accurately reproducing details from reference images [13][22] - The models generally performed well in simpler tasks but struggled with complex details and facial features, often requiring significant manual post-processing to meet commercial standards [39][40] Group 4: Future Outlook - AI 3D modeling capabilities are advancing beyond mere novelty, showing potential for practical applications in design workflows, significantly reducing the time required for initial modeling tasks [37] - Despite impressive efficiency, there remains a gap in quality and detail handling, particularly in facial features and complex structures, indicating room for further development in the technology [38][39]