Core Points - The FIFA Global Citizen Education Fund has opened grant applications for grassroots organizations focused on K-12 education, with applications accepted until December 31, 2025 [1][3] - The Fund aims to raise USD $100 million to expand access to quality education and sports, with MetLife Foundation recognized as a founding donor after contributing USD $9 million [2][3] - Grants will range from USD $50,000 to $250,000, with approximately 150 organizations expected to be awarded, serving between 500 and 10,000 individuals [3] Company Overview - MetLife, Inc. is a leading financial services company providing insurance, annuities, employee benefits, and asset management, operating in over 40 markets globally [4] - MetLife Foundation focuses on driving inclusive economic mobility through grants aligned with economic empowerment, financial health, and resilient communities, having contributed over $1 billion since its inception in 1976 [5]

Group 1: Market Overview - U.S. investors are facing challenges including high tech stock valuations, hawkish Federal Reserve commentary, and unpredictable tariff policies from the Trump administration [1] - Despite Nvidia's strong earnings, the market experienced a sell-off, indicating potential volatility ahead [2] - High-quality international stocks have emerged as a refuge from U.S. market fluctuations [2] Group 2: Shinhan Financial Group - Shinhan Financial Group, a South Korean banking conglomerate, has a market cap of $25.5 billion and reported strong growth in interest income and net interest margins in Q3 2025 [3][5] - The company is trading at a Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio of 7.94 and a Price-to-Book (P/B) value of 0.5, with a dividend yield exceeding 3% [5] Group 3: POSCO Holdings - POSCO Holdings, valued at $16 billion, is transitioning from traditional steel manufacturing to lithium battery production, which offers higher margins [6][8] - The company has secured deals for lithium extraction in the U.S. and mining operations in Australia and Argentina, yet it trades at 14 times forward earnings and 0.4 times book value [6] Group 4: PLDT Inc. - PLDT Inc., the largest telecommunications company in the Philippines, offers a range of services and has developed the popular PayMaya app, now rebranded as Maya [9] - The stock trades at 7.5 times forward earnings and 1.2 times sales, with a dividend yield over 7%, presenting a potential buying opportunity after a recent drop [11] Group 5: United Microelectronics Corp. - United Microelectronics Corp. is a key player in the semiconductor foundry market, with a market share of 5% and major clients including Texas Instruments and Intel [12][14] - The stock is trading at 14 times forward earnings and 2.4 times sales, below industry averages, and has shown improved earnings performance in Q3 2025 [14]

这些问题的根本，也是人身险发展底层逻辑正在变迁。传统模式本身并没有错，但这个时代的消费者需 求变了、市场环境变了、保险机构的职能也在变化……当一切变化综合叠加，最终结果就是：队伍整体 专业能力与客户日益综合化、个性化的保障需求出现显著的"中位数错配"。 那么代理人渠道的未来应该怎么走？经过这些年的不懈探索，人们可以确定的是，仅靠对旧有框架下修 修补补已然难以为继，必须要基于新时代环境构建新的能力。 观察代理人渠道的转型轨迹，是理解"十四五"期间人身险行业变革的一条核心主线。这个曾经创造行业 辉煌、贡献巨大价值的核心渠道，可以说是过去几年整个行业投入资源最多、期待最高的改革重镇。 我们到底该如何理解代理人渠道的过去、现在与未来？为什么行之有效三十几年的模式，短短几年便陷 入如此掣肘之境？ 表面上我们看到的是： 支撑传统模式的"人海"红利快速消退，令队伍规模从千万级的高点回落至260万，增员愈发艰难；近几 年传统模式边际效应不断下降，销售成本居高不下，陷入"高投入、低产出"的困境，"投入产出关系的 全面平衡"被打破；曾经的积弊也让行业的声誉受到明显的影响…… 积极的一面是，众多市场主体正通过不同的战略战术，疾行革 ...

Parent company continues to strengthen diversified service offerings while positioning for sustainable long-term growth ESCONDIDO, CA / ACCESS Newswire / November 19, 2025 / Afinida, Inc. (OTCID:TREP) ("Afinida," "the Company") today announced its financial results for the quarter ending September 30, 2025. The Company reported $16.9 million in year-to-date revenue, supported by its expanding portfolio of business service subsidiaries-spanning payroll, accounting, risk management, human resources, insurance ...

Core Insights - Three stocks are highlighted with strong income characteristics and a buy rank as of November 19th Group 1: First Hawaiian (FHB) - First Hawaiian offers a range of banking services including deposit products, lending services, and wealth management [1] - The Zacks Consensus Estimate for its current year earnings has increased by 4.9% over the last 60 days [1] - The company has a dividend yield of 4.5%, surpassing the industry average of 3.1% [2] Group 2: OP Bancorp (OPBK) - OP Bancorp provides commercial banking services to both retail and institutional customers [2] - The Zacks Consensus Estimate for its current year earnings has increased by 4.7% over the last 60 days [2] - The company has a dividend yield of 3.8%, compared to the industry average of 1.2% [2] Group 3: Jackson Financial (JXN) - Jackson Financial is a U.S. retirement services provider with a diverse portfolio of differentiated products [3] - The Zacks Consensus Estimate for its current year earnings has increased by 1.7% over the last 60 days [3] - The company has a dividend yield of 3.5%, which is higher than the industry average of 1.6% [3]

You'd think with all the exploits in DeFi, insurance would be huge.It's not.Nexus Mutual remains the only real player with $144m TVL. Everything else like Cover protocol already died.I guess, insuring 4% yields at 1.4% to 2% cost isn't attractive to still retail driven crowd.And now protocols just build their own insurance pools anyway (Aave's $1m deposit insurance).Interesting thing is $NXM trades unlike 99% of alts: it's actually up YTD and manage to 2x since 2023.But is still relatively low at $138M FDV. ...

Core Insights - UPS has experienced significant underperformance compared to the broader market, with a decline of 27.8% over the past year, while the S&P 500 Index has increased by nearly 14.1% [2] - The company's Q3 results showed an adjusted EPS of $1.74, surpassing Wall Street expectations of $1.31, and revenue of $21.4 billion, exceeding forecasts of $20.8 billion [4] - Analysts predict a 10.9% decline in UPS' EPS for the current fiscal year, with a consensus rating of "Moderate Buy" among 31 analysts [5] Performance Comparison - UPS has lagged behind the Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF, which gained about 3.1% over the past year, while UPS stock has seen double-digit losses [3] - Year-to-date, UPS stock is down 24.6%, contrasting with a 16.4% increase in the S&P 500 [2] Analyst Ratings and Price Targets - The current analyst configuration shows a decrease in bullish sentiment compared to two months ago, with only 13 "Strong Buy" ratings among the 31 analysts [5][6] - Truist Financial Corporation has maintained a "Buy" rating on UPS and raised the price target to $120, indicating a potential upside of 26.3% from current levels [6] - The mean price target of $104.10 suggests a 9.5% premium to UPS' current price, while the highest price target of $122 indicates an upside potential of 28.4% [6]

Financial Performance & Forecast - ORIX revised its FY26.3 net income forecast upward to 440 Billion JPY, a 15.8% increase from the previous forecast of 380 Billion JPY[6, 14] - The company increased its share buyback program to 150 Billion JPY, a 50% increase from the initial 100 Billion JPY program[6, 10] - H1 net income reached 271.1 Billion JPY, achieving 71% of the original full-year target and 62% of the revised forecast[13] - The company expects a full-year ROE in the 10% range, with H1 ROE hitting 12.7%, up 3.9 percentage points from the end of FY25.3[13, 21] Capital Recycling & Investment - Capital gains for H1 FY26.3 reached 157.1 Billion JPY, with expectations of further gains in H2[27] - The company launched its first domestic PE fund with a total size of 2.5 Billion USD[6] - ORIX sold stakes in Greenko, Ormat, ORIX Asset Management and Loan Services Corp, and Nissay Leasing[6] Segment Performance - Segment profits increased by 42% YoY to 409.4 Billion JPY[35] - Environment and Energy segment profits increased sharply by 117.3 Billion JPY due to the Greenko exit, which included a 95 Billion JPY gain on sale/valuation gains[34] - Insurance segment saw higher investment income, contributing to overall profit growth[35] Shareholder Returns - The company increased the full-year dividend forecast to 153.67 JPY per share, a 16.3% increase[6, 14] - The company anticipates a full-year total payout ratio of 73%[15]

BREAKING: Two Big Space Stock Winners Deliver Earnings Investors.com will undergo scheduled maintenance from 10:00 PM ET to 2:00 AM ET and some features may be unavailable. We apologize for any inconvenience. Mechanics Of The Long-Term Covered Call On SoFi stock, a Sept. 18, 2026, call option with a strike price of 35 can currently be sold for around $6.60. That amounts to an impressive $660 in premium per 100-share contract. Purchasing 100 shares of SoFi stock will cost around $3,050, but the net cost can ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the phenomenon of underinsurance against high-loss risks, emphasizing its severe social implications, particularly in developing countries. It highlights behavioral biases and financial literacy as key factors influencing insurance demand and decision-making [2][4]. Summary by Sections Introduction - The underinsurance phenomenon poses significant social challenges, especially in developing countries, due to substantial losses from natural disasters, diseases, and other risks [6]. Insurance Demand Puzzles - Three typical insurance puzzles are identified: underinsurance for low-probability high-loss risks, overinsurance for high-probability low-loss risks, and low demand for specific high-probability high-loss risks like long-term care insurance [3][8]. - Behavioral biases, such as short-sightedness and narrow framing, contribute to these puzzles by leading to suboptimal risk assessments and insurance decisions [4][8]. Behavioral Biases and Heuristics - Various cognitive biases affect insurance decision-making, including: - Coarse probability categorization, leading to misjudgment of risk probabilities [9]. - Short-sightedness, causing individuals to underestimate risks due to a focus on immediate concerns [17]. - Overconfidence, where individuals accurately assess average risks but underestimate their specific risk exposure [17]. - Availability heuristic, where recent or vivid memories disproportionately influence risk perception [21]. - Emotional factors, which significantly impact perceived value and insurance demand [23][25]. Financial Literacy as a Solution - Financial literacy is proposed as a systematic solution to address the underinsurance issue by enhancing public understanding and application of financial concepts [4][28]. - Studies indicate that higher financial literacy correlates with better insurance purchasing decisions and reduced behavioral biases [29][30]. - Financial education can effectively improve insurance demand, particularly in communities with low financial literacy [32][31]. Conclusion - The article concludes that addressing financial literacy gaps may be a viable pathway to mitigate the negative impacts of behavioral biases on insurance demand, ultimately leading to better financial outcomes for individuals [36][37].