Group 1 - The Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM) and the Invesco QQQ Trust ETF (QQQ) track the same index and have approximately $450 billion in assets under management, representing about 40% of the market [1] - The Sunday Investor focuses exclusively on U.S. Equity ETFs and has developed a proprietary ETF Rankings system that evaluates nearly 1,000 ETFs based on various factors [1] - The ETF Rankings system provides individual factor scores covering costs, liquidity, risk, size, value, dividends, growth, quality, momentum, and sentiment, resulting in a composite score from 1-10 [1]

Core Viewpoint - Bank of America has adopted a bullish stance on large-cap growth ETFs in its 2025 outlook, upgrading its category view from Neutral to Favorable and initiating coverage on 14 growth ETFs while refreshing ratings on five others [1][5][7]. Market Context - The upgrade occurs amidst a market dominated by tech, mega-cap, and AI stocks, with the concentration of the top stocks in the S&P 500 reaching unprecedented levels, driven by the "magnificent 7" [2][4]. - Despite high valuations, Bank of America believes that improved balance sheet quality and revenue growth could sustain the ongoing market rally [2]. ETF Performance - Large-cap growth ETFs like VUG and SCHG have seen significant inflows as investors pursue AI-driven earnings momentum [5]. - A total of 8 ETFs received the highest "1-FV" rating from Bank of America, indicating strong performance relative to other factors [9]. Risk Considerations - The market is currently facing additional risks, including potential government shutdowns, a weaker labor market, and possible fatigue from three years of continuous gains in the S&P 500 [4][7]. Rating Methodology - Bank of America evaluates ETFs based on various factors such as ROA, ROE, valuation, earnings growth, and expense ratios, with the best ETFs earning a "1-FV" rating and the worst receiving a "3-UF" rating [8][10].

Group 1 - Signal Advisors Wealth increased its position in Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM) by 25,696 shares, bringing total holdings to 119,618 shares valued at $27.35 million as of July 10, 2025 [1] - The ETF accounted for 2.12% of Signal Advisors' $1.28 billion 13F portfolio at the end of Q2 2025 [1] - QQQM closed at $228.63 on July 10, 2025, reflecting an 11.61% year-over-year increase, but underperformed the S&P 500 by 1 percentage point [2] Group 2 - Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF has assets under management of $55.25 billion and a dividend yield of 0.54% [3] - The fund aims to replicate the performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index, providing access to leading nonfinancial companies listed on Nasdaq [4][8] - QQQM has a lower annual expense ratio of 0.15% compared to 0.20% for the QQQ fund, making it more suitable for long-term investors [6][9] Group 3 - The fund's strategy targets diversified exposure to large-cap growth equities, particularly in technology and consumer sectors [8] - Signal Advisors' increase in QQQM holdings by 27% over a three-month period indicates a bullish outlook on the tech sector despite macroeconomic uncertainties [9]

Group 1: Market Index Overview - The S&P 500 is the primary measure of broad stock performance, but there are other indexes and variations that can be confusing for investors [1] - The Dow Jones Industrial Average is flawed as it weights constituents by stock price, leading to a skewed representation of market performance [2] - The S&P 500 uses a market cap-weighting methodology, making it more representative of the U.S. economy compared to the Dow [3] Group 2: Equal Weighting vs. Market Cap Weighting - The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF allows each company to impact performance equally, which has historically outperformed the regular S&P 500 index [4][5] - The Nasdaq-100 index consists of the 100 largest companies in the Nasdaq Composite and is also market cap-weighted, but its construction differs significantly from the S&P 500 [6] - The Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares has underperformed compared to the market cap-weighted Nasdaq-100 index [7] Group 3: Performance Analysis - Both equal-weighted and market cap-weighted indexes have experienced similar price drawdowns, indicating comparable risk [8] - Investors in the Direxion Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares face less reward with the same level of risk, which is not an advantageous trade-off [9] - Equal weighting benefits the S&P 500 by allowing smaller companies to have equal impact, but this logic does not apply well to the Nasdaq-100, which focuses on the largest companies [10] Group 4: Investment Recommendations - For those looking to invest in the Nasdaq-100, it is advisable to choose a straightforward ETF like the Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF, rather than attempting to apply equal weighting [11]