Workflow
PipingRock铬元素片
icon
Search documents
“血糖克星”三价铬真相调查:降糖功效科学性研究不足
Bei Ke Cai Jing· 2025-08-27 05:40
Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the growing trend of chromium trivalent dietary supplements marketed as effective solutions for blood sugar management, particularly targeting individuals with diabetes. However, experts warn that the scientific evidence supporting these claims is insufficient, and such products should not be considered substitutes for conventional diabetes medications. Group 1: Product Claims and Marketing Strategies - Many merchants promote chromium trivalent supplements as "natural insulin" and claim they can help consumers manage blood sugar levels effectively, often using exaggerated language to attract buyers [1][2][3] - Products are primarily sold through cross-border e-commerce platforms, often lacking clear labeling in Chinese, which complicates consumers' understanding of the ingredients and effects [1][13] - Common marketing tactics include promises of "repairing the pancreas" and "no side effects," with many products claiming to balance blood sugar through various mechanisms [3][4][11] Group 2: Expert Opinions and Scientific Evidence - Endocrinology and nutrition experts emphasize that the claims regarding chromium's effectiveness in lowering blood sugar lack robust scientific backing, and the term "natural insulin" is misleading [2][29][34] - Experts caution against self-medication based on these products, as they may lead to delayed treatment and worsening of diabetes [2][12][34] - The consensus among medical professionals is that diabetes management requires a comprehensive approach, including lifestyle changes and conventional medications, rather than reliance on single nutrient supplements [14][34] Group 3: Regulatory and Legal Concerns - The marketing of these dietary supplements often crosses legal boundaries by implying they can replace prescription medications, which violates advertising laws in China [19][20] - Many products are misrepresented as health supplements while lacking the necessary approvals and labeling required for such classifications, leading to potential consumer deception [25][27] - The article highlights the need for stricter regulations and consumer awareness regarding the claims made by dietary supplement manufacturers [20][28]