Core Viewpoint - The First Trust NASDAQ-100 Select Equal Weight ETF (QQEW) is a passively managed ETF aimed at providing broad exposure to the Large Cap Growth segment of the US equity market, with assets exceeding $1.73 billion, making it one of the larger ETFs in this category [1] Group 1: Large Cap Growth - Large cap companies typically have a market capitalization above $10 billion and are considered more stable with predictable cash flows, exhibiting less volatility compared to mid and small cap companies [2] - Growth stocks are characterized by faster growth rates, higher valuations, and above-average sales and earnings growth rates, although they tend to be more volatile [3] Group 2: Costs - The ETF has an annual operating expense ratio of 0.55%, which is competitive within its peer group, and a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 0.43% [4] Group 3: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation of approximately 50.5% to the Information Technology sector, with Healthcare and Telecom also being prominent sectors [5] - Western Digital Corporation (WDC) represents about 3.21% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings comprising approximately 26.18% of total assets under management [6] Group 4: Performance and Risk - QQEW aims to match the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index, having lost about 5.29% year-to-date and gained approximately 3.83% over the past year as of February 27, 2026, with a trading range between $106.81 and $146.24 in the past 52 weeks [7] - The ETF has a beta of 1.06 and a standard deviation of 17.41% over the trailing three-year period, indicating a medium risk profile with effective diversification across 51 holdings [8] Group 5: Alternatives - The Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ) are alternative ETFs tracking similar indices, with VUG having $196.69 billion in assets and an expense ratio of 0.03%, while QQQ has $399.83 billion in assets and charges 0.18% [11] Group 6: Bottom-Line - Passively managed ETFs like QQEW are increasingly popular among retail and institutional investors due to their low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency, making them suitable for long-term investment strategies [12]

Core Viewpoint - The Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) is highlighted as a strong investment option for those seeking exposure to a diversified portfolio of growth stocks, with solid historical performance metrics [2][4]. Performance Summary - Over the past 5 years, the Vanguard Growth ETF has returned 12.81%, while the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF has returned 13.82% [4]. - In the past 10 years, the Vanguard Growth ETF has achieved an 18.55% return compared to 16.09% for the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF [4]. - For the past 15 years, the Vanguard Growth ETF has delivered a 15.40% return, outpacing the S&P 500's 13.77% [4]. Key Features - The Vanguard Growth ETF has a low expense ratio of 0.04%, meaning an investor pays only $0.40 annually for every $1,000 invested [6]. - The ETF includes large, established companies, notably the "Magnificent Seven," which are key players in the growth stock sector [6]. Holdings Overview - The top 10 holdings of the Vanguard Growth ETF include: - Nvidia: 12.73% - Apple: 11.88% - Microsoft: 10.63% - Alphabet Class A: 5.39% - Amazon: 4.58% - Alphabet Class C: 4.27% - Meta Platforms: 4.26% - Broadcom: 4.04% - Tesla: 3.77% - Eli Lilly: 2.72% [7]. Considerations for Investment - The ETF may not be suitable for investors concerned about market volatility, as growth stocks typically experience sharper declines during market downturns [9]. - The fund is relatively concentrated, with approximately 64% of its assets in the top 10 holdings and about 35% in the top three holdings [9]. - The ETF offers a low yield of 0.42%, which may not appeal to investors seeking dividend income compared to the S&P 500's yield of 1.1% [9].

Core Viewpoint - Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a significant concentration in three stocks: NVIDIA, Apple, and Microsoft, which together account for 35.24% of the fund's portfolio, highlighting the risks associated with sector concentration in technology [1] Group 1: Fund Performance and Structure - VUG has $349.9 billion in assets and a low expense ratio of 0.04%, providing cost-effective exposure to major technology companies [1] - Over the past ten years, VUG has returned 443%, outperforming the S&P 500's 272% return, driven by its focus on transformative technology companies [1] - The fund's concentrated technology exposure has made it vulnerable to market shifts, particularly as rising interest rates have led to a rotation towards value stocks [1] Group 2: Investment Strategy and Risks - VUG is not a diversified growth fund; it heavily invests in technology, which represents 51.9% of its holdings, indicating a high sector-specific risk [1] - The ETF is suitable for long-term investors who believe in continued technology growth, accepting higher volatility for potential outperformance [1] - The fund's construction emphasizes growth over stability, lacking defensive sector exposure, which could provide a cushion during market downturns [1]

Core Insights - Vanguard has announced significant fee reductions across 84 mutual fund and exchange-traded share classes, impacting 53 different funds, with estimated savings of nearly $250 million for investors in 2026 alone [1] - The total savings from fee cuts over the past two years amounts to approximately $600 million, marking the largest two-year cost reduction in Vanguard's history [1] - The average expense ratio for Vanguard's entire lineup is now at 0.06%, reinforcing the firm's commitment to making investing more accessible and affordable [1] Fee Reductions Overview - The fee cuts affect 25% of Vanguard's total fund lineup, with an average reduction of 27% for the specific funds receiving cuts this year [1] - Notable ETFs impacted include the Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG), Vanguard Value ETF (VTV), FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO), Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG), and High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) [1] - In the fixed-income sector, 100% of Vanguard's active fixed-income funds and 89% of its fixed-income ETFs are now priced in the lowest cost decile of their respective categories [1] Implications for Financial Advisors - The correlation between cost and performance remains a key selling point for advisors, with 84% of Vanguard's funds outperforming peer group averages over the past decade [1] - In the active fixed-income space, 88% of Vanguard's active fixed-income funds have beaten their benchmarks, strengthening Vanguard's competitive position [1] - The fee reductions challenge advisors to justify the use of higher-cost active managers in client portfolios [1]

Core Insights - The Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has the potential to help investors reach the million-dollar mark through consistent investment and compound earnings over time [1][2]. Group 1: Investment Performance - Since its inception in January 2004, VUG has averaged annual returns of 11% and 17% over the past decade, with a long-term assumption of 14% annual returns being used for projections [2][4]. - Investing $500 per month in VUG could lead to over a million dollars in approximately 25 years, highlighting the power of regular contributions and compounding [2]. Group 2: Investment Strategy - VUG focuses on large-cap growth stocks, providing a dual benefit of investing in companies that grow revenue and profits faster than their industry average while also being more stable due to their established market positions [3]. - The historical performance of VUG shows it has outperformed the market in 15 out of 22 years, indicating a strong track record, although future performance is not guaranteed [4].

Core Insights - The Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) differ significantly in sector exposures, number of holdings, and cost, with VUG providing broader diversification and lower fees, while DIA focuses on blue-chip stability and higher income [1][8]. Cost & Size Comparison - VUG has an expense ratio of 0.04% and assets under management (AUM) of $204.8 billion, while DIA has a higher expense ratio of 0.16% and AUM of $45.5 billion [3][4]. - The one-year return for VUG is 21.1%, compared to DIA's 19.9%, and the dividend yield for VUG is 0.4%, while DIA offers a yield of 1.4% [3][4]. Performance & Risk Metrics - Over five years, VUG has a maximum drawdown of -35.61%, while DIA's maximum drawdown is -20.76% [5]. - An investment of $1,000 would grow to $1,937 in VUG and $1,596 in DIA over the same five-year period [5]. Portfolio Composition - DIA tracks the Dow Jones Industrial Average, consisting of 30 blue-chip stocks, with significant allocations in Financial Services (28%), Technology (20%), and Industrials (15%) [6]. - VUG holds over 166 companies, with a strong emphasis on Technology (64%), followed by Consumer Cyclical and Healthcare, featuring major positions in Apple Inc, NVIDIA Corp, and Microsoft Corp [7]. Investor Considerations - VUG is more suitable for slightly aggressive investors seeking higher returns and willing to accept higher volatility, while DIA may appeal to conservative investors looking for higher dividend yields and greater price stability [11].

Core Insights - The Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) are both designed to provide exposure to large-cap U.S. growth stocks, with a focus on technology [1] Cost & Size - Both VUG and SCHG have an expense ratio of 0.04% and similar dividend yields, with VUG at 0.41% and SCHG at 0.36% [2] - VUG has a significantly larger Assets Under Management (AUM) of $352 billion compared to SCHG's $53 billion [2] Performance & Risk Comparison - Over the past five years, VUG has experienced a maximum drawdown of -35.61%, while SCHG had a drawdown of -34.59% [3] - An investment of $1,000 in VUG would have grown to $1,929, whereas the same investment in SCHG would have grown to $2,036 over five years [3] Portfolio Composition - SCHG holds 198 companies, with 45% in technology, 16% in communication services, and 13% in consumer cyclical, featuring top positions in Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft [4] - VUG has a narrower portfolio of 160 stocks, with a heavier technology allocation of 51%, followed by communication services and consumer cyclical [5] Investment Implications - VUG's focus on technology may lead to greater volatility, as indicated by its higher beta of 1.21 compared to SCHG's 1.17 [8] - Investors seeking more exposure to technology may prefer VUG, while those looking for greater diversification and stability may opt for SCHG [9]

Core Insights - The Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) focuses on large-cap U.S. growth stocks, primarily in technology, while the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) provides equal weighting to all S&P 500 companies, resulting in a more balanced sector exposure [1][2] Cost & Size Comparison - VUG has a lower expense ratio of 0.04% compared to RSP's 0.20%, making it attractive for cost-conscious investors [3] - VUG's one-year return is 21.14%, significantly higher than RSP's 13.23%, while VUG's assets under management (AUM) stand at $352 billion versus RSP's $76 billion [3] - RSP offers a higher dividend yield of 1.64% compared to VUG's 0.41%, appealing to income-focused investors [3] Performance & Risk Analysis - Over five years, VUG has a max drawdown of -35.61%, while RSP's is -21.39%, indicating VUG's higher volatility [4] - A $1,000 investment in VUG would grow to $1,934 over five years, compared to $1,501 for RSP, showcasing VUG's superior growth potential [4] Portfolio Composition - RSP holds 504 stocks with a more diversified allocation, where technology comprises 16% of total assets, while VUG holds only 160 stocks with 51% in technology [5][6] - The top three holdings in RSP account for less than 1% of its portfolio, contrasting with VUG's top three holdings, which make up over 32% of its assets, indicating a higher concentration risk for VUG [6][8] Investor Implications - RSP's diversified approach may appeal to conservative investors, while VUG's tech-heavy focus may attract those seeking higher returns despite increased risk [7][10] - The choice between VUG and RSP depends on individual investment goals, with VUG offering higher potential returns at the cost of greater volatility, and RSP providing stability with limited growth potential [9][10]

Core Insights - The First Trust NASDAQ-100 Select Equal Weight ETF (QQEW) debuted on April 19, 2006, and provides broad exposure to the Style Box - Large Cap Growth category of the market [1] Fund Overview - QQEW is sponsored by First Trust Advisors and has accumulated assets over $1.87 billion, positioning it as an average-sized ETF in its category [5] - The ETF aims to match the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index, which tracks the 50 companies from the Nasdaq-100 Index with the highest combined Blended Quality and Growth scores [5] Cost Structure - QQEW has an annual operating expense ratio of 0.55%, which is competitive within its peer group [6] - The ETF offers a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 0.41% [6] Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation in the Information Technology sector, comprising approximately 40.3% of the portfolio [7] - Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) represents about 1.4% of the fund's total assets, with its top 10 holdings accounting for roughly 12.97% of QQEW's total assets under management [8] Performance Metrics - Year-to-date, QQEW has experienced a loss of about -0.8%, while it has gained approximately 12.92% over the last 12 months as of January 15, 2026 [10] - The ETF has traded between $106.81 and $146.24 in the past 52 weeks, with a beta of 1.06 and a standard deviation of 17.50% over the trailing three-year period, indicating medium risk [10] Alternatives - Other ETFs in the large-cap growth space include Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ), with VUG having $202.35 billion in assets and an expense ratio of 0.04%, while QQQ has $407.22 billion in assets and an expense ratio of 0.20% [11]

Core Insights - ETFs are recommended as an effective way for new investors to achieve diversification and start investing [1] - A consistent investment strategy, such as dollar-cost averaging, can lead to significant wealth accumulation over time [2] ETF Analysis - **Vanguard 500 ETF**: This fund tracks the S&P 500 and includes 500 of the largest U.S. companies, providing a strong foundation for most investors' portfolios. It has generated an average annual return of 14.8% over the last decade and 23% over the past three years [3][5] - **Vanguard Growth ETF**: This ETF focuses on growth stocks and has produced a yearly return of 17.5% over the past 10 years and 32.5% over the last three years [6] - **Invesco QQQ Trust**: Tracking the Nasdaq-100 index, this ETF has generated an average return of 19.4% over the last decade and 32.9% over the past three years, heavily weighted towards tech stocks [6] - **Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF**: This ETF offers exposure to international AI companies, with nearly 35% of its portfolio in international stocks. It achieved a 32% return in 2025 and an average of 36.4% over the past three years [7][8] - **Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF**: This fund focuses on companies that can maintain and grow their dividends, with a forward yield of 3.8% and an average annual return of 11.5% over the past decade [9][11]