Core Viewpoint - The report highlights the detection of 38 mobile applications that violate personal information protection laws, indicating a significant issue in compliance with regulations such as the Cybersecurity Law and the Personal Information Protection Law [1][10]. Group 1: Violations of Personal Information Collection - Two applications failed to publicly disclose their rules for collecting and using personal information: "家政加" and "聘巢" [1]. - Nineteen applications did not list the purposes, methods, and scope of personal information collection: "联想乐云", "画啦啦美术课堂", "智通直聘", "才通直聘", "达管家", "同城招聘", "e家政", "快马日结", "2345浏览器", "微米浏览器", "淘最热点", "当日急聘", "闪电直聘", "吉工家", "建筑招工", "微车", "in", "找零工", "汇博招聘" [2]. - Four applications did not inform users of the purpose when requesting permission to collect personal information: "e家政", "in", "聘巢", "找零工" [3]. - Four applications failed to inform users of the purpose when collecting sensitive personal information: "我要聘", "闪电直聘", "吉工家", "建筑招工" [4]. - Three applications began collecting personal information before obtaining user consent: "秀色直播", "微米浏览器", "当日急聘" [5]. - Nineteen applications collected personal information beyond the scope authorized by users: "联想乐云", "画啦啦美术课堂", "达管家", "德管家", "他趣", "同城招聘", "e家政", "快马日结", "2345浏览器", "微米浏览器", "淘最热点", "当日急聘", "闪电直聘", "吉工家", "建筑招工", "微车", "in", "找零工", "汇博招聘" [6]. Group 2: Inadequate User Rights and Information - Three applications had personal information protection policies that described the need for information collection beyond necessary functions: "地铁查询宝", "文件解压管家", "微车" [6]. - One application declared the collection of personal information permissions in its configuration file that exceeded necessary functions: "爱看书免费小说" [7]. - Six applications collected personal information beyond the necessary scope of their functions: "豆果美食", "百思漂流瓶", "优惠券", "乐播投屏", "卡牛信用管家", "轻喜到家" [9]. - One application collected personal information more frequently than necessary: "家宝兔" [9]. - Two applications required users to enable permissions not needed for current functions: "同城招聘", "找零工" [9]. - One application forced users to provide unnecessary personal information: "e家政" [9]. - One application did not provide users with a way to correct or supplement their personal information: "当日急聘" [9]. - One application did not offer a way for users to cancel their accounts: "找零工" [9]. - Two applications set unreasonable conditions or additional requirements in the account cancellation process: "597直聘", "快马日结" [9]. - Three applications did not provide an option to exit or close personalized display modes: "壁纸多多", "找零工", "汇博招聘" [9].