此外，草案二审稿还对司法救助的适用条件及其与社会救助的衔接作了规定，明确"对遭受犯罪侵害或 者民事侵权，获得司法救助仍然面临生活困难的当事人，符合社会救助条件的，纳入社会救助对象范 围。"（彭 波） 关的情况"，并增加规定泄露个人隐私或者个人信息的法律责任。 草案规定，对最低生活保障边缘家庭中的重度残疾人、重病患者等特殊困难人员，可以纳入最低生活保 障范围。有意见提出，应当将确有特殊困难人员纳入低保救助范围。对此，草案二审稿将"重度残疾 人、重病患者等特殊困难人员"修改为"重度残疾人、重病患者以及确有特殊困难人员"。 中办、国办印发的《关于改革完善社会救助制度的意见》中规定，"积极发展服务类社会救助，形成'物 质+服务'的救助方式""有条件的地区有序推进持有居住证人员在居住地申办社会救助"。据此，草案二 审稿中增加规定："国家积极发展服务类社会救助，为社会救助对象提供必要的照护服务、生活服务、 关爱服务等""有条件的地方可以有序推进持有居住证人员在居住地申请"。 2月25日，社会救助法草案二审稿提请十四届全国人大常委会第二十一次会议审议。草案二审稿中进一 步加强了关于保护个人隐私和个人信息方面的规定。 社会救 ...

中办、国办印发的《关于改革完善社会救助制度的意见》中规定，"积极发展服务类社会救助，形成'物 质+服务'的救助方式""有条件的地区有序推进持有居住证人员在居住地申办社会救助"。据此，草案二 审稿中增加规定："国家积极发展服务类社会救助，为社会救助对象提供必要的照护服务、生活服务、 关爱服务等""有条件的地方可以有序推进持有居住证人员在居住地申请"。 此外，草案二审稿还对司法救助的适用条件及其与社会救助的衔接作了规定，明确"对遭受犯罪侵害或 者民事侵权，获得司法救助仍然面临生活困难的当事人，符合社会救助条件的，纳入社会救助对象范 围。"本报记者 彭 波 [ 责编：袁晴 ] 2月25日，社会救助法草案二审稿提请十四届全国人大常委会第二十一次会议审议。草案二审稿中进一 步加强了关于保护个人隐私和个人信息方面的规定。 社会救助法草案第一条对立法目的作了规定。有的常委委员、部门和基层立法联系点提出，健全社会救 助体系是社会救助立法的重要目的，建议对此予以明确。对此，草案二审稿增加规定"健全社会救助体 系"，并将"共享改革发展成果"修改为"让人民共享改革发展成果"，将"践行为人民服务的宗旨"修改 为"践行全心全意为人民服 ...

个人信息5元500条 临近续保频遭推销 车主隐私泄露屡禁不止为哪般 "一天最高接到5通电话""天天接到续保电话让人受不了""手机被迫改成白名单模式，见到陌生电话 都害怕"……在社交平台上，不少用户投诉称，车险临期，车主频频遭遇各类保险电话密集推销，不仅 严重影响用户体验，还引发消费者对车险客户信息泄露、行业数据安全及电话营销乱象的担忧。 记者调查发现，车主个人信息在购险、用车等多个环节均存在泄露风险。由于违规成本较低，电话 营销扰民乱象屡禁不止，车主的隐私权益难以得到切实保障。 营销话术围攻 车主苦不堪言 "我的车险今年1月才到期，可骚扰电话提前两个月就来了，最多一天能接5个车险推销电话。"广州 车主陈先生说，这些电话都来自自称中国人保财险公司的不同销售人员，包括直销人员和外包团队。他 粗略计算，半个月内已接到数十通推销电话，严重干扰了正常工作与生活。 ——内部管理存在漏洞，业绩导向助长过度营销。根据国家金融监督管理总局发布的《保险销售行 为管理办法》规定，保险公司、保险中介机构应当按照合法、正当、必要、诚信的原则收集处理投保 人、被保险人、受益人以及保险业务活动相关当事人的个人信息，并妥善保管，防止信息泄露 ...

个人信息沦为"商品"，根源在于违法成本过低，监管存在盲区。近年来，我国不断加大对公民个人信息 保护力度。个人信息保护法已施行4年有余，为破解个人信息保护中的难点问题提供了有力法律武器。 2025年1月至11月，检察机关起诉利用网络实施的侵犯公民个人信息犯罪1685人。然而，一些常用服务 产品和常见生活场景中，仍然存在违法违规收集使用个人信息的现象，并由此形成黑灰产业链。 近期，部分地方的景区、博物馆出现"黄牛"贩卖预约二维码的乱象。这种行为不仅扰乱了旅游市场秩 序，更暴露出个人信息保护的突出短板。 景区预约需身份证登记，"黄牛"手中的预约码是怎么来的？江西省景德镇市人民检察院办理的一起案例 显示，部分"黄牛"违法使用他人姓名、身份证号等个人信息预约中国陶瓷博物馆，并在博物馆附近及部 分网络平台，将绑定他人个人信息预约入馆的二维码等凭证以80元至300元的价格倒卖。有的旅行社甚 至多次使用之前游客身份信息反复登记入馆，个别游客半年内重复入馆上百次。 织密法治之网、筑牢技术之盾、压实监管之责，方能让游客安心出行，保障行业健康发展。 （文章来源：经济日报） 取得个人的同意，是处理个人信息的首要条件。在没有重新取得他 ...

针对存在通过AI"换脸"技术假冒公众人物营销带货、售卖"开盒"服务、侵害他人合法权益问题的网站平 台，存在未经许可违规从事互联网新闻信息服务问题的"中访网"等网站，国家网信办指导属地网信办依 法采取约谈、责令改正、顶格罚款、警告、处置相关账号、停止互联网新闻信息服务活动、处理责任人 等处置处罚措施。针对热搜榜单重点环节频繁呈现不良信息内容的网站平台，国家网信办依法加大曝光 力度，强化警示震慑。 针对存在偷税漏税问题的网络名人账号，依法予以禁言、暂停粉丝数增长、暂停营利权限、清除因违规 行为增加的粉丝数量处置。针对存在炒作服刑劣迹、传播错误价值导向的网络账号，依法予以关闭、禁 言、暂停粉丝数增长等处置。针对存在发布涉企虚假信息、破坏营商网络环境问题的"柴怼怼"、"CHE 车说道"等网络账号，存在"饭圈"极端化、娱乐八卦、挑动阶层对立等破坏网络生态问题的网络账号， 存在违规使用具有新闻属性账号名称、混淆视听、假冒仿冒新闻媒体等问题的微博"上海午报"等网络账 号，依法予以关闭处置。 持续加大网络安全等领域违法行为查处力度，保护广大网民合法权益 2025年全国网信系统严格规范公正文明执法 护航网信事业高质量发展 20 ...

Core Viewpoint - The case of identity theft involving a doctoral graduate highlights significant vulnerabilities in personal information management, social security verification mechanisms, and industry qualification regulations, necessitating systemic reforms to protect citizens' rights and data security [17] Group 1: Incident Overview - A doctoral graduate, Ms. Dong, discovered that her identity had been misused by six construction companies in Zhejiang, leading to complications in her employment process [3] - The misuse of her identity resulted in the loss of her eligibility for public service exams and talent subsidies, prompting her to sue one of the companies involved [3] Group 2: Investigation Findings - Investigations revealed that small construction companies often purchase personal information through intermediaries to meet labor requirements for project qualifications, only to cease contributions after obtaining the necessary approvals [5] - A middleman named Sun was found to have purchased personal information of 37 individuals for over 9,000 yuan, with Ms. Dong's ID among the documents seized during a police raid [7] Group 3: Legal Outcomes - The court sentenced Sun to three years and two months in prison for multiple offenses, including the sale of identification documents and infringement of personal information rights, while another individual, Kou, received a sentence of one year and six months [13] - The prosecution has initiated civil support procedures to assist Ms. Dong in claiming compensation of approximately 30,000 to 40,000 yuan from the involved construction companies [14] Group 4: Systemic Implications - The incident underscores the need for comprehensive reforms in personal information management and social security systems to prevent identity theft and ensure the integrity of employment data [17] - Experts emphasize the importance of addressing these systemic issues rather than merely resolving individual cases, advocating for stronger regulatory measures to protect citizens' information and rights [17]

Core Viewpoint - The "Liangjian Pujiang" initiative in Shanghai aims to enhance personal information protection through legal enforcement, addressing the challenges posed by digital technology in daily life [1][9]. Group 1: Initiative Overview - The "Liangjian Pujiang" personal information protection enforcement action was launched in June 2023, focusing on consumer scenarios that frequently collect personal data [2][4]. - The initiative has evolved over three years, with 2023 focusing on "small cuts" in daily life, 2024 targeting typical scenarios, and 2025 aiming for ecological construction in governance [1][19]. Group 2: Enforcement Actions - The initiative identified eight consumer scenarios with significant data collection issues, including QR code dining, parking payments, and children's education [2][4]. - Major coffee chains like Starbucks were targeted for frequent data collection practices, leading to compliance training and guidance from regulatory bodies [5][6]. Group 3: Legal Framework and Governance - The implementation of the Personal Information Protection Law in 2021 marked a new phase in legal governance, with Shanghai establishing a scene-based governance model [9][10]. - The initiative has created a governance framework that includes collaboration among various departments, breaking down silos for effective enforcement [11][12]. Group 4: Innovative Solutions - The introduction of the "Pure Code" for parking payments allows users to pay without providing personal information, demonstrating innovative governance thinking [13][14]. - The initiative emphasizes a balanced approach to sensitive data collection, advocating for minimal use and maximum transparency [15][16]. Group 5: Long-term Mechanisms - The "Liangjian Pujiang" initiative has transitioned from a special action to a sustainable governance model, establishing a closed-loop enforcement process [19][20]. - By 2025, the initiative aims to solidify its achievements through continuous legal guidance and compliance resources for businesses [20][21].

Group 1 - The article highlights the rise in fraudulent activities targeting travelers during the Spring Festival travel rush, with scammers exploiting the urgency of passengers to confirm travel plans [2] - Travelers have reported receiving messages about flight cancellations due to mechanical issues, offering free rescheduling and compensation, which are part of the scam [2] - The frequency of these scams reveals vulnerabilities in personal information protection and a lack of awareness regarding fraud prevention among travelers [2] Group 2 - It is recommended to strengthen the crackdown on illegal information trading and enhance regulation of suspicious apps to prevent the circulation of fraudulent tools [2] - Travelers are advised to conduct ticket changes or cancellations only through official airline websites or customer service to avoid falling victim to fake rescheduling offers [2]

Core Viewpoint - The National Cybersecurity Incident Response Center has identified 72 mobile applications that illegally collect and use personal information between December 26, 2025, and January 20, 2026 [1] Group 1: Financial Apps Involved - Several financial apps are among the 72 identified, including Zhongshan Securities, Dazhihui, Guotai Junan Futures, and Wenkang Futures [2][3] - Dazhihui has the highest number of violations, totaling six specific issues related to user consent and privacy policy transparency [4] Group 2: Specific Violations of Dazhihui - The app failed to clearly prompt users to read the privacy policy upon first use and used default consent mechanisms [4] - The privacy policy did not adequately detail the purposes, methods, and scope of personal information collection [4] - Dazhihui did not inform users about third parties receiving their personal information without explicit consent [4] - The app lacked effective features for users to correct, delete personal information, or cancel their accounts [5] - There was no easy way for users to withdraw consent for personal information collection [5] - The app did not have specific rules for handling personal information of minors and did not obtain parental consent [5] Group 3: Regulatory Attention on Financial Apps - Financial apps, particularly brokerage apps, have been under increasing regulatory scrutiny, with multiple apps being named for violations in 2025 [6] - The Shanghai Communications Administration reported several brokerage apps, including Shenwan Hongyuan and Dongfang Securities, for similar issues [6] - Legal experts emphasize the need for enhanced user identity verification and transaction monitoring to protect user rights in financial apps [6]

Core Viewpoint - The implementation of the Personal Information Protection Law and the ongoing crackdown on cybercrime by public security agencies have highlighted the importance of personal information security as a legal compliance issue. Group 1: Illegal Activities of Legal Consulting Companies - Numerous cases have emerged in regions such as Zhejiang, Hubei, and Shanghai, where legal consulting companies have been found selling personal information through illegal channels, often disguised as legitimate services [1][3]. - A recent operation in Dongying City led to the dismantling of a criminal group posing as a legal consulting firm, which was involved in the illegal acquisition and sale of personal information [1][2]. - The profit model of these companies involves collaborating with "check archives" black market service providers to obtain sensitive personal information, which is then resold to clients at prices ranging from 500 to 2000 yuan per case [2][3]. Group 2: Legal Implications and Responsibilities - Engaging with illegal "check archives" services can expose clients to legal liabilities, especially if they are aware of the illegality but choose to proceed [4][5]. - Legal consulting companies must operate within the law, requiring a legitimate contract with a law firm and proper authorization for any information retrieval [5]. - The use of illegally obtained information as evidence in court is generally inadmissible, although exceptions may apply if the evidence significantly impacts the case [5]. Group 3: Recommendations for Legal Information Retrieval - Citizens are advised to avoid illegal methods for obtaining personal information and to retain copies of identification documents before disputes arise [6]. - Hiring a lawyer is recommended for efficient and legal information retrieval, as lawyers have access to more legitimate channels [6].