Core Insights - The Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) is U.S.-focused with lower costs and larger assets under management, while the iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF (KXI) offers global diversification with a higher fee and slightly higher yield [1][2] Cost and Size Comparison - VDC has an expense ratio of 0.09% and assets under management (AUM) of $8.5 billion, while KXI has an expense ratio of 0.39% and AUM of $884.8 million [3][4] - The one-year return for VDC is 9.0%, compared to KXI's 14.8%, and both have a similar dividend yield, with VDC at 2.26% and KXI at 2.30% [3][4] Performance and Risk Analysis - Over the past five years, VDC has a maximum drawdown of 16.55%, while KXI has a drawdown of 17.43% [5] - A $1,000 investment in VDC would have grown to $1,481 over five years, compared to $1,322 for KXI [5] Portfolio Composition - KXI invests in 96 companies, with 97% in consumer defensive stocks and 3% in consumer cyclical stocks, including major holdings like Walmart and Costco [6] - VDC is heavily U.S.-centric, with 98% in consumer defensive stocks, and its largest positions include Walmart, Costco, and Procter & Gamble [7] Investment Implications - VDC has generated annualized total returns of 9.5% since 2006, outperforming KXI's 7.6%, despite both funds having similar top holdings [8] - KXI offers more international exposure, with only 60% of its holdings in U.S. stocks, while VDC's core holdings are primarily U.S.-based but generate significant overseas sales [10] - The lower expense ratio of VDC makes it a more attractive option for cost-conscious investors, especially given its long-term outperformance [11]

Core Insights - The Invesco Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) and the iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF (KXI) cater to different investor needs based on their expense ratios, geographic focus, and performance metrics [1][2] Fund Structure and Costs - PBJ has a higher expense ratio of 0.61% compared to KXI's 0.39% [3] - KXI has a significantly larger asset under management (AUM) of $884.8 million versus PBJ's $94.1 million [3] - KXI offers a higher dividend yield of 2.30% compared to PBJ's 1.83% [3] Performance Metrics - KXI outperformed PBJ with a one-year return of 14.8% compared to PBJ's 1.0% [1][3] - Over five years, PBJ's maximum drawdown was -15.84%, while KXI's was -17.43% [5] - The growth of $1,000 over five years was $1,363 for PBJ and $1,322 for KXI [5] Portfolio Composition - KXI holds 96 global consumer staples stocks, primarily in consumer defensive sectors (97%), with major holdings including Walmart and Costco [6][7] - PBJ is more concentrated with just over 30 U.S.-listed stocks, focusing on food and beverage companies, with top positions like Corteva and Monster Beverage [7] Investment Considerations - Both ETFs have generated similar long-term returns, with KXI at 7.6% and PBJ at 7.4% annually over the last 20 years [8] - KXI may be more appealing for investors seeking growth and higher income, while PBJ may attract those looking for stability in U.S. food and beverage companies [10][11]

Core Insights - The iShares US Consumer Staples ETF (IYK) and iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF (KXI) cater to investors interested in the consumer staples sector, with IYK focusing on U.S. companies and KXI offering a broader global perspective [1][2] Group 1: Cost & Size - Both IYK and KXI have similar expense ratios, with IYK at 0.38% and KXI at 0.39% [3][4] - As of January 9, 2026, IYK has a one-year return of 6.2% and a dividend yield of 2.7%, while KXI has a one-year return of 11.2% and a dividend yield of 2.2% [3][10] - IYK has assets under management (AUM) of $1.2 billion, while KXI has AUM of $908.7 million [3][9] Group 2: Performance & Risk Comparison - Over the past five years, IYK has experienced a maximum drawdown of -15.04%, while KXI's maximum drawdown is -17.43% [5] - The growth of a $1,000 investment over five years is $1,139 for IYK and $1,136 for KXI, indicating similar performance [5] Group 3: Portfolio Composition - KXI holds 96 global equities, with major positions in Walmart, Costco, and Philip Morris, and is heavily weighted towards consumer defensive stocks [6] - IYK is concentrated on 54 U.S. holdings, with significant investments in Procter & Gamble, Coca-Cola, and also includes exposure to healthcare and basic materials [7][10] Group 4: Investor Implications - Income-oriented investors may prefer IYK due to its higher dividend yield, while those seeking international exposure may favor KXI for its broader global holdings [11]

Market Overview - The U.S. stock market is experiencing a significant rally, with major indices reaching new highs, primarily driven by the growth of artificial intelligence (AI) and tech stocks [1] - Analysts and economists express concerns that this rally may be a speculative bubble, indicating a potential market correction in the near future [3][4] Defensive Sector ETFs - Investors may shift their focus towards Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs), particularly defensive sector ETFs, which have historically provided protection against losses during economic downturns [2] - Defensive sector ETFs are seen as a safe harbor during periods of market turbulence, with sectors like consumer staples, utilities, and healthcare being favored for their stability [7] Consumer Staples ETFs - Consumer staples ETFs offer exposure to essential goods companies, which are less sensitive to economic cycles [8] - Notable consumer staples ETFs include Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLP), Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC), and iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF (KXI) [8] - XLP is highlighted as the cheapest option, with fees of 8 basis points and assets under management (AUM) of $15.7 million [9] Utility ETFs - Utility ETFs are characterized by steady demand and relative protection from trade and policy disruptions [10] - Key utility ETFs to consider include Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU), iShares U.S. Utilities ETF (IDU), and Vanguard Utilities ETF (VPU) [10] - XLU is noted as the most cost-effective option, charging 8 basis points in fees and having AUM of $21.9 million [11] Healthcare ETFs - The healthcare sector is resilient due to the ongoing demand for medical services and innovations [12] - Prominent healthcare ETFs include iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ), Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT), and Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLV) [12] - XLV is identified as the cheapest option, with fees of 8 basis points and AUM of $36.1 million [12] Market Valuation Concerns - The Shiller P/E ratio is currently at 46.2%, significantly above the 20-year average of 27.2, indicating that the market may be overvalued and future returns could be limited [5] - The concentration of investments in a few tech giants raises concerns about fragility in the market, as small earnings setbacks could lead to sharp declines [6]