Core Points - Rosen Law Firm is reminding purchasers of Skye Bioscience, Inc. securities of the lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit, which is January 16, 2026 [1] - Investors who purchased Skye securities during the specified Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by contacting Rosen Law Firm [3] Case Details - The lawsuit alleges that during the Class Period, defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding Skye's business and prospects, particularly concerning the effectiveness of nimacimab [5] - Specific claims include that nimacimab was less effective than represented, leading to overstated clinical, regulatory, and commercial prospects [5] - The lawsuit asserts that when the true details became known, investors suffered damages [5] Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions [4] - The firm has achieved significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company and has consistently ranked highly in securities class action settlements [4] - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, showcasing its capability in recovering funds for clients [4]

Group 1 - GK Resources Ltd. and Syntholene Energy Corp. have filed a Filing Statement related to their reverse takeover transaction, encouraging investors to review it for full details [1][2] - The transaction is expected to close around December 9, 2025, with GK changing its name to "Syntholene Energy Corp." and listing on the TSX Venture Exchange under the new symbol "ESAF" [2] - The transaction remains subject to customary closing conditions, including escrow release conditions and final approval from the TSXV [2] Group 2 - Syntholene Energy Corp. is focused on commercializing a new production pathway for low-cost clean fuel synthesis, targeting ultrapure synthetic jet fuel at a cost 70% lower than competing technologies [4] - The company employs a power-to-liquid strategy that utilizes thermal energy for hydrogen production and fuel synthesis, having secured 20MW of dedicated energy for its upcoming demonstration facility [5] - Syntholene aims to deliver a scalable modular production platform for cost-competitive synthetic fuel, contributing to the commercialization of carbon-neutral efuels globally [6] Group 3 - GK Resources Ltd. is a mineral property exploration company that began trading on the TSX Venture Exchange in March 2019 [7]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is encouraging investors of Cepton, Inc. who incurred losses exceeding $100,000 during the specified Class Period to seek legal counsel before the December 8, 2025 deadline for lead plaintiff applications [1][2]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The class action pertains to Cepton, Inc. common stock transactions between July 29, 2024, and January 6, 2025, during which investors may be entitled to compensation without upfront costs through a contingency fee arrangement [2][5]. - The lawsuit alleges that Cepton's management made materially false and misleading statements regarding the company's business and operations, including failing to disclose a credible third-party bid that valued Cepton at more than double the Koito Acquisition [5]. Group 2: Legal Representation - Investors are advised to select qualified legal counsel with a proven track record in securities class actions, as many firms may lack the necessary experience and resources [4]. - The Rosen Law Firm has a history of successful settlements in securities class actions, including a notable $438 million recovery for investors in 2019 [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is encouraging investors of Freeport-McMoRan Inc. to secure legal counsel before the January 12, 2026 deadline for a securities class action lawsuit related to the company's operations during the specified class period from February 15, 2022, to September 24, 2025 [1][2]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Freeport-McMoRan securities during the class period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the court to serve as lead plaintiff by January 12, 2026 [3]. - The lawsuit alleges that Freeport-McMoRan made false or misleading statements regarding safety measures at the Grasberg Block Cave mine in Indonesia, which led to increased risks for workers and potential regulatory and reputational consequences [5]. Group 2: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own achievements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company [4]. - The firm has been ranked highly for its number of securities class action settlements and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone [4].

Core Concept - Mindverse has launched Second Me, a social platform designed for the AI era, aiming to create a new category of social networking where AI identities represent real humans rather than replacing them [1][11]. Group 1: Technology and Model - Second Me utilizes AI to reconstruct human personality, patterns, and voice into a persistent identity layer that facilitates meaningful connections [2]. - The platform is powered by the Second Me Model, a multimodal identity engine that gained over 10,000 GitHub stars in under three weeks, analyzing personal memories and emotional patterns to create a nuanced understanding of individuals [3]. - Unlike traditional platforms that use broad labels, the Second Me Model captures fine-grained human truths, building a new type of social graph based on personality resonance [4]. Group 2: Social Architecture - In the AI Identity Network, Second Me identities interact dynamically, comparing traits and initiating conversations, allowing humans to join at the right moment [5]. - This architecture transforms social interactions by making identity authentic, conversations proactive, and matching resonance-based, focusing on deep personality signals [6]. - The platform encourages serendipitous connections, driven by continuous identity interactions, with AI acting as a bridge [6][12]. Group 3: Authenticity and Human Connection - Second Me is built on the principle that every AI identity corresponds to a real human, ensuring interactions remain grounded in human intent and authenticity [10]. - By eliminating bots and fictional personas, Second Me maintains a clean social graph composed solely of real people [11]. - The platform minimizes small talk, making discovery and relationship-building continuous, and fostering serendipitous connections by design [12].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is encouraging investors of Telix Pharmaceuticals Ltd. to secure legal counsel before the January 9, 2026 deadline for a securities class action lawsuit related to the company's misleading statements during the class period from February 21, 2025 to August 28, 2025 [1][5]. Group 1: Legal Action Details - Investors who purchased Telix securities during the specified class period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and those wishing to serve as lead plaintiff must act by January 9, 2026 [3][6]. - The lawsuit alleges that Telix's defendants made materially false statements regarding the company's progress in prostate cancer therapeutics and the quality of its supply chain, leading to investor damages when the truth was revealed [5]. Group 2: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own achievements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company [4]. - The firm has been ranked highly for its number of securities class action settlements and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is encouraging investors of Marex Group plc who incurred losses exceeding $100,000 during the specified class period to seek legal counsel before the December 8, 2025 deadline for a securities class action lawsuit [1][2]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The class period for the Marex Group plc securities class action is from May 16, 2024, to August 5, 2025 [1]. - Investors who purchased Marex securities during this period may be eligible for compensation without any upfront fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - To participate in the class action, investors must act before the December 8, 2025 deadline to serve as lead plaintiff [3]. Group 2: Legal Representation - The Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a proven track record in securities class actions [4]. - The firm has achieved significant settlements in the past, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company and has consistently ranked highly in securities class action settlements [4]. Group 3: Allegations Against Marex - The lawsuit alleges that Marex made materially false and misleading statements, including selling over-the-counter financial instruments to itself and inconsistencies in financial statements [5]. - It is claimed that these misrepresentations led to investors suffering damages when the true financial situation of Marex was revealed [5].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding purchasers of Avantor, Inc. common stock about the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit, indicating potential compensation for affected investors [1][2]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The class period for the Avantor common stock lawsuit is from March 5, 2024, to October 28, 2025, inclusive [1]. - Investors who purchased stock during this period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - Interested parties can join the class action by submitting a form or contacting the law firm directly [3][6]. Group 2: Legal Representation - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions [4]. - The firm has achieved significant settlements in the past, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company and has consistently ranked highly in securities class action settlements [4]. Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that Avantor's management misrepresented the company's competitive positioning and failed to disclose negative impacts from increased competition [5]. - It is claimed that these misrepresentations led to materially false and misleading statements regarding Avantor's business operations and prospects, resulting in investor damages when the truth was revealed [5].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is encouraging investors of WPP plc who incurred losses exceeding $100,000 during the specified class period to secure legal counsel before the December 8, 2025 deadline for a securities class action lawsuit [1][2]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased WPP ADSs between February 27, 2025, and July 8, 2025, may be eligible for compensation without any upfront costs through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by December 8, 2025 [3][6]. - The Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a proven track record in securities class actions [4]. Group 2: Allegations Against WPP - The complaint alleges that WPP's management provided overly positive statements while concealing material adverse facts about the company's media arm, which was reportedly unprepared for macroeconomic challenges and losing market share [5].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is encouraging investors of Synopsys, Inc. to secure legal counsel before the December 30, 2025 deadline for a securities class action lawsuit related to misleading statements made by the company during the class period from December 4, 2024, to September 9, 2025 [1][5]. Group 1: Legal Action Details - Investors who purchased Synopsys securities during the specified class period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the court to serve as lead plaintiff by December 30, 2025 [3]. - The Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions [4]. Group 2: Allegations Against Synopsys - The lawsuit alleges that Synopsys made materially false and misleading statements and failed to disclose adverse facts about its business and operations [5]. - Specific claims include that Synopsys' focus on artificial intelligence customers was negatively impacting the economics of its Design IP business and that certain strategic decisions were unlikely to yield intended results [5]. - The lawsuit asserts that these undisclosed issues had a materially negative impact on Synopsys' financial results, leading to investor damages when the true information became public [5].