证券代码：000826 证券简称：启迪环境 公告编号：2025-057 关于增加 2025 年第一次临时股东大会临时提案 暨召开 2025 年第一次临时股东大会补充通知的公告 本公司及董事会全体成员保证公告内容的真实、准确和完整， 公告不存在虚假记载、误导性陈述或者重大遗漏。 启迪环境科技发展股份有限公司（以下简称"启迪环境"或"公司"）于 2025 年 8 月 30 日在《中国证券报》《证券时报》《上海证券报》及巨潮资讯网发布了《启迪环境科技发 展股份有限公司关于召开 2025 年第一次临时股东大会的通知》（公告编号：2025-048），公 司将于 2025 年 10 月 10 日召开 2025 年第一次临时股东大会。 公司于 2025 年 9 月 22 日召开了第十一届监事会第六次会议审议通过了《关于增补第十 一届监事会非职工监事的议案》。公司大股东天府清源控股有限公司（其持有公司股份 71,084,278 股，占公司总股本的 4.99%，以下简称"天府清源"）就上述议案向公司发出《关 于增加 2025 年第一次临时股东大会临时提案的函》，天府清源提议将上述议案作为临时提案， 提交公司 2025 年第一次 ...

证券代码：000826 证券简称：启迪环境 公告编号：2025-055 启迪环境科技发展股份有限公司 第十一届监事会第六次会议决议公告 本公司及监事会全体成员保证公告内容的真实、准确和完整, 公告不存在虚假记载、误导性陈述或者重大遗漏。 启迪环境科技发展股份有限公司监事会 启迪环境科技发展股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）于 2025 年 9 月 18 日以电话及邮 件的方式向全体监事发出了"关于召开第十一届监事会第六次会议的通知"。本次监事会会 议于 2025 年 9 月 22 日以通讯方式进行表决并形成决议，本次会议应参加表决监事 3 名，实 际参加表决监事 3 名。本次会议的召集、召开程序等符合法律、法规、规章和《公司章程》 等有关规定。会议由监事会主席左薇薇女士主持，经过与会监事认真审议，表决通过了如下 决议： 一、审议通过《关于增补第十一届监事会非职工监事的议案》。 因周艳华女士已向公司提出辞职，天府清源控股有限公司已向公司监事会提交监事候选 人推荐书，推荐杨庆先生（简历附后）担任公司第十一届监事会非职工监事，任期与本届监 事会任期一致。 依据《公司法》、《深圳证券交易所股票上市规则》等相关法律法规和 ...

Core Viewpoint - Qidi Environment announced the resignation of employee representative supervisor Hu Ying due to personal reasons, and Qi Zhiping has been elected as the new employee representative supervisor for the 11th Supervisory Board [1] Group 1: Company Changes - Hu Ying has resigned from her position as employee representative supervisor and will no longer hold any position in the company after her resignation [1] - Qi Zhiping has been elected as the new employee representative supervisor through a hand vote by the employee representatives, with a term aligned with the 11th Supervisory Board [1] Group 2: Financial Performance - For the first half of 2025, Qidi Environment's revenue composition is as follows: sanitation business accounts for 53.48%, water supply and sewage treatment business accounts for 23.37%, municipal construction revenue accounts for 18.0%, environmental equipment installation and consulting accounts for 4.11%, and other businesses account for 1.04% [1] - As of the report date, Qidi Environment has a market capitalization of 3.3 billion yuan [1]

Core Viewpoint - The company, Qidi Environment Technology Development Co., Ltd., is currently facing significant legal challenges, with a total of 50.16 billion yuan in unresolved litigation and arbitration cases, which represents 208.85% of its latest audited net assets [2][6]. Group 1: Litigation and Arbitration Status - The company and its subsidiaries have accumulated unresolved litigation and arbitration cases amounting to 50.16 billion yuan, which includes 6.71 billion yuan from administrative lawsuits and construction disputes, and 43.45 billion yuan from being defendants in various cases [2][6]. - A recent civil mediation agreement was reached with Huaxia Financial Leasing Co., Ltd., where the company and a subsidiary agreed to pay a total of approximately 70.78 million yuan in rent and related fees by December 7, 2028 [3][4][5]. - The company has pending execution amounts totaling approximately 62.60 billion yuan from previous cases that have reached judgment or settlement [7]. Group 2: Financial Implications - The total amount of unresolved litigation and arbitration cases poses a significant financial burden on the company, impacting its liquidity and overall financial health [10]. - The company has been listed as a dishonest executor due to failure to timely pay certain amounts from previous judgments, which may further complicate its financial situation [8][9]. Group 3: Company Actions - The company is actively working to strengthen its receivables collection and asset disposal measures to mitigate litigation risks and fulfill judgment obligations [2][10]. - The company will continue to disclose information regarding the progress of litigation in accordance with regulatory requirements, urging investors to remain vigilant [10].

证券代码：000826 证券简称：启迪环境 公告编号：2025-054 启迪环境科技发展股份有限公司 关于涉及诉讼（仲裁）案件进展的公告 本公司及董事会全体成员保证公告内容的真实、准确和完整, （一）（2025）京 0102 民初 14392 号 公司于近日收到北京市西城区人民法院《民事调解书》（（2025）京 0102 民初 14392 号）， 主要内容如下： 原告：华夏金融租赁有限公司（以下简称"华夏金租"） 被告：咸阳逸清生物科技有限公司（以下简称"咸阳逸清"）、启迪环境科技发展股份有 限公司、启迪合加新能源汽车有限公司、浙江启迪生态科技有限公司 公告不存在虚假记载、误导性陈述或者重大遗漏。 重要提示： 1、截止目前，启迪环境科技发展股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"或"启迪环境"）及 控股子公司因行政诉讼、工程建设纠纷等经营事项提起诉讼累计未结、仲裁事项金额合计为 6.71 亿元；公司以及控股子公司因建设工程施工合同纠纷、债权债务诉讼、涉及证券虚假 陈述责任纠纷等事项为被告累计未结诉讼、仲裁事项金额合计为 43.45 亿元。 公司及控股子公司累计诉讼、仲裁事项金额合计 50.16 亿元，占本公司最近一期经 ...

Market Performance - The environmental governance sector rose by 0.97% on September 11, with Fu Jie Environmental leading the gains [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3875.31, up 1.65%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 12979.89, up 3.36% [1] Top Gainers in Environmental Governance - Fu Jie Environmental (688335) closed at 17.47, with a significant increase of 19.99% and a trading volume of 133,100 shares, amounting to 222 million yuan [1] - China Tianrong (000035) saw a rise of 9.92%, closing at 5.21 with a trading volume of 1,044,400 shares, totaling 531 million yuan [1] - Zhenghe Ecology (605069) increased by 6.60%, closing at 11.46 with a trading volume of 285,400 shares, amounting to 331 million yuan [1] Decliners in Environmental Governance - Green Yin Ecology (002887) decreased by 2.49%, closing at 9.79 with a trading volume of 112,700 shares, totaling 110 million yuan [2] - Qiaoyin Co. (002973) fell by 2.40%, closing at 15.03 with a trading volume of 77,500 shares, amounting to 116 million yuan [2] - Feinan Resources (301500) dropped by 1.40%, closing at 17.65 with a trading volume of 162,300 shares, totaling 28.5 million yuan [2] Capital Flow Analysis - The environmental governance sector experienced a net outflow of 397 million yuan from institutional investors, while retail investors saw a net inflow of 533 million yuan [2][3] - Major stocks like China Tianrong and Yuanda Environmental had mixed capital flows, with China Tianrong seeing a net inflow of 106 million yuan from institutional investors [3]

Group 1 - The largest shareholder of Qidi Environment is Tianfu Qingyuan Holdings Co., Ltd. and its concerted parties [2]

Group 1 - The company received an administrative penalty decision from the Xi'an Yanliang District Emergency Management Bureau, imposing a fine of 600,000 RMB for safety management violations [1][2]. - The violations included inadequate management responsibility and failure to establish a safety production agreement with Hunan Gardening Construction Group Co., Ltd., as well as insufficient safety inspections [1][3]. - The company has already paid the fine in full and stated that the penalty will not have a significant impact on its production and operational activities [3]. Group 2 - The company will continue to enhance its internal management and control levels, ensuring that its subsidiaries strictly comply with safety production laws and regulations [3]. - The penalty decision does not trigger any major violations that would lead to mandatory delisting under the Shenzhen Stock Exchange listing rules [3].

Core Viewpoint - Recently, Tsinghua Tongfang Environment (启迪环境) announced that its subsidiary received an administrative penalty notice from the Xi'an Yanliang District Emergency Management Bureau [1][2]. Group 1: Administrative Penalty Details - The penalty was issued to Xi'an Qihang Surface Treatment Center Construction and Operation Co., Ltd. for failing to implement unified management responsibilities and not having a safety production agreement with Hunan Gardening Construction Group Co., Ltd. [3] - The violations were based on the "Safety Production Law of the People's Republic of China," leading to a fine of 600,000 RMB [3]. - The company has fully paid the fine and stated that the administrative penalty did not have a significant impact on its production and operational activities [6]. Group 2: Company Response and Future Actions - The company will continue to enhance its internal management and control levels [6]. - There will be ongoing supervision of subsidiaries to ensure strict compliance with safety production laws and regulations [6].

Group 1 - The company received an administrative penalty of 600,000 RMB from the Xi'an Yanliang District Emergency Management Bureau for failing to implement unified management responsibilities and not having a safety production agreement with Hunan Gardening Construction Group Co., Ltd [1][2] - The penalty was based on violations of the Production Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, specifically Articles 4 and 49, and was enforced under Article 114, Clause 1 of the same law [1] - The company has already paid the fine in full and stated that the administrative penalty has not had a significant impact on its production and operational activities [2] Group 2 - The company will continue to enhance its internal management and control levels, ensuring that its subsidiaries strictly comply with safety production laws and regulations [2] - The company has confirmed that the penalty decision does not violate the Shenzhen Stock Exchange Listing Rules [2] - The company has designated specific media outlets for information disclosure, including China Securities Journal, Securities Times, Shanghai Securities Journal, and the Giant Tide Information Network [2][3]