Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a class action lawsuit against DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. due to significant stock price declines following disappointing financial results and allegations regarding the effectiveness of its services [1][5]. Financial Performance - On May 7, 2024, DoubleVerify reported its Q1 2024 financial results, reducing its 2024 revenue guidance due to a pullback in customer advertising spending, resulting in a stock price drop of $11.79, or 38.6%, closing at $18.78 per share on May 8, 2024 [2]. - On February 27, 2025, the company announced lower-than-expected Q4 2024 sales and earnings, with a stock price decline of $7.83, or 36%, closing at $13.90 per share on February 28, 2025 [3]. Allegations and Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit alleges that DoubleVerify made materially false and misleading statements and failed to disclose adverse facts about its business, including: - Customers shifting ad spending to closed platforms where DoubleVerify's capabilities are limited [5]. - High costs and time required for developing technology for closed platforms [5]. - Competitors being better positioned to incorporate AI, impacting DoubleVerify's competitiveness [5]. - Systematic overbilling of customers for ad impressions served to bots [5]. - Misleading risk disclosures that characterized adverse facts as mere possibilities [5]. Class Action Participation - Investors who purchased DoubleVerify securities during the specified class period may file a lead plaintiff motion by July 21, 2025 [6].

Core Viewpoint - The DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. is facing a class action lawsuit alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, with claims of misleading statements and undisclosed risks impacting the company's stock performance during the specified class period [1][3]. Company Allegations - The lawsuit claims that DoubleVerify's customers shifted ad spending from open exchanges to closed platforms, where the company's technological capabilities were limited, affecting its competitive position [3]. - It is alleged that the development of technology for closed platforms was more expensive and time-consuming than disclosed, limiting DoubleVerify's ability to monetize its Activation Services [3]. - Competitors were reportedly better positioned to incorporate AI into their offerings, which negatively impacted DoubleVerify's profits and competitive edge [3]. - The company is accused of systematically overbilling customers for ad impressions served to bots, and its risk disclosures were misleading, presenting adverse facts as mere possibilities [3]. Stock Performance Impact - Following a lower revenue growth expectation announcement on February 28, 2024, DoubleVerify's stock price fell over 21% [4]. - On May 7, 2024, after cutting its full-year 2024 revenue outlook due to reduced customer ad spending, the stock price dropped nearly 39% [5]. - A report on February 27, 2025, detailing lower-than-expected sales and earnings due to reduced customer spending led to a further stock price decline of more than 36% [6]. Legal Process - Investors who purchased DoubleVerify common stock during the class period can seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the class action lawsuit, representing the interests of all class members [7].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. for misleading statements and failure to disclose critical information regarding its business operations and competitive position during the Class Period from November 10, 2023, to February 27, 2025 [1][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that DoubleVerify's customers shifted ad spending from open exchanges to closed platforms, limiting the company's technological capabilities and competition with platforms like Meta and Amazon [5]. - It is alleged that DoubleVerify's high-margin Activation Services faced significant development costs and time delays, impacting monetization efforts [5]. - The lawsuit states that DoubleVerify's competitors were better positioned to integrate AI into their offerings, adversely affecting DoubleVerify's profitability [5]. Group 2: Investor Information - Investors who purchased DoubleVerify common stock during the Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - To participate in the class action, investors can submit their information through the provided link or contact the law firm directly [3][6]. - A lead plaintiff must be appointed by July 21, 2025, to represent the interests of other class members in the litigation [1][3]. Group 3: Law Firm Credentials - The Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved significant settlements, including the largest against a Chinese company at the time [4]. - The firm has consistently ranked among the top firms for securities class action settlements and has recovered hundreds of millions for investors [4]. - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, showcasing its effectiveness in representing shareholder interests [4].

Core Viewpoint - The DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. is facing a class action lawsuit alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, with claims of misleading statements and failure to disclose critical business challenges during the class period from November 10, 2023, to February 27, 2025 [1][3]. Group 1: Allegations of the Lawsuit - The lawsuit claims that DoubleVerify's customers shifted ad spending from open exchanges to closed platforms, where the company's capabilities were limited [3]. - It is alleged that the monetization of DoubleVerify's Activation Services was hindered by the high costs and time required to develop technology for closed platforms [3]. - The lawsuit states that competitors were better positioned to integrate AI into their offerings, negatively impacting DoubleVerify's competitive edge and profitability [3]. - DoubleVerify is accused of systematically overbilling customers for ad impressions served to bots [3]. - The risk disclosures provided by DoubleVerify were claimed to be materially false and misleading, presenting adverse facts as mere possibilities [3]. Group 2: Impact on Stock Price - Following the announcement of lower revenue growth expectations on February 28, 2024, DoubleVerify's stock price fell over 21% [4]. - On May 7, 2024, after cutting its full-year 2024 revenue outlook, the stock price dropped nearly 39% [5]. - On February 27, 2025, the company reported lower-than-expected sales and earnings, leading to a further decline of more than 36% in stock price [6]. Group 3: Legal Process and Representation - Investors who purchased DoubleVerify common stock during the class period can seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the class action lawsuit [7]. - The lead plaintiff will represent the interests of all class members and can select a law firm of their choice for litigation [7]. Group 4: About Robbins Geller - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a leading law firm specializing in securities fraud and shareholder litigation, having secured over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [8][9].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. for alleged securities fraud and unlawful business practices [2][3]. Company Performance - On February 28, 2024, DoubleVerify lowered its revenue growth expectations for Q1 2024, leading to a stock price drop of $8.35, or 21.3%, closing at $30.89 on February 29, 2024 [3]. - On May 7, 2024, the company cut its full-year 2024 revenue outlook due to reduced ad spending from customers, resulting in a stock price decline of $11.79, or 38.6%, closing at $18.78 on May 8, 2024 [4]. - On February 27, 2025, DoubleVerify reported lower-than-expected Q4 2024 sales and earnings, attributed to reduced customer spending and a shift in ad dollars, causing a stock price drop of approximately 36% to close at $13.90 on February 28, 2025 [5]. Industry Concerns - On March 28, 2025, Adalytics Research, LLC released a report claiming that DoubleVerify's advertisement verification services are ineffective, stating that customers are billed for ad impressions served to bots [6]. - The Wall Street Journal reported that DoubleVerify frequently fails to detect nonhuman traffic, contradicting the company's claims of helping brands avoid serving ads to bot accounts [6].

Core Viewpoint - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP is investigating potential claims against DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. due to allegations of misleading statements and failure to disclose critical information affecting investors [2][4]. Group 1: Allegations Against DoubleVerify - The complaint alleges that DoubleVerify's customers are shifting ad spending from open exchanges to closed platforms, where the company's technological capabilities are limited [4]. - It is claimed that DoubleVerify's ability to monetize its high-margin Activation Services is constrained due to the high costs and time required for technology development for closed platforms [4]. - The complaint states that DoubleVerify's competitors are better positioned to incorporate AI into their offerings, negatively impacting DoubleVerify's competitive edge and profitability [4]. - Allegations include that DoubleVerify systematically overbilled customers for ad impressions served to declared bots, and that risk disclosures were materially false and misleading [4]. Group 2: Impact of Disclosures - The truth about the alleged fraud was revealed through disclosures in February and March 2025, leading to a significant stock price drop of 36% following disappointing earnings [5]. - A report from Adalytics Research in March 2025 claimed that DoubleVerify's services were ineffective, further damaging investor confidence [5]. Group 3: Legal Proceedings - Investors who suffered losses in DoubleVerify are encouraged to contact Faruqi & Faruqi to discuss their legal rights and options for participating in a federal securities class action [1][2]. - The deadline for seeking the role of lead plaintiff in the class action is set for July 21, 2025 [2].

Core Viewpoint - Robbins LLP has initiated a class action lawsuit on behalf of investors who acquired DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. common stock during a specified period, alleging that the company misled investors regarding its business prospects and financial performance [1][2]. Allegations - The lawsuit claims that DoubleVerify failed to disclose significant shifts in customer ad spending from open exchanges to closed platforms, where the company's capabilities were limited [2]. - It is alleged that the costs and time required to develop technology for closed platforms were significantly underestimated, impacting the monetization of DoubleVerify's Activation Services [2]. - The complaint states that competitors were better positioned to leverage AI in their offerings, adversely affecting DoubleVerify's competitive stance and profitability [2]. - DoubleVerify is accused of systematically overbilling customers for ad impressions served to bots, which raises concerns about the integrity of its billing practices [2]. - The risk disclosures provided by DoubleVerify were claimed to be materially false and misleading, as they downplayed already realized adverse facts [2]. Impact of Disclosure - The truth about DoubleVerify's business challenges was revealed on February 27, 2025, when the company reported lower-than-expected sales and earnings, leading to a significant stock price drop of $7.83 per share, or 36%, from $21.73 to $13.90 [3]. Next Steps for Shareholders - Shareholders interested in participating as lead plaintiffs in the class action must file their papers by July 15, 2025, although participation is not required to be eligible for recovery [4]. Company Background - Robbins LLP has been recognized for its efforts in shareholder rights litigation, focusing on helping shareholders recover losses and improve corporate governance since 2002 [5].

Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. alleging securities fraud that negatively impacted investors between November 10, 2023, and February 27, 2025 [1] Group 1: Allegations of the Lawsuit - The lawsuit claims that DoubleVerify's customers shifted ad spending from open exchanges to closed platforms, where the company's technological capabilities were limited [2] - It is alleged that the monetization of DoubleVerify's Activation Services was constrained due to the high costs and time required for technology development for closed platforms [2] - The complaint states that it would take several years for DoubleVerify's Activation Services related to certain closed platforms to become profitable [2] - Competitors of DoubleVerify were reportedly better positioned to integrate AI into their offerings on closed platforms, which negatively affected DoubleVerify's competitive stance and profitability [2] - The company is accused of systematically overbilling customers for ad impressions served to declared bots operating from known data center server farms [2] - The risk disclosures provided by DoubleVerify were claimed to be materially false and misleading, presenting adverse facts as mere possibilities [2] - As a result of these issues, the positive statements made by the defendants regarding the company's business and prospects were deemed materially false or misleading [2] Group 2: Next Steps for Investors - Investors who suffered losses in DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. during the specified timeframe have until July 21, 2025, to request appointment as lead plaintiff [3] - Participation in the lawsuit does not require serving as a lead plaintiff, and class members may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket costs [3] Group 3: Firm Background - Levi & Korsinsky, LLP has a history of securing hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders and has been recognized as one of the top securities litigation firms in the United States for seven consecutive years [4]

Core Viewpoint - A securities class action lawsuit has been filed against DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. for alleged misrepresentations that led to significant stock price drops during the class period from November 10, 2023, to February 27, 2025 [1]. Allegations Summary - Ad Spend Shift: Customers shifted advertising spending from open exchanges to closed platforms, where DoubleVerify's technology was less effective and faced increased competition [7]. - Technology Development Costs: The costs and time required for developing technology for closed platforms were higher than disclosed by the company [7]. - Monetization Timeline: The timeline for monetizing Activation Services on closed platforms was projected to take several years [7]. - AI Competitiveness: Competitors were better positioned to integrate AI, which negatively impacted DoubleVerify's competitive edge and profitability [7]. - Overbilling: The company allegedly overbilled customers for ad impressions served to declared bots operating from data center server farms [7]. - Misleading Risk Disclosures: The company misrepresented existing problems as hypothetical risks in its disclosures [7]. - Misleading Positive Statements: False or misleading statements were made regarding the company's operations and future prospects [7]. Stock Performance - February 28, 2024: The stock fell over 21% after announcing lower Q1 2024 revenue growth expectations [7]. - May 7, 2024: The stock plunged nearly 39% after cutting the full-year 2024 revenue outlook [7]. - February 27, 2025: The stock dropped 36% following disappointing Q4 2024 results [7].

Core Viewpoint - A securities class action lawsuit has been filed against DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. for allegedly making false and misleading statements regarding its business operations and financial performance during the class period from November 10, 2023, to February 27, 2025 [1] Group 1: Allegations Against the Company - The lawsuit claims that the company's customers were shifting ad spending from open exchanges to closed platforms, where DoubleVerify's technological capabilities were limited [2] - It is alleged that the company's ability to monetize its high-margin Activation Services was constrained due to the high costs and time required for technology development for closed platforms [2] - The complaint states that monetization of Activation Services on certain closed platforms would take several years, contrary to what was disclosed to investors [2] - Competitors were reportedly better positioned to integrate AI into their offerings on closed platforms, negatively impacting DoubleVerify's competitive stance and profitability [2] - The company is accused of systematically overbilling customers for ad impressions served to declared bots operating from known data center server farms [2] - The risk disclosures provided by the company were claimed to be materially false and misleading, presenting adverse facts as mere possibilities [2] - As a result of these issues, the positive statements made by the company regarding its business and prospects were deemed materially false or misleading [2] Group 2: Investor Information - Investors who acquired shares of DoubleVerify are encouraged to contact the law firm before the lead plaintiff motion deadline of July 15, 2025 [3]