DoubleVerify Holdings (DV) came out with quarterly earnings of $0.05 per share, missing the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $0.06 per share. This compares to earnings of $0.04 per share a year ago. These figures are adjusted for non-recurring items.This quarterly report represents an earnings surprise of -16.67%. A quarter ago, it was expected that this software platform for digital media measurement and analytics would post earnings of $0.02 per share when it actually produced earnings of $0.01, delivering a s ...

DoubleVerify (DV) Q2 2025 Earnings Call August 05, 2025 04:30 PM ET Company ParticipantsTejal Engman - SVP - IRMark Zagorski - CEO & DirectorNicola Allais - CFOMatthew Swanson - Director - Equity ResearchYoussef Squali - MD & Head of Internet and Digital Media Research GroupMark Murphy - Managing DirectorBrian Pitz - Managing DirectorMatthew Condon - Director Equity Research - Internet & Digital MediaEric Sheridan - Managing DirectorAlinda Li - Equity Research Associate - TechMark Kelley - MD - InternetAlec ...

DoubleVerify (DV) Q2 2025 Earnings Call August 05, 2025 04:30 PM ET Speaker0Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. My name is Krista, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Double Verify Holdings Second Quarter twenty twenty five Earnings Conference Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers' remarks, there will be a question and answer session.Thank you. I will now like to turn the confe ...

Q2 2025 Earnings Call August 5, 2025 0 Disclaimer This presentation contains "forward-looking statements" that are based on management's beliefs and assumptions and on information currently available to management. These forward- looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions and other statements contained herein that are not historical facts. When used herein, the words "expects," "anticipates," "intends," "plans," "believes," "seeks, ...

Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number: 001-40349 DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q (Mark One) ☒ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2025 or ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES (212) 631-2111 (Regis ...

NEW YORK – August 5, 2025 – DoubleVerify ("DV") (NYSE: DV), the leading software platform for digital media measurement, data, and analytics, today announced financial results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2025. "We drove 21% year-over-year growth in Q2, significantly outperforming the revenue expectations we raised at Innovation Day and building momentum across all key areas of the business," said Mark Zagorski, CEO of DoubleVerify. "DV is executing well across every key growth vector, with Social ...

Dolly Varden Silver Increases Scope of 2025 Kitsault Valley Drill Program to 55,000 Meters, Adds Fifth DrillJuly 24, 2025 8:00 AM EDT | Source: Dolly Varden Silver CorporationVancouver, British Columbia--(Newsfile Corp. - July 24, 2025) - Dolly Varden Silver Corporation (TSXV: DV) (NYSE American: DVS) (FSE: DVQ) (the "Company" or "Dolly Varden") has increased the previously announced 35,000 meter, drill program to 55,000 meters. Drilling will prioritize the Wolf vein extension, where the Compa ...

Core Viewpoint - The Gross Law Firm has issued a notice to shareholders of DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. regarding a class action lawsuit due to alleged misleading statements and failure to disclose critical information during the class period from November 10, 2023, to February 27, 2025 [1][3]. Allegations - Allegations include that DoubleVerify's customers shifted ad spending to closed platforms, limiting the company's technological capabilities and competing with tools from Meta Platforms and Amazon [3]. - The complaint states that the monetization of DoubleVerify's Activation Services was hindered by the high costs and time required for technology development for closed platforms [3]. - It is claimed that monetization of these services would take several years, and competitors were better positioned to integrate AI, negatively impacting DoubleVerify's competitiveness and profits [3]. - The company allegedly overbilled customers for ad impressions served to bots, and its risk disclosures were misleading, presenting adverse facts as mere possibilities [3]. - As a result, the positive statements made by the defendants regarding the company's business and prospects were deemed materially false or misleading [3]. Next Steps for Shareholders - Shareholders are encouraged to register for the class action by the deadline of July 21, 2025, to participate in the case without any cost or obligation [4]. - Registered shareholders will receive updates through a portfolio monitoring software throughout the lifecycle of the case [4]. Law Firm Background - The Gross Law Firm is recognized nationally for class action lawsuits, focusing on protecting investors from deceit and illegal business practices [5]. - The firm aims to ensure companies adhere to responsible business practices and seeks recovery for investors who suffered losses due to misleading statements [5].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. common stock during the specified Class Period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on July 21, 2025 [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased DoubleVerify common stock between November 10, 2023, and February 27, 2025, may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by July 21, 2025 [3] - Investors are encouraged to select qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions [4] Group 2: Allegations Against DoubleVerify - The lawsuit alleges that DoubleVerify made false and misleading statements regarding its business operations, including the shift of customer ad spending to closed platforms where its capabilities were limited [5] - It is claimed that DoubleVerify's high-margin Activation Services faced significant challenges in monetization due to the high costs and time required for technology development on closed platforms [5] - The lawsuit also states that DoubleVerify systematically overbilled customers for ad impressions served to declared bots, and its risk disclosures were materially misleading [5]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. common stock during the specified class period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit [1][3]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought DoubleVerify common stock between November 10, 2023, and February 27, 2025, may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by July 21, 2025 [3]. Group 2: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that DoubleVerify made false and misleading statements regarding its business operations, including the shift of customers' ad spending to closed platforms where DoubleVerify's capabilities were limited [5]. - It is claimed that the development of technology for closed platforms was more expensive and time-consuming than disclosed, impacting the monetization of DoubleVerify's high-margin advertising optimization services [5]. - The lawsuit also states that DoubleVerify's competitors were better positioned to incorporate AI into their offerings, adversely affecting DoubleVerify's competitive edge and profits [5]. - Additional allegations include systematic overbilling of customers for ad impressions served to declared bots and misleading risk disclosures that characterized adverse facts as mere possibilities [5].