Core Viewpoint - The Gross Law Firm has issued a notice to shareholders of DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. regarding a class action lawsuit alleging that the company made materially false and misleading statements during the class period from November 10, 2023, to February 27, 2025 [1] Allegations - Allegations include that DoubleVerify's customers shifted ad spending from open exchanges to closed platforms, limiting the company's technological capabilities [1] - The complaint states that the monetization of DoubleVerify's Activation Services was hindered due to the high costs and time required for technology development for closed platforms [1] - It is claimed that monetization of these services would take several years, impacting the company's profitability [1] - Competitors were reportedly better positioned to integrate AI into their offerings on closed platforms, further impairing DoubleVerify's competitive edge [1] - The company allegedly overbilled customers for ad impressions served to bots operating from known data centers [1] - Risk disclosures from DoubleVerify were characterized as materially false and misleading, presenting adverse facts as mere possibilities [1] - As a result of these issues, positive statements made by the defendants regarding the company's business and prospects were deemed materially false or misleading [1] Next Steps for Shareholders - Shareholders are encouraged to register for the class action by July 21, 2025, to participate in the case without any cost or obligation [2] - Registered shareholders will receive updates through a portfolio monitoring software throughout the lifecycle of the case [2]

Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. alleging securities fraud that affected investors between November 10, 2023, and February 27, 2025 [1][2]. Case Details - The lawsuit claims that DoubleVerify's customers are shifting ad spending from open exchanges to closed platforms, where the company's technological capabilities are limited and face competition from native tools of platforms like Meta and Amazon [2]. - It is alleged that DoubleVerify's ability to monetize its Activation Services is constrained due to the high costs and time required for technology development for closed platforms [2]. - The complaint states that monetization of DoubleVerify's Activation Services on certain closed platforms could take several years [2]. - Competitors are reportedly better positioned to integrate AI into their offerings on closed platforms, negatively impacting DoubleVerify's competitive stance and profitability [2]. - The lawsuit also alleges that DoubleVerify overbilled customers for ad impressions served to bots operating from known data centers [2]. - It is claimed that DoubleVerify's risk disclosures were misleading, presenting adverse facts as mere possibilities [2]. - As a result of these issues, the positive statements made by the defendants regarding the company's business and prospects are said to be materially false or misleading [2]. Next Steps - Investors who suffered losses in DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. during the specified timeframe have until July 21, 2025, to request appointment as lead plaintiff, although participation in any recovery does not require this [3]. - Class members may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket costs or fees [3]. Why Levi & Korsinsky - Levi & Korsinsky has a history of securing significant compensation for shareholders and has extensive experience in complex securities litigation [4]. - The firm has been recognized in ISS Securities Class Action Services' Top 50 Report for seven consecutive years as a leading securities litigation firm in the U.S. [4].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. for allegedly misleading investors regarding the company's performance and competitive position during the class period from November 10, 2023, to February 27, 2025 [1][3]. Group 1: Allegations Against DoubleVerify - The lawsuit claims that DoubleVerify misrepresented the shift of its customers' ad spending from open exchanges to closed platforms, where the company's capabilities were limited and faced competition from platforms like Meta and Amazon [3]. - It is alleged that developing technology for closed platforms was more costly and time-consuming than communicated to investors [3]. - The monetization of Activation Services on closed platforms was expected to take several years, contrary to the company's claims [3]. - Competitors were reportedly better positioned to implement AI solutions on closed platforms, affecting DoubleVerify's competitiveness and profitability [3]. - The company allegedly overbilled customers for ad impressions served to known bots, impacting its financial integrity [3]. - Risk disclosures from DoubleVerify were claimed to be misleading, presenting ongoing issues as hypothetical risks [3]. Group 2: Impact on Stock Price - On February 28, 2024, DoubleVerify issued lower-than-expected Q1 2024 revenue growth guidance, leading to a stock drop of over 21% [4]. - On May 7, 2024, the company cut its full-year 2024 revenue outlook due to reduced ad spending, resulting in a nearly 39% decline in stock price [5]. - On February 27, 2025, disappointing Q4 2024 earnings were reported, revealing the negative impact of the shift to closed platforms, causing shares to fall more than 36% [5].

Core Viewpoint - The Gross Law Firm has issued a notice to shareholders of DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. regarding a class action lawsuit due to alleged misleading statements and failure to disclose critical information during the class period from November 10, 2023, to February 27, 2025 [1][3]. Allegations - The complaint alleges that DoubleVerify's customers shifted ad spending from open exchanges to closed platforms, where the company's technological capabilities were limited, impacting its competitive position against platforms like Meta and Amazon [3]. - It is claimed that DoubleVerify's ability to monetize its Activation Services was constrained due to the high costs and time required for technology development for closed platforms, which were not adequately disclosed to investors [3]. - The lawsuit states that monetization of DoubleVerify's Activation Services on certain closed platforms would take several years, contrary to what was communicated to shareholders [3]. - Competitors of DoubleVerify were reportedly better positioned to integrate AI into their offerings on closed platforms, negatively affecting DoubleVerify's competitiveness and profitability [3]. - The company allegedly overbilled customers for ad impressions served to bots operating from known data center server farms, raising concerns about its billing practices [3]. - The risk disclosures provided by DoubleVerify were claimed to be materially false and misleading, as they downplayed already materialized adverse facts [3]. - As a result of these issues, the positive statements made by the defendants regarding the company's business and prospects were deemed materially false or misleading [3]. Next Steps for Shareholders - Shareholders who purchased shares of DoubleVerify during the specified class period are encouraged to register for the class action by July 21, 2025, to participate in potential recovery efforts [4]. - Once registered, shareholders will receive updates through a portfolio monitoring software regarding the status of the case [4].

Core Viewpoint - The Gross Law Firm has issued a notice to shareholders of DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. regarding a class action lawsuit alleging that the company made materially false and misleading statements during the class period from November 10, 2023, to February 27, 2025 [1]. Allegations - Allegations include that DoubleVerify's customers shifted ad spending to closed platforms, limiting the company's technological capabilities and competition with platforms like Meta and Amazon [1]. - The complaint states that the monetization of DoubleVerify's Activation Services was hindered due to the high costs and time required for technology development for closed platforms [1]. - It is claimed that monetization of these services would take several years, impacting the company's profitability [1]. - Competitors were reportedly better positioned to integrate AI into their offerings, further impairing DoubleVerify's competitive edge [1]. - The company allegedly overbilled customers for ad impressions served to bots, raising concerns about its billing practices [1]. - Risk disclosures from DoubleVerify were characterized as misleading, presenting adverse facts as mere possibilities [1]. - As a result of these issues, the positive statements made by the defendants regarding the company's business and prospects were deemed materially false or misleading [1]. Next Steps for Shareholders - Shareholders are encouraged to register for the class action by July 21, 2025, to participate in the case without any cost or obligation [2]. - Registered shareholders will receive updates through a portfolio monitoring software throughout the lifecycle of the case [2]. About the Law Firm - The Gross Law Firm is a nationally recognized class action law firm focused on protecting investors' rights against deceit and fraud [3]. - The firm aims to ensure companies adhere to responsible business practices and seeks recovery for investors who suffered losses due to misleading statements [3].

Core Viewpoint - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP is investigating potential claims against DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. due to allegations of misleading statements and failure to disclose critical information that negatively impacted investors [3][5]. Group 1: Allegations Against DoubleVerify - The complaint alleges that DoubleVerify's customers shifted ad spending from open exchanges to closed platforms, where the company's technological capabilities were limited [5]. - It is claimed that DoubleVerify's ability to monetize its high-margin Activation Services was constrained due to the expensive and time-consuming development of technology for closed platforms [5]. - The complaint states that DoubleVerify's competitors were better positioned to incorporate AI into their offerings, adversely affecting the company's profits [5]. Group 2: Impact of Allegations - The truth about DoubleVerify's performance was revealed on February 27, 2025, when the company reported lower-than-expected sales and earnings, leading to a significant stock price drop of $7.83 per share, or 36% [6]. - The decline in stock price was attributed to reduced customer spending and the suspension of services by a large customer, alongside the shift of ad dollars negatively impacting the company [6]. Group 3: Legal Proceedings - Investors who suffered losses exceeding $75,000 between November 10, 2023, and February 27, 2025, are encouraged to contact Faruqi & Faruqi to discuss their legal rights [1]. - There is a deadline of July 21, 2025, for investors to seek the role of lead plaintiff in the federal securities class action against DoubleVerify [3][7].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. common stock during the specified Class Period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit [1][3]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought DoubleVerify common stock between November 10, 2023, and February 27, 2025, may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by July 21, 2025 [3]. Group 2: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that DoubleVerify made false and misleading statements regarding its business operations, including the shift of customers' ad spending to closed platforms where DoubleVerify's capabilities were limited [5]. - It is claimed that the company overbilled customers for ad impressions served to declared bots and that its risk disclosures were materially false and misleading [5]. - The lawsuit asserts that the defendants' positive statements about DoubleVerify's business lacked a reasonable basis, leading to investor damages when the true details became public [5]. Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company at the time and being ranked No. 1 for the number of settlements in 2017 [4]. - The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors, securing over $438 million in 2019 alone [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. common stock during the specified Class Period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought DoubleVerify common stock between November 10, 2023, and February 27, 2025, may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and those wishing to serve as lead plaintiff must act by July 21, 2025 [3]. - Investors can join the class action by visiting the provided link or contacting the law firm directly for more information [6]. Group 2: Legal Representation - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a proven track record in securities class actions, highlighting their own success in recovering significant amounts for investors [4]. - The firm has been recognized for its leadership in securities class action settlements, achieving the largest settlement against a Chinese company at the time and securing over $438 million for investors in 2019 alone [4]. Group 3: Allegations Against DoubleVerify - The lawsuit alleges that DoubleVerify made false and misleading statements regarding its business operations, including the shift of customer ad spending to closed platforms where its capabilities were limited [5]. - It is claimed that DoubleVerify's high-margin advertising optimization services faced significant challenges in monetization due to the high costs and time required for technology development on closed platforms [5]. - The lawsuit also points out that DoubleVerify overbilled customers for ad impressions served to bots and that its risk disclosures were misleading, leading to investor damages when the true situation was revealed [5].

Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. alleging securities fraud that negatively impacted investors between November 10, 2023, and February 27, 2025 [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations of Fraud - The lawsuit claims that DoubleVerify's customers were shifting ad spending to closed platforms, limiting the company's technological capabilities and competing directly with tools from Meta Platforms and Amazon [2]. - It is alleged that the monetization of DoubleVerify's Activation Services was hindered due to the high costs and time required for technology development for closed platforms [2]. - The complaint states that DoubleVerify's competitors were better positioned to integrate AI into their offerings, adversely affecting the company's competitive edge and profits [2]. - The company is accused of systematically overbilling customers for ad impressions served to bots operating from known data centers [2]. - The risk disclosures provided by DoubleVerify were claimed to be materially false and misleading, presenting adverse facts as mere possibilities [2]. Group 2: Legal Process and Participation - Investors who suffered losses during the specified timeframe have until July 21, 2025, to request appointment as lead plaintiff, although participation in any recovery does not require this role [3]. - Class members may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket costs or fees, with no obligation to participate [3]. Group 3: Firm Background - Levi & Korsinsky, LLP has a history of securing hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders and is recognized as one of the top securities litigation firms in the United States [4].

Core Viewpoint - The Gross Law Firm has issued a notice to shareholders of DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. regarding a class action lawsuit due to alleged misleading statements and failure to disclose critical information during the class period from November 10, 2023, to February 27, 2025 [1][3]. Allegations - The complaint alleges that DoubleVerify's customers shifted ad spending from open exchanges to closed platforms, where the company's technological capabilities were limited, impacting its competitive position against platforms like Meta and Amazon [3]. - It is claimed that DoubleVerify's ability to monetize its Activation Services was constrained due to the high costs and time required for technology development for closed platforms, which were not adequately disclosed to investors [3]. - The lawsuit states that monetization of DoubleVerify's Activation Services on certain closed platforms would take several years, contrary to what was communicated to shareholders [3]. - Competitors were reportedly better positioned to integrate AI into their offerings on closed platforms, negatively affecting DoubleVerify's competitiveness and profitability [3]. - The company allegedly overbilled customers for ad impressions served to bots, which were known to operate from data center server farms [3]. - The risk disclosures provided by DoubleVerify were claimed to be materially false and misleading, as they downplayed already materialized adverse facts [3]. - As a result of these issues, the positive statements made by the defendants regarding the company's business and prospects were deemed materially false or misleading [3]. Next Steps for Shareholders - Shareholders who purchased shares of DoubleVerify during the specified class period are encouraged to register for the class action by July 21, 2025, to participate in potential recovery [4]. - Once registered, shareholders will receive updates through a portfolio monitoring software regarding the status of the case [4].