Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. alleging securities fraud affecting investors between November 10, 2023, and February 27, 2025 [1] Group 1: Allegations of the Lawsuit - The lawsuit claims that DoubleVerify's customers are shifting ad spending from open exchanges to closed platforms, limiting the company's technological capabilities and increasing competition from platforms like Meta and Amazon [2] - It is alleged that DoubleVerify's ability to monetize its Activation Services is constrained due to the high costs and time required for technology development for closed platforms [2] - The complaint states that monetization of DoubleVerify's Activation Services on certain closed platforms could take several years [2] - Competitors are reportedly better positioned to integrate AI into their offerings on closed platforms, negatively impacting DoubleVerify's competitive edge and profitability [2] - The company is accused of systematically overbilling customers for ad impressions served to declared bots from known data center server farms [2] - The risk disclosures provided by DoubleVerify are claimed to be materially false and misleading, presenting adverse facts as mere possibilities [2] - As a result of these issues, the lawsuit asserts that the positive statements made by the defendants regarding the company's business and prospects were materially false or lacked a reasonable basis [2] Group 2: Next Steps for Affected Investors - Investors who suffered losses in DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. during the specified timeframe have until July 21, 2025, to request appointment as lead plaintiff [3] - Participation in the lawsuit does not require serving as a lead plaintiff, and class members may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket costs [3] Group 3: Firm Background - Levi & Korsinsky, LLP has a history of securing hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders and has extensive expertise in complex securities litigation [4] - The firm has been recognized in ISS Securities Class Action Services' Top 50 Report for seven consecutive years as one of the leading securities litigation firms in the United States [4]

Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. alleging securities fraud affecting investors between November 10, 2023, and February 27, 2025 [1] Group 1: Allegations of the Lawsuit - The lawsuit claims that DoubleVerify's customers are shifting ad spending from open exchanges to closed platforms, where the company's technological capabilities are limited [2] - It is alleged that DoubleVerify's ability to monetize its Activation Services is constrained due to the high costs and time required for technology development for closed platforms [2] - The complaint states that monetization of DoubleVerify's Activation Services on certain closed platforms would take several years [2] - Competitors are reportedly better positioned to integrate AI into their offerings on closed platforms, negatively impacting DoubleVerify's competitive edge and profits [2] - The company is accused of systematically overbilling customers for ad impressions served to declared bots from known data center server farms [2] - DoubleVerify's risk disclosures are claimed to be materially false and misleading, presenting adverse facts as mere possibilities [2] - As a result of these issues, the lawsuit asserts that the defendants' positive statements regarding the company's business and prospects were materially false or lacked a reasonable basis [2] Group 2: Next Steps for Affected Investors - Investors who suffered losses in DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. during the specified timeframe have until July 21, 2025, to request appointment as lead plaintiff [3] - Participation in the lawsuit does not require serving as a lead plaintiff, and class members may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket costs [3] Group 3: Firm Background - Levi & Korsinsky, LLP has a history of securing hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders and has extensive expertise in complex securities litigation [4] - The firm has been recognized in ISS Securities Class Action Services' Top 50 Report for seven consecutive years as one of the leading securities litigation firms in the United States [4]

Financial Performance & Growth - The company delivered profitable revenue growth, maintaining a "+40% Rule Of" since its IPO in 2021[16] - The company's core business is strong and growing, with a 17% growth in the first half of 2025[19, 283] - Q2 2025 revenue is expected to grow approximately 17% year-over-year, with revenue between $180 million and $184 million[267] - The company's adjusted EBITDA for FY 2025 is expected to be between $52 million and $56 million, with a margin of approximately 32%[267] Platform & Product Innovation - The company is expanding into media optimization and performance measurement via the DV Media AdVantage Platform (MAP), expanding its total addressable market (TAM)[19, 20] - The company launched suitability measurement and activation on Meta and TikTok[18] - The company's CTV measurement volumes have grown from 5% to 11%[18] - The company's AI-powered implementations have doubled, accelerating some development cycles by 20X[18] Market Opportunity & Strategy - The company estimates its total addressable market (TAM) to be $27 billion+, including verification ($21 billion), optimization ($1 billion), and outcomes ($5 billion)[39, 40] - The company is expanding its reach across channels (Social, CTV, retail media), customers (large advertisers, mid-market, performance marketers), and the full-funnel (brand metrics to business outcomes)[48] AI & Data Advantage - The company possesses an independent, differentiated, and scaled proprietary data set to leverage AI, processing 300 billion+ daily signals[45, 46, 204] - The company's hybrid AI approach combines rules-based systems, neural networks, traditional ML, and LLMs for customizable, multimodal, scalable, auditable, and agentic solutions[220] DV Authentic AdVantage & Social Media - 87% of consumers expect brands to avoid unsafe content, and 2/3 will walk away if they don't[84] - A CPG brand using DV Authentic AdVantage saw a 35% decrease in media CPM, a 60% increase in impression volume, and a 10% increase in suitability score[118] - A global footwear company using DV Authentic AdVantage Pre-Bid & Scibids on YouTube experienced a 70% lower cost, a 200% greater volume, and a 30% greater suitability score[124] DV Scibids AI & Outcomes - The company has scaled and upsold DV Scibids AI to 200 clients[144] - DV Scibids AI has driven an average increase of 4x in client ROI and a 67% increase in campaigns optimized[144] - Icelandair maximized bookings at the lowest possible cost, achieving a 10.4x DV Scibids ROI and a 70% reduction in CPA after implementing DV Scibids[145]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. common stock during the specified Class Period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought DoubleVerify common stock between November 10, 2023, and February 27, 2025, may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by July 21, 2025 [3]. - The Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions [4]. Group 2: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that DoubleVerify made false and misleading statements regarding its business operations, including the shift of customers' ad spending to closed platforms where DoubleVerify's capabilities were limited [5]. - It is claimed that DoubleVerify's high-margin advertising optimization services faced significant challenges in monetization due to the high costs and time required for technology development on closed platforms [5]. - The lawsuit also states that DoubleVerify systematically overbilled customers for ad impressions served to declared bots, and that its risk disclosures were materially misleading [5].

Core Viewpoint - The Gross Law Firm has issued a notice to shareholders of DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. regarding a class action lawsuit due to alleged misleading statements and failure to disclose critical information during the class period from November 10, 2023, to February 27, 2025 [1][3]. Allegations - The complaint alleges that DoubleVerify's customers shifted ad spending from open exchanges to closed platforms, where the company's technological capabilities were limited, impacting its competitive position against platforms like Meta and Amazon [3]. - It is claimed that the monetization of DoubleVerify's Activation Services was hindered by the high costs and time required to develop technology for closed platforms, which were not adequately disclosed to investors [3]. - The lawsuit states that it would take several years for DoubleVerify's Activation Services related to certain closed platforms to become profitable [3]. - Competitors were reportedly better positioned to integrate AI into their offerings on closed platforms, negatively affecting DoubleVerify's competitiveness and profitability [3]. - The company allegedly overbilled customers for ad impressions served to bots operating from known data centers [3]. - The risk disclosures provided by DoubleVerify were said to be materially false and misleading, as they downplayed already materialized adverse facts [3]. - As a result of these issues, the positive statements made by the defendants regarding the company's business and prospects were claimed to be materially false or misleading [3]. Next Steps for Shareholders - Shareholders who purchased shares of DoubleVerify during the specified class period are encouraged to register for the class action by July 21, 2025, to potentially become lead plaintiffs [4]. - Once registered, shareholders will receive updates through a portfolio monitoring software regarding the status of the case [4].

Core Viewpoint - Kuehn Law, PLLC is investigating potential breaches of fiduciary duties by officers and directors of DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. related to misrepresentation and failure to disclose critical information affecting shareholders [1]. Group 1: Allegations of Misrepresentation - Insiders at DoubleVerify allegedly caused the company to misrepresent customer behavior, specifically that customers were shifting ad spending from open exchanges to closed platforms, where DoubleVerify's technological capabilities were limited [2]. - The company’s ability to monetize its Activation Services was reportedly constrained due to the high costs and time required for technology development for closed platforms, which were not adequately disclosed to investors [2]. - It is claimed that monetization of Activation Services in connection with certain closed platforms would take several years, contrary to what was communicated to shareholders [2]. Group 2: Competitive Position and Billing Issues - DoubleVerify's competitors are said to be better positioned to integrate AI into their offerings on closed platforms, raising concerns about the company's competitive edge [2]. - The company allegedly overbilled customers for ad impressions served to declared bots operating from known data center server farms, which raises ethical and operational concerns [2]. Group 3: Misleading Risk Disclosures - The risk disclosures provided by DoubleVerify were characterized as materially false and misleading, as they downplayed adverse facts that had already materialized [2]. - Positive statements regarding the company's business, operations, and prospects were claimed to be materially false or misleading, lacking a reasonable basis [2].

Core Viewpoint - The Gross Law Firm has issued a notice to shareholders of DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. regarding a class action lawsuit alleging that the company made materially false and misleading statements during the class period from November 10, 2023, to February 27, 2025 [1] Allegations - Allegations include that DoubleVerify's customers shifted ad spending from open exchanges to closed platforms, limiting the company's technological capabilities [1] - The complaint states that the monetization of DoubleVerify's Activation Services was hindered due to the high costs and time required for technology development for closed platforms [1] - It is claimed that monetization of these services would take several years, impacting the company's profitability [1] - Competitors were reportedly better positioned to integrate AI into their offerings on closed platforms, further impairing DoubleVerify's competitive edge [1] - The company allegedly overbilled customers for ad impressions served to bots operating from known data centers [1] - Risk disclosures from DoubleVerify were characterized as materially false and misleading, presenting adverse facts as mere possibilities [1] - As a result of these issues, positive statements made by the defendants regarding the company's business and prospects were deemed materially false or misleading [1] Next Steps for Shareholders - Shareholders are encouraged to register for the class action by July 21, 2025, to participate in the case without any cost or obligation [2] - Registered shareholders will receive updates through a portfolio monitoring software throughout the lifecycle of the case [2]

Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. alleging securities fraud that affected investors between November 10, 2023, and February 27, 2025 [1][2]. Case Details - The lawsuit claims that DoubleVerify's customers are shifting ad spending from open exchanges to closed platforms, where the company's technological capabilities are limited and face competition from native tools of platforms like Meta and Amazon [2]. - It is alleged that DoubleVerify's ability to monetize its Activation Services is constrained due to the high costs and time required for technology development for closed platforms [2]. - The complaint states that monetization of DoubleVerify's Activation Services on certain closed platforms could take several years [2]. - Competitors are reportedly better positioned to integrate AI into their offerings on closed platforms, negatively impacting DoubleVerify's competitive stance and profitability [2]. - The lawsuit also alleges that DoubleVerify overbilled customers for ad impressions served to bots operating from known data centers [2]. - It is claimed that DoubleVerify's risk disclosures were misleading, presenting adverse facts as mere possibilities [2]. - As a result of these issues, the positive statements made by the defendants regarding the company's business and prospects are said to be materially false or misleading [2]. Next Steps - Investors who suffered losses in DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. during the specified timeframe have until July 21, 2025, to request appointment as lead plaintiff, although participation in any recovery does not require this [3]. - Class members may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket costs or fees [3]. Why Levi & Korsinsky - Levi & Korsinsky has a history of securing significant compensation for shareholders and has extensive experience in complex securities litigation [4]. - The firm has been recognized in ISS Securities Class Action Services' Top 50 Report for seven consecutive years as a leading securities litigation firm in the U.S. [4].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. for allegedly misleading investors regarding the company's performance and competitive position during the class period from November 10, 2023, to February 27, 2025 [1][3]. Group 1: Allegations Against DoubleVerify - The lawsuit claims that DoubleVerify misrepresented the shift of its customers' ad spending from open exchanges to closed platforms, where the company's capabilities were limited and faced competition from platforms like Meta and Amazon [3]. - It is alleged that developing technology for closed platforms was more costly and time-consuming than communicated to investors [3]. - The monetization of Activation Services on closed platforms was expected to take several years, contrary to the company's claims [3]. - Competitors were reportedly better positioned to implement AI solutions on closed platforms, affecting DoubleVerify's competitiveness and profitability [3]. - The company allegedly overbilled customers for ad impressions served to known bots, impacting its financial integrity [3]. - Risk disclosures from DoubleVerify were claimed to be misleading, presenting ongoing issues as hypothetical risks [3]. Group 2: Impact on Stock Price - On February 28, 2024, DoubleVerify issued lower-than-expected Q1 2024 revenue growth guidance, leading to a stock drop of over 21% [4]. - On May 7, 2024, the company cut its full-year 2024 revenue outlook due to reduced ad spending, resulting in a nearly 39% decline in stock price [5]. - On February 27, 2025, disappointing Q4 2024 earnings were reported, revealing the negative impact of the shift to closed platforms, causing shares to fall more than 36% [5].

Core Viewpoint - The Gross Law Firm has issued a notice to shareholders of DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. regarding a class action lawsuit due to alleged misleading statements and failure to disclose critical information during the class period from November 10, 2023, to February 27, 2025 [1][3]. Allegations - The complaint alleges that DoubleVerify's customers shifted ad spending from open exchanges to closed platforms, where the company's technological capabilities were limited, impacting its competitive position against platforms like Meta and Amazon [3]. - It is claimed that DoubleVerify's ability to monetize its Activation Services was constrained due to the high costs and time required for technology development for closed platforms, which were not adequately disclosed to investors [3]. - The lawsuit states that monetization of DoubleVerify's Activation Services on certain closed platforms would take several years, contrary to what was communicated to shareholders [3]. - Competitors of DoubleVerify were reportedly better positioned to integrate AI into their offerings on closed platforms, negatively affecting DoubleVerify's competitiveness and profitability [3]. - The company allegedly overbilled customers for ad impressions served to bots operating from known data center server farms, raising concerns about its billing practices [3]. - The risk disclosures provided by DoubleVerify were claimed to be materially false and misleading, as they downplayed already materialized adverse facts [3]. - As a result of these issues, the positive statements made by the defendants regarding the company's business and prospects were deemed materially false or misleading [3]. Next Steps for Shareholders - Shareholders who purchased shares of DoubleVerify during the specified class period are encouraged to register for the class action by July 21, 2025, to participate in potential recovery efforts [4]. - Once registered, shareholders will receive updates through a portfolio monitoring software regarding the status of the case [4].