Core Viewpoint - The Gross Law Firm is notifying shareholders of Klarna Group plc regarding a class action lawsuit related to misleading statements made during the company's initial public offering (IPO) on September 10, 2025 [1][3]. Group 1: Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that Klarna's defendants issued materially false and misleading statements and failed to disclose significant risks associated with loss reserves that were expected to increase shortly after the IPO [4]. - Specifically, it is claimed that the defendants understated the risk profile of individuals taking Klarna's buy now, pay later loans, which they either knew or should have known [4]. Group 2: Class Action Details - The class period for the lawsuit includes individuals who purchased Klarna securities during the IPO registration statement and related prospectus [3]. - Shareholders are encouraged to register for the class action by February 20, 2026, to potentially be appointed as lead plaintiffs, although this is not a requirement for recovery [5]. Group 3: Firm's Commitment - The Gross Law Firm emphasizes its mission to protect investors' rights and ensure companies adhere to responsible business practices [6]. - The firm aims to recover losses for investors who suffered due to false or misleading statements that led to artificial inflation of Klarna's stock [6].

Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. Litigation Partner Brandon Walker Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In Klarna (KLAR) To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options. If you purchased or acquired Klarna’s common stock IPO traceable to September 10, 2025 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Bragar Eagel & Squire partner Brandon Walker or Melissa Forunato directly at (212) 355-4648. Click here to participate in the action. NEW YORK, Jan. 21, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- What’s Happening: Bragar E ...

Core Viewpoint - Klarna Group plc is facing a class action lawsuit related to its September 10, 2025 IPO, alleging violations of the Securities Act of 1933 due to misleading offering documents and understated risks associated with its loss reserves [1][3]. Group 1: Class Action Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit, titled Nayak v. Klarna Group plc, allows purchasers of Klarna securities from the IPO to seek appointment as lead plaintiff by February 20, 2026 [1][5]. - Klarna's IPO involved the issuance of approximately 34 million shares at an offering price of $40.00 per share [2]. - The lawsuit claims that Klarna's offering documents were materially false and omitted critical information regarding the risk of increased loss reserves shortly after the IPO [3]. Group 2: Financial Performance and Stock Impact - Following the IPO, Klarna reported a net loss of $95 million on November 18, 2025, and increased provisions for loan losses to $235 million, exceeding analyst estimates of $215.8 million [4]. - The provisions for loan losses represented 0.72% of gross merchandise volume, up from 0.44% the previous year [4]. - By the time the class action lawsuit commenced, Klarna's stock price had dropped to as low as $31.31 per share, significantly below the IPO price of $40 [4]. Group 3: Legal Representation and Process - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is representing investors in the Klarna class action lawsuit, noted for its significant recoveries in securities fraud cases [6]. - The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 allows any investor who acquired Klarna securities to seek lead plaintiff status, which enables them to direct the lawsuit on behalf of the class [5].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Klarna Group plc on behalf of investors who acquired Klarna securities during the specified class period, alleging that the company failed to disclose material financial risks in its IPO documents [1][3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that Klarna underestimated the likelihood of a significant increase in loss reserves shortly after its IPO, which is linked to the high-risk profiles of its customers [3]. - Investors who purchased Klarna securities during the class period have until February 20, 2026, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff representatives [2]. Group 2: Financial Impact - Following a report on November 18, 2025, that Klarna had set aside greater provisions for credit losses than the market anticipated, the company's share price declined by 21% from the IPO price of $40 to $31.31 [4].

Swipe to Finance will launch in the coming months, enabling customers to pay over time even after checkout, directly in the OnePay app NEW YORK, Jan. 20, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Sometimes the timing is wrong, not the purchase. Today, OnePay, the consumer fintech trusted by millions of Americans to make money better, and Klarna, the global digital bank and flexible payments provider, announced Swipe to Finance, a new OnePay Later option that gives OnePay Cash customers the ability to pay over time after checko ...

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Klarna Group plc on behalf of investors who acquired Klarna securities during the specified class period, alleging omissions in the IPO Registration Statement regarding potential increases in loss reserves [1][3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that Klarna's IPO Registration Statement failed to disclose critical information about the potential increase in loss reserves following the IPO [3]. - The complaint indicates that Klarna was aware or should have been aware of the risks associated with its customer profiles, which could lead to increased credit loss provisions [3]. - Reports emerged on November 18, 2025, indicating that Klarna was raising its provisions for credit losses due to defaults [3]. Group 2: Financial Performance - As of the lawsuit filing, Klarna shares were trading at $31.31, significantly lower than the IPO price of $40 [4]. Group 3: Investor Information - Investors who purchased Klarna securities during the class period have until February 20, 2026, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff representatives [2].

Core Viewpoint - The equity market serves as a significant mechanism for wealth creation or destruction over the long term, with Pacifica Yield focusing on undervalued high-growth companies, high-dividend stocks, REITs, and green energy firms [1] Group 1 - Pacifica Yield aims to pursue long-term wealth creation [1] - The strategy includes a focus on undervalued yet high-growth companies [1] - High-dividend tickers, REITs, and green energy firms are also key areas of interest [1]

Core Viewpoint - Hagens Berman is notifying investors about a securities class action against Klarna Group plc, focusing on alleged misstatements in the company's September 2025 IPO documents, with a lead plaintiff deadline set for February 20, 2026 [1][2]. Summary by Relevant Sections Class Action Details - The class action involves investors who purchased shares during Klarna's September 2025 IPO and experienced significant losses [2]. - The core allegation is that Klarna's IPO documents understated credit loss reserves and risks associated with "Fair Financing" [2]. Allegations Against Klarna - The lawsuit claims that Klarna's IPO Registration Statement and Prospectus contained misleading statements regarding credit modeling and risk management [3]. - Specifically, it is alleged that the offering documents materially understated the credit risks of lending to financially unsophisticated clients and those in financial hardship, which led to an underestimation of potential increases in loss provisions [4]. Financial Performance and Impact - On November 18, 2025, Klarna reported a 102% year-over-year increase in its provision for credit losses and a significant rise in operating losses, resulting in the stock price dropping nearly 22% below its IPO price [5]. - The investigation is focused on whether the IPO documents adequately disclosed the company's credit risks, especially given the doubling of credit loss provisions shortly after the IPO [6]. Legal Process and Contact Information - The deadline for appointing a lead plaintiff in the class action is February 20, 2026, with the lead plaintiff representing other class members in the litigation [7]. - Investors can contact Hagens Berman to report losses or seek more information about the case through their secure portal or email [8].

Core Viewpoint - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP is investigating potential claims against Klarna Group plc due to allegations of violations of federal securities laws related to misleading statements and inadequate disclosures regarding loss reserves following its IPO [2][5]. Group 1: Legal Investigation and Claims - The law firm is encouraging investors who suffered losses in Klarna to contact them to discuss their legal options, particularly in light of a federal securities class action with a deadline for lead plaintiff applications on February 20, 2026 [2][5]. - The complaint alleges that Klarna and its executives materially understated the risk of increased loss reserves shortly after the IPO, which they either knew or should have known, leading to misleading public statements [5][6]. Group 2: Financial Performance and Market Reaction - Klarna reported a net loss of $95 million in its first earnings report since going public, while setting aside $235 million for loan loss provisions, exceeding analyst estimates of $215.8 million [6]. - The provisions for loan losses represented 0.72% of gross merchandise volume, an increase from 0.44% a year ago, which contributed to a 9.3% decline in Klarna's stock price on November 18, 2025 [6].

Core Viewpoint - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP is investigating potential claims against Klarna Group plc due to allegations of violations of federal securities laws related to misleading statements and inadequate disclosures regarding loss reserves following its IPO [2][5]. Group 1: Legal Investigation and Claims - The firm is encouraging investors who suffered losses in Klarna to contact them to discuss their legal options, particularly in light of a federal securities class action with a deadline for lead plaintiff applications on February 20, 2026 [2][5]. - The complaint alleges that Klarna and its executives materially understated the risk of increased loss reserves shortly after the IPO, which they either knew or should have known [5][6]. - The lawsuit claims that when the true details about Klarna's financial situation became public, investors suffered damages due to the misleading nature of the company's public statements [5][6]. Group 2: Financial Performance and Market Reaction - Klarna reported a net loss of $95 million in its first earnings report since going public, while setting aside $235 million for loan loss provisions, exceeding analyst estimates of $215.8 million [6]. - Provisions for loan losses represented 0.72% of gross merchandise volume, an increase from 0.44% a year ago, indicating a growing concern over credit risk [6]. - Following the earnings report, Klarna's stock experienced a decline of 9.3% on November 18, 2025, reflecting negative market sentiment regarding its financial health [6].