Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Klarna Group plc on behalf of investors who acquired Klarna securities during the specified class period, alleging that the company failed to disclose material financial risks in its IPO documents [1][3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that Klarna underestimated the likelihood of rising loss reserves shortly after its IPO, which is linked to the high-risk profiles of its customers [3]. - Investors who purchased Klarna securities during the class period have until February 20, 2026, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff representatives [2]. Group 2: Financial Impact - Following a report on November 18, 2025, that Klarna had set aside greater provisions for credit losses than anticipated, the company's share price declined by 21% from the IPO price of $40 to $31.31 [4].

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In Klarna To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their OptionsIf you purchased or acquired securities in Klarna pursuant and/or traceable to the registration statement and related prospectus (collectively, the "Registration Statement") issued in connection with Klarna's September 2025 initial public offering (the "IPO")and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wil ...

SAN DIEGO, Jan. 5, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Robbins LLP reminds stockholders that a class action was filed on behalf of all investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Klarna Group plc (NASDAQ: KLAR) securities pursuant and/or traceable to the registration statement and related prospectus issued in connection with Klarna's September 10, 2025, initial public offering ("IPO"). Klarna purports to be a "technology-driven payments company, with operations spanning multiple countries." For more information, submit ...

Core Viewpoint - A securities class action has been filed against Klarna Group plc, alleging that the company's offering documents for its September 2025 IPO misrepresented the risks associated with its lending practices [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Action and Allegations - The lawsuit, Nayak v. Klarna Group plc, seeks to represent investors who acquired Klarna securities during its IPO, where over 34 million shares were issued at $40 each [1][2]. - Hagens Berman, a law firm, is investigating claims that Klarna's offering documents violated federal securities laws, urging affected investors to come forward [2]. - The complaint asserts that Klarna's statements regarding its credit modeling and risk management were misleading, particularly in relation to lending to financially unsophisticated clients [3]. Group 2: Financial Performance and Market Reaction - Klarna reported a 102% year-over-year increase in its provision for credit losses in Q3 2025, alongside a significant rise in operating losses, which led to a sharp decline in its share price to $31.63, approximately 20% below the IPO price [4]. - The spike in credit loss provisions raises questions about the transparency of Klarna's risk disclosures at the time of the IPO [5].

Core Viewpoint - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP is investigating potential claims against Klarna Group plc due to allegations of violations of federal securities laws related to misleading statements and inadequate disclosures regarding loss reserves following its IPO [2][4]. Group 1: Legal Investigation and Claims - The firm is encouraging investors who suffered losses in Klarna to contact them to discuss their legal options, particularly in light of a federal securities class action with a deadline for lead plaintiff applications set for February 20, 2026 [1][2]. - The complaint alleges that Klarna and its executives materially understated the risk of increased loss reserves shortly after the IPO, which they either knew or should have known, leading to misleading public statements [4]. Group 2: Financial Performance and Market Reaction - Klarna reported a net loss of $95 million in its third quarter, while setting aside $235 million for loan loss provisions, which exceeded analyst estimates of $215.8 million [5]. - The provisions for loan losses represented 0.72% of gross merchandise volume, an increase from 0.44% the previous year, contributing to a 9.3% decline in Klarna's stock price on November 18, 2025 [5].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased securities of Klarna Group plc about a class action lawsuit related to the company's September 2025 IPO, with a lead plaintiff deadline set for February 20, 2026 [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Klarna securities may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and those wishing to serve as lead plaintiff must act by February 20, 2025 [3]. - Investors can join the class action by visiting the provided link or contacting the firm directly for more information [6]. Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting their own achievements in this area [4]. - The firm has secured significant settlements for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone, and has been consistently ranked among the top firms for securities class action settlements [4]. Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that the Registration Statement issued by Klarna contained false or misleading statements, particularly regarding the risk of increased loss reserves shortly after the IPO [5]. - It is claimed that the defendants either knew or should have known about the risks associated with Klarna's buy now, pay later loans, leading to materially false public statements [5].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding purchasers of Klarna Group plc securities about the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline in a securities class action related to Klarna's September 2025 IPO [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Klarna securities may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by February 20, 2026 [3] - The lawsuit alleges that the Registration Statement contained false or misleading statements regarding Klarna's loss reserves and the associated risks [5] Group 2: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions [4] - The firm has achieved significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company, and has consistently ranked highly in securities class action settlements since 2013 [4] - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, showcasing its capability in recovering funds for clients [4]

LOS ANGELES, Jan. 02, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz reminds investors that class action lawsuits have been filed on behalf of shareholders of the following publicly-traded companies.  Investors have until the deadlines listed below to file a lead plaintiff motion. Investors suffering losses on their investments are encouraged to contact The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz to discuss their legal rights in these class actions at 310-914-5007 or by email to fcruz@frankcruzlaw.com. Inte ...

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Klarna Group plc for allegedly misleading investors regarding the company's financial health and risk disclosures related to its IPO on September 10, 2025 [8]. Allegation Details - The lawsuit claims that Klarna's Registration Statement contained false and misleading statements, particularly regarding the underestimation of loss reserves that would increase shortly after the IPO [8]. - It is alleged that the defendants either knew or should have known about the risk profile of individuals taking Klarna's buy now, pay later loans, which contributed to the misleading nature of their public statements [8]. Financial Impact - Klarna's IPO involved the sale of 34,311,274 shares at a price of $40.00 per share [8]. - Following the announcement of disappointing Q3 2025 financial results on November 18, 2025, which included a significant increase in credit loss provisions, Klarna's share price fell by $3.25, or approximately 9.3%, from $34.88 to $31.63 [8]. Next Steps - Investors who purchased Klarna shares and suffered losses are encouraged to contact Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. to discuss their legal rights and options [4]. - The deadline for investors to apply to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit is February 20, 2026 [8]. About the Law Firm - Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. is a nationally recognized law firm that represents individual and institutional investors in various types of litigation, including securities and commercial litigation [5].

Core Viewpoint - Klarna Group plc is facing a class action lawsuit from investors who purchased securities during its initial public offering (IPO) on September 10, 2025, due to alleged misleading information in the offering documents [1][4]. Group 1: IPO Details - Klarna conducted its IPO on September 10, 2025, issuing approximately 34 million shares at an offering price of $40.00 per share [3]. - By the time the class action lawsuit commenced, Klarna's stock price had fallen to as low as $31.31 per share, significantly below the IPO price [5]. Group 2: Allegations of Misleading Information - The class action lawsuit claims that the IPO's offering documents were materially false and/or misleading, particularly regarding the risk of increased loss reserves shortly after the IPO [4]. - It is alleged that Klarna understated the risk associated with its "buy now, pay later" loans, which the defendants either knew or should have known [4]. Group 3: Financial Performance and Provisions - On November 18, 2025, Bloomberg News reported that Klarna posted a net loss of $95 million, with provisions for loan losses amounting to $235 million, exceeding analyst estimates of $215.8 million [5]. - The provisions for loan losses represented 0.72% of gross merchandise volume, an increase from 0.44% the previous year [5].