Workflow
icon
Search documents
拉丁美洲和加勒比社会发展问题区域会议主持人第六次会议的报告(英)
拉丁美洲经济委员会· 2025-04-28 06:15
Investment Rating - The report emphasizes the importance of inclusive social development and the need for regional cooperation to address social and economic challenges, indicating a positive outlook for investment in social development initiatives [15][16][19]. Core Insights - The report highlights the significance of the Second World Summit for Social Development in Qatar in November 2025 as a critical moment for reviewing progress and adopting decisions to reduce inequality and enhance social mobility [15]. - It underscores the necessity of strengthening social policy institutions and financing mechanisms to support comprehensive social protection systems [19][28]. - The report advocates for a holistic approach to addressing inequality, emphasizing the need for new, people-centered development strategies [23][26]. Summary by Sections Attendance and Organization of Work - The sixth meeting of the Presiding Officers was held in Bridgetown on 31 October 2024, attended by representatives from various member countries and organizations [5][7][9]. Agenda - The agenda included the adoption of the agenda, reports on progress, review of key documents, and consideration of regional messages for the upcoming summit [17]. Summary of Proceedings - Opening statements highlighted the urgency of addressing social inequality and the importance of regional cooperation for inclusive development [14][15][16]. - Discussions focused on the need for comprehensive strategies to tackle poverty, hunger, and social inclusion, with emphasis on institutional capacity building [18][19][24][25]. Agreements - The Presiding Officers agreed to prioritize inclusive social development, strengthen social policy institutions, and advance efforts to eradicate hunger and poverty [35][36]. - They emphasized the importance of multilateralism and cooperation in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals [35]. Closing Remarks - The Executive Secretary of ECLAC expressed gratitude for the support received and reaffirmed the commitment to enhancing social policymaking and institutional frameworks [33].
加勒比地区公共债务削减的驱动因素:牙买加、圣基茨和尼维斯和苏里南的案例研究(英)
拉丁美洲经济委员会· 2025-02-05 03:20
Investment Rating - The report does not explicitly provide an investment rating for the industry Core Insights - The Caribbean region has faced a persistent public debt issue, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, with total public debt increasing from $19 billion in 2000 to $63 billion in 2022, nearly tripling [16][18] - The average public debt to GDP ratio in the Caribbean rose from 56% in 2000 to 80% in 2020, before decreasing to 69% in 2022, indicating a significant challenge for sustainable development [19][21] - The report highlights successful debt reduction strategies in Jamaica and Saint Kitts and Nevis, contrasting with Suriname, which has seen a continuous increase in debt levels [16][26] Summary by Sections Introduction - The introduction outlines the global increase in public debt, particularly in developing countries, with Caribbean public debt rising significantly due to the pandemic [18][19] Evolution of Caribbean Public Debt - The chapter discusses the trends in public debt, noting that the Caribbean has one of the highest debt burdens globally, with a notable increase in the debt-to-GDP ratio over the past two decades [29][30] - It highlights the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, which caused a spike in debt levels, with eight Caribbean countries exceeding a debt-to-GDP ratio of 80% during 2020 and 2021 [32][33] National Experiences in Debt Reduction - The report provides case studies of Jamaica, Saint Kitts and Nevis, and Suriname, detailing their respective debt management experiences from 2010 to 2022 [53] - Jamaica's debt-to-GDP ratio decreased from 135% in 2013 to 84% in 2022, showcasing effective fiscal discipline and debt restructuring measures [54][62] - Saint Kitts and Nevis also achieved a significant reduction in debt, while Suriname's debt increased from 28% of GDP in 2010 to 118% in 2022, highlighting the challenges faced by some nations [43][44] Debt Breakdown - The analysis of debt dynamics includes factors such as interest payments, inflation, and GDP growth, which influence the debt-to-GDP ratio in the selected countries [44][45] - The report emphasizes the importance of fiscal rules and substantial debt restructuring in achieving debt reduction [16][26]
发展中国家外部金融脆弱性分析(英)2024
拉丁美洲经济委员会· 2025-01-13 07:00
Investment Rating - The report does not explicitly provide an investment rating for the industry. Core Insights - The dominance of the US dollar as an international payment method has significantly increased, maintaining its strong position as a store of value and reinforcing its role as a global pricing unit. This has substantial financial implications for the US and countries heavily reliant on the dollar, particularly developing nations [15][17][19]. - The analysis highlights the shift in the global financial landscape post the 2008-2009 financial crisis, where capital markets, particularly the bond market, have become the primary source of financing, surpassing the traditional banking system [37][43]. - The report emphasizes the growing external financial vulnerability of developing countries due to their reliance on dollar-denominated debt and the impact of international financial conditions on their economies [19][50]. Summary by Sections Abstract - The abstract outlines the increasing importance of the US dollar in international finance and its implications for developing countries, particularly in the context of changing international financial flows post-global financial crisis [15]. Introduction - The introduction discusses the central role of the US dollar in the international financial system established by the Bretton Woods Agreement and its continued dominance despite challenges [17]. Section I: The Advantage of the Dollar - The dollar remains the most important international reserve currency, with no evidence suggesting a challenge to its dominance in the near to medium term. Data shows that from 2001 to 2020, the dollar's international usage was nearly three times that of the euro and significantly higher than other currencies [21][24]. Section II: International Capital Markets as a Source of Funding - The report notes that from 2000 to 2023, the issuance of debt securities by the non-bank sector increased from $1.5 trillion to $12.9 trillion, highlighting the growing role of capital markets in providing global liquidity [37][39]. Section III: Consequences of Dollar Hegemony - The analysis indicates that the majority of external debt is issued in US dollars, with the share of dollar-denominated debt rising from 53.9% in 2005 to 69.7% in 2022, underscoring the financial vulnerability of developing countries [29][34]. Section IV: Analysis of External Balance Sheets of Developing Countries - The report discusses the increase in foreign currency liabilities without a corresponding rise in foreign currency assets, leading to heightened financial vulnerability for non-financial corporations in developing countries [42]. Section V: Conclusions - The conclusions summarize the findings, emphasizing the need for developing countries to manage their external financial vulnerabilities in light of their reliance on dollar-denominated debt and the implications of global financial conditions [19][50].
气候变化的分布影响和包容性、公正和可持续过渡的政策建议(英)2024
拉丁美洲经济委员会· 2024-12-05 03:55
Investment Rating - The report does not explicitly provide an investment rating for the industry Core Insights - Inequality, both among and within countries, is a significant barrier to transitioning to low-carbon, climate-resilient economies, particularly in regions like Latin America and the Caribbean where structural inequality is prevalent [81] - A mix of policies is required to manage climate change risk, including productive development, trade, fiscal, and social policies, aimed at enhancing socioeconomic benefits while mitigating harmful effects [82] Summary by Sections I. Distributional Impacts of Climate Change - The consequences of climate change exacerbate existing development gaps, including inequality, with developing countries facing higher exposure and vulnerability to climate impacts [20] - High-income countries have per capita emissions 1.5 times higher than upper-middle-income economies and up to 10 times higher than low-income countries, with the top 1% responsible for 15% of emissions [25][26] - Between 1970 and 2021, over 75% of climate disasters and 94% of reported deaths occurred in developing or transition economies [35] II. Distributional Implications of Low-Carbon Transition Policies - The distributional effect of carbon pricing on households depends on the policy instrument and its implementation, with evidence suggesting that carbon pricing is regressive due to higher fossil fuel spending by poorer families [51] - Transition policies will have macro-level distributional impacts, particularly for countries dependent on high-carbon industries, which may face reductions in fiscal revenues and employment levels [61][62] III. Policy Recommendations for an Inclusive, Just, and Sustainable Transition - Establishing social safety nets and investing in basic goods and services is crucial to reduce vulnerability and encourage changes in consumption patterns [68] - A coordinated set of policies is necessary to promote sectors with higher value added and employment growth while ensuring environmental sustainability [69] - The challenge lies in harmonizing policies to close external, social, and environmental gaps, with a focus on structural transformation and social justice [74]
亚太、非洲、拉丁美洲和加勒比地区数字贸易监管审查(英)2024
拉丁美洲经济委员会· 2024-08-05 09:40
Investment Rating - The report does not explicitly provide an investment rating for the industry Core Insights - The report emphasizes the importance of regulatory cooperation to minimize fragmentation in digital trade rules, enhance transparency, and reduce compliance costs, particularly for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) [30][31] - The regional average scores for the Regional Digital Trade Integration Index (RDTII) indicate that the Asia-Pacific region has the highest compliance costs (0.41), followed by Africa (0.34) and Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) (0.25) [30][31] - Regulatory similarity is lowest in the Asia-Pacific region (0.64), suggesting a greater need for cooperation compared to Africa (0.68) and LAC (0.73) [31] Summary by Sections Executive Summary - The report highlights the need for regulatory cooperation to lower compliance costs and enhance digital trade integration across regions [30][31] - It identifies common policy challenges, particularly in intermediary liabilities and telecom regulations, with specific emphasis on investment regulations in the Asia-Pacific region [31][32] Chapter 1: Introduction - The report outlines the RDTII 2.0 framework, which assesses the digital trade policy environment across 102 economies in the Asia-Pacific, Africa, and LAC regions [39][41] - It emphasizes the significance of digital trade for sustainable and inclusive growth in developing countries [39][40] Chapter 2: Digital Trade Policy Environment in Asia-Pacific - The Asia-Pacific region faces challenges related to investment regulations impacting digital trade businesses [31][32] - Recommendations include promoting mutual recognition in areas of existing regional common ground and simplifying investment regulations [34][36] Chapter 3: Digital Trade Policy Environment in Africa - The report suggests harmonizing the digital regulatory landscape at the continental level to enhance regional integration [35] - It emphasizes the need for regulatory interventions to reduce intra-African tariffs on ICT goods and strengthen data privacy frameworks [35] Chapter 4: Digital Trade Policy Environment in Latin America and the Caribbean - Recommendations for LAC include reforming the telecom sector to increase competition and signing the WTO Information Technology Agreement [36][37] - The report highlights the importance of introducing safe harbor regulations to enhance legal certainty for digital platforms [37] Chapter 5: Conclusion - The report synthesizes findings from all three regions and emphasizes the need for tailored recommendations based on regional specificities [37][38]
区域数字贸易一体化指数2.0:指南(英)2024
拉丁美洲经济委员会· 2024-08-05 09:35
il Eca E C L A C Regional Digital Trade Integration Index 2.0: A Guide ESCAP-ECA-ECLAC Initiative on Digital Trade Regulatory Integration The United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP) is the most inclusive intergovernmental platform in the Asia-Pacific region. The Commission promotes cooperation among its 53 member States and nine associate members in pursuit of solutions to sustainable development challenges. ESCAP is one of the five regional commissions of the United N ...
BCA美洲:宏观和前景分歧
拉丁美洲经济委员会· 2024-06-12 02:57
水木调研纪要关注公众号:水木纪要 BCQα Research Emerging Markets Strategy June 10, 2024 Charts That Matter LATAM: Macro And Outlook Divergences Executive Summary Colombia, and Peru - based on their business cycle outlook, maero policy stance, and fundamentals. For the next six to 12 months, we belieye that Brazil will likely exceed economists' growth estimates. Mexico, Chile and Peru will perform broadly in line with those consensus projections, and Colombia will underperform. 服数据加V:shuinu9870 Given their recessions, inflat ...
拉丁美洲和加勒比的数字贸易政策环境(英)
拉丁美洲经济委员会· 2024-05-17 08:20
This report presents significant findings from the Regional Digital Trade Integration Index (RDTII), highlighting similarities and differences among the economies of Latin America and the Caribbean. After introducing the Digital Trade Integration database and the methodology used in RDTII, the report outlines the main index scores by country and pillar. Jamaica, with the lowest score of 0.14, has the most open regulatory environment for digital trade in the region, whereas Cuba, with the highest score of 0. ...