Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential securities claims on behalf of shareholders of GSI Technology Inc. due to allegations of materially misleading business information issued by the company [1]. Group 1: Legal Action and Investor Rights - Shareholders who purchased GSI Technology securities may be entitled to compensation through a contingency fee arrangement, with no out-of-pocket costs [2]. - A class action is being prepared by Rosen Law Firm to seek recovery of investor losses [2]. Group 2: Stock Price Impact - Following a post on Stockwits alleging that GSI Technology's chip did not perform as claimed, the company's stock price fell by $1.08 per share, or 14.2%, closing at $6.52 on February 4, 2026 [3]. Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company and consistently ranking among the top firms for securities class action settlements [4]. - The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased securities of Smart Digital Group Ltd. during the specified class period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit [1][3]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought SDM securities between May 5, 2025, and September 26, 2025, may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by March 16, 2026 [3]. Group 2: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm specializes in securities class actions and has a strong track record, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company [4]. - The firm has been ranked No. 1 for securities class action settlements in 2017 and has consistently ranked in the top 4 since 2013, recovering hundreds of millions of dollars for investors [4]. Group 3: Case Details Against Smart Digital - The lawsuit alleges that Smart Digital was involved in a market manipulation scheme, including misinformation on social media and impersonation of financial professionals [5]. - It is claimed that insiders used offshore accounts to facilitate share dumping during a price inflation campaign, and that Smart Digital's public statements omitted risks related to fraudulent trading [5]. - The lawsuit asserts that these misleading statements led to investor damages when the true details became public [5].

CoreWeave, Inc. (NASDAQ:CRWV) is currently under scrutiny as Rosen Law Firm, a global leader in investor rights, urges investors to seek legal counsel before March 13, 2026. The firm is spearheading a securities class action lawsuit for those who purchased CoreWeave securities between March 28, 2025, and December 15, 2025. This lawsuit claims that CoreWeave's management made misleading statements about its operational capabilities and risks. The lawsuit alleges that CoreWeave overstated its ability to meet ...

Core Viewpoint - Agilon Health, Inc. is facing a securities fraud lawsuit initiated by the Rosen Law Firm, with a lead plaintiff deadline set for March 2, 2026, for investors who purchased securities between February 26, 2025, and August 4, 2025 [1] Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit alleges that Agilon's management made false and misleading statements regarding the company's financial guidance for 2025, which they knew was unattainable due to industry challenges [1] - It is claimed that Agilon overstated the positive financial impact from strategic actions taken to mitigate risks, leading to materially false representations about the company's business and prospects [1] - Investors are encouraged to join the class action without incurring out-of-pocket fees, as the Rosen Law Firm operates on a contingency fee basis [1] Group 2: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - The Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company and being ranked No. 1 for settlements in 2017 [1] - The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone [1] - Founding partner Laurence Rosen has been recognized as a leading figure in the plaintiffs' bar, highlighting the firm's expertise in handling such cases [1]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding former stockholders of Smartsheet Inc. about a class action lawsuit related to the January 2025 sale of Smartsheet to a consortium including Blackstone, Vista Equity Partners, and Platinum Falcon, with a lead plaintiff deadline of February 24, 2026 [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Former Smartsheet stockholders may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by contacting Rosen Law Firm [3][6]. - To serve as lead plaintiff, individuals must file a motion with the Court by February 24, 2026 [3]. Group 2: Legal Representation - Investors are encouraged to select qualified legal counsel with a proven track record in securities class actions, as many firms may lack the necessary experience [4]. - Rosen Law Firm has a history of successful settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company, and has recovered hundreds of millions for investors [4]. Group 3: Allegations Against Smartsheet - The complaint alleges that Smartsheet's solicitation of stockholder approval for the buyout involved a false and misleading Proxy statement, which misrepresented the company's financial performance [5]. - Specific allegations include the intentional mischaracterization of Smartsheet's quarterly earnings and the emphasis on a fabricated financial metric to solicit approval for the buyout [5].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased securities of Klarna Group plc about a class action lawsuit related to Klarna's September 2025 IPO, with a lead plaintiff deadline of February 20, 2026 [1][3]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Klarna securities may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by submitting a form or contacting the law firm [3][6]. - The lawsuit alleges that the Registration Statement contained false or misleading statements regarding Klarna's loss reserves, which were understated, leading to investor damages when the true information became public [5]. Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting their own achievements in this area [4]. - The firm has secured significant settlements for investors, including over $438 million in 2019, and has been recognized as a leader in the field of securities class action litigation [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Plug Power Inc. securities between January 17, 2025, and November 13, 2025, of the April 3, 2026, deadline to become a lead plaintiff in a class action lawsuit [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Plug Power securities during the specified class period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by submitting a form or contacting the law firm [2][5] - The lawsuit alleges that defendants made false or misleading statements regarding the availability of funds from the U.S. Department of Energy and the company's project viability, leading to investor damages when the truth was revealed [4] Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved the largest settlement against a Chinese company and being ranked No. 1 for securities class action settlements in 2017 [3] - The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone [3] - Founding partner Laurence Rosen was recognized as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar by Law360 in 2020, highlighting the firm's expertise and reputation in the field [3]

Core Viewpoint - Varonis Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRNS) is facing a class action lawsuit due to allegations of misleading statements regarding its ability to maintain annual recurring revenue (ARR) projections while transitioning customers to a software-as-a-service (SaaS) model [1] Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit pertains to investors who purchased Varonis common stock between February 4, 2025, and October 28, 2025 [1] - Allegations include that Varonis was unable to maintain ARR projections and failed to effectively convert existing on-premises customers to the SaaS offering, leading to reduced growth potential [1] - The lawsuit claims that the defendants' positive statements about Varonis' business and prospects were materially misleading [1] Group 2: Legal Representation - Rosen Law Firm is encouraging affected investors to join the class action, highlighting its experience and success in securities class actions [1] - Investors can join the class action without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1] - A lead plaintiff must be appointed by March 9, 2026, to represent the interests of the class [1]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased BellRing Brands, Inc. securities during the specified Class Period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - The Class Period for the BellRing Brands, Inc. securities is from November 19, 2024, to August 4, 2025 [1] - Investors may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by March 23, 2026 [2] Group 2: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm specializes in securities class actions and has a strong track record, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company [3] - The firm has been ranked No. 1 for securities class action settlements in 2017 and has consistently ranked in the top 4 since 2013, recovering hundreds of millions for investors [3] - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, and its founding partner was recognized as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar by Law360 in 2020 [3] Group 3: Case Background - BellRing Brands develops and sells "convenient nutrition" products, primarily under the Premier Protein brand [4] - During the Class Period, BellRing's management claimed that sales growth was due to increased consumer demand and other positive factors, while downplaying competitive pressures [4] - The lawsuit alleges that actual sales were driven by inventory stockpiling by key customers, not by genuine consumer demand, leading to damages for investors when the truth was revealed [4]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Plug Power Inc. securities between January 17, 2025, and November 13, 2025, of the April 3, 2026, deadline to become a lead plaintiff in a class action lawsuit [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Plug Power securities during the specified class period may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by visiting the provided link or contacting the firm directly [3][6]. - To serve as a lead plaintiff, individuals must file a motion with the court by April 3, 2026 [3]. Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a proven track record in securities class actions, highlighting their own success in this area [4]. - The firm has achieved significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company, and has consistently ranked highly in terms of settlements since 2013 [4]. Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that Plug Power's defendants made false or misleading statements regarding the availability of funds from the U.S. Department of Energy's Loan and the company's ability to construct necessary hydrogen production facilities [5]. - It is claimed that these misrepresentations led to a pivot towards less commercially viable projects, resulting in damages to investors when the truth was revealed [5].