Disney
Search documents
'No Basis' to Revoke License Over Kimmel, FCC Commissioner Gomez Says
Bloomberg Technology· 2025-09-19 16:29
First Amendment & FCC Authority - The core issue revolves around potential violations of the First Amendment, particularly concerning freedom of speech and freedom of the press [3] - The FCC's authority is limited in regulating content, primarily focusing on protecting children and ensuring programming standards, not retaliating against broadcasters for legal content [6] - Revoking a station's license is an extremely rare and serious action, requiring a very high standard [13] - The FCC does not have the constitutional right nor the ability to take action against broadcasters because of their content [5] Corporate Capitulation & Political Pressure - Concerns exist that the administration is using levers of power to pressure broadcasters and news media to alter their reporting and content [2][3] - Corporate capitulation to this pressure is seen as a fraying of the foundation of democracy [3] - The administration may weaponize transactions and demand changes in how broadcasters report to favor the administration [21] Complaints & Legal Actions - A partisan legal group has been filing numerous complaints against media companies, including those against 60 Minutes and Saturday Night Live [18] - Disney previously paid $50 million to settle a defamation lawsuit related to comments made by one of its hosts [19] Media Regulation & Bias - The approval of the Paramount Skydance deal included installing a "truth arbiter" to field complaints about media bias, which is considered a chilling effect on freedom of the press [20] - Jimmy Kimmel's show is considered satire, not news, and therefore does not meet the standard for news distortion [15][16]
'Trickle-down consequences' of Kimmel's suspension for democracy is 'very damaging': Journalist
MSNBC· 2025-09-19 16:07
Dominic, you have some new reporting about what's going on behind the scenes at Disney over this decision. What are you learning. Well, what we're learning on is that there are ongoing talks at the highest level with Kimmel and Disney executives like Dana Walden, the chair of Disney Entertainment, about trying to find what has been said to me is a pathway to getting Jimmy back on the air. Now, those those talks are happening at the same time as we're learning that there is dissent within some of the upper r ...
President Trump says he had a 'productive' call with Chinese President Xi
CNBC Television· 2025-09-19 16:05
Getting more breaking news on these China trade discussions between the president and she. Let's get back to Aean Jabers. Hey, Aean.>> Carl, that's right. White House press secretary Caroline Levit confirmed to me shortly after 11:00 a. m.this morning that the call between Trump and Xiinping had ended by that time. So, we're looking at a call that began about 8, ended about 11. So, uh that is a lengthy phone call between the two leaders.We do have this uh readout now from the Chinese side. Uh Levit told me ...
Faber Report: Where things stand on Paramount Skydance's potential offer for Warner Bros. Discovery
CNBC Television· 2025-09-19 14:20
Um, all right. Uh, moving guys from, um, new media to old media. No, I'm going to, uh, Paramount and Warner Brothers Discovery. I wanted to give people a bit of an update here and a story obviously we were talking a lot about a week ago when we first learned of the um, plan at Paramount to make an offer to buy all of Warner Brothers Discovery. Earlier this week, I'd indicated that while some had believed, and I had even uh been led to believe as well, perhaps a a said offer would be forthcoming in the near ...
Kimmel suspension shows 'government repression' — not cancel culture
MSNBC· 2025-09-19 14:15
Mergers and Acquisitions - NextStar is seeking an exemption to the 39% cap rule to acquire Tegna in a $6.2 billion deal [3] - Disney is hoping to acquire the media assets of the NFL, potentially bringing the NFL network in-house [3] Business Pressure on Disney - Disney faces pressure from affiliates potentially dropping Jimmy Kimmel's program [1] - There are reports of Disney Plus subscribers canceling subscriptions in response to decisions made by Disney Entertainment's co-chair and CEO [4] - Disney is managing a declining but still lucrative television business while trying to stay out of political issues [13] - Disney's brand, historically bipartisan and beloved, is being dragged into political issues [13] - Disney is bidding against competitors for top talent in Hollywood's creative community, who are likely concerned about the current situation [14] Political and Social Pressures - Disney is facing cross-pressures from MAGA supporters and a majority of Americans who value freedom of speech [10][11][12] - The situation is described as government repression, using state institutions to influence media companies' content decisions [6] - There are concerns that the cancellation of shows is due to political pressure rather than genuine offense [7] - Approximately 41-43% of people may support actions taken by Donald Trump and Brendan Carr [9]
This week on The Vergecast, Nilay pops on the show to discuss what happened to Jimmy Kimmel.
The Verge· 2025-09-19 14:00
They say things like, "We can do this the hard way or the easy way. You can get your $6.2% billion merger or you cannot. " And to get it, you got to get Jimmy Kimmel off the air. >> So Brendan Carr immediately starts making the threats that Brendan Carr as the head of the FCC seems to always make, which is that like I don't like that thing you said, "Wouldn't it be terrible if I took away your broadcast licenses." Jimmy Kimmel show is on ABC, which is owned by Disney. He went on Benny Johnson's YouTube show ...
Disney Ruined by CEO Iger
247Wallst· 2025-09-19 13:15
Walt Disney Co. (NYSE: DIS) was in a tailspin when Bob Iger rejoined as CEO in November 2022. ...
Disney: Patience Is Needed (Upgrade) (DIS)
Seeking Alpha· 2025-09-19 12:01
Back in March of this year, I initiated The Walt Disney Company (NYSE: DIS ) at a sell rating. While I believed that the fundamental setup was more or less neutral, there were extraordinarilyI'm a full-time investor with a strong focus on the tech sector. I graduated with a Bachelor of Commerce Degree with Distinction, major in Finance. I'm also a proud lifetime member of the Beta Gamma Sigma International Business Honor Society. My core values are: Excellence, Integrity, Transparency, & Respect. I always, ...
Disney's Move to Pull 'Kimmel' Sparks First Amendment Debate
Youtube· 2025-09-19 11:01
Core Argument - The article discusses the perceived threats to free speech and the First Amendment under the current administration, highlighting actions taken to control speech by private individuals and companies [2][4][26]. Government Actions - The Trump administration has allegedly used regulatory threats and coercion to influence private companies, compelling them to censor speech that the administration finds objectionable [2][11][24]. - The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) chairman's statements are cited as a direct threat to broadcasters, suggesting that failure to comply with government expectations could lead to regulatory scrutiny [10][11]. Case Examples - The suspension of Jimmy Kimmel's show by Disney is presented as a case where backlash from the administration influenced corporate decisions, raising concerns about the implications for free speech [6][7][10]. - A historical case involving the National Rifle Association (NRA) is referenced, where the Supreme Court ruled that government pressure on private entities to suppress speech violates the First Amendment [18][19]. Legal Implications - There is potential for legal recourse through lawsuits challenging government actions that infringe upon free speech rights, with the possibility of cases reaching the Supreme Court [4][19][26]. - The complexities of such legal actions are acknowledged, particularly regarding the remedies sought and the financial motivations of involved parties [21][26]. Broader Implications - The article raises concerns about the chilling effect on media and public discourse, suggesting that the current environment could deter criticism of the government and undermine the principles of free speech [24][25][26]. - The potential for future administrations to use similar tactics against opposing media is highlighted, emphasizing the risks to free speech across the political spectrum [24][26].