By now you've heard the news: Elon Musk plans to IPO SpaceX in July 2026 -- just a little less than six months from now. This will happen after he already: Conducted an insider sale of SpaceX shares valuing the company at $800 billion (in December). Merged his money-losing social media platform X (formerly Twitter) into his even-more-money-losing artificial intelligence company xAI (in March). And, most recently, merged the result of that merger with SpaceX itself (just last month). The result? L ...

Try Grok Imagine. It keeps getting better.DogeDesigner (@cb_doge):BREAKING: xAI's Grok Imagine continues to rank #1 on Image to Video Leaderboard of Arena .AI beating Google VEO and others. 🥇Download @Grok and try Imagine. https://t.co/o3FdQTAYGe ...

BREAKING: Grok continues to dominate AI leadership boards.• Trivia — Grok 4.1 Fast: #1 on OpenRouter (real-time X-powered knowledge)• Programming — Grok Code Fast 1: 57.6% market share (top agentic coding engine)• Emotional Intelligence — Grok 4.1 Thinking: EQ-Bench3 1586 (world record)• Factual Reliability — Grok 4.1 Search: 2.97% error rate (FactScore leader, xAI)• Human Preference — Grok 4.1 Thinking: ~1475 Elo (top-tier on LMArena)• Science — Grok 4.1 Fast: #1 on OpenRouter (2M-token research standard)• ...

RT Tech Dev Notes (@techdevnotes)xAI Voice API page https://t.co/oAj1g6Zyz2 ...

RT Aaron Burnett (@aaronburnett)Timing is important. But we need to give xAI algo team credit as well. It’s been huge to have niche interest distributed out in front of the right readers without needing to do any sketchy baiting or algo hacking.@VladSaigau and I started purposefully posting deep quantitative analysis into the void back in June 2025. It was a slog. In ~September of last year we saw a noticeable increase in engagement, which then super charged when we started posting our orbital data center a ...

Group 1 - The company X has filed an appeal to the EU General Court against a €120 million fine imposed by the European Commission under the Digital Services Act [1][3] - X claims that the European Commission's decision, made on December 5, 2025, is based on an "incomplete and superficial" investigation and contains "serious procedural errors" [3] - The company argues that the decision systematically infringes on its right to defense and violates fundamental due process requirements, indicating bias from the prosecution [3] Group 2 - The European Commission's fine was the first "non-compliance decision" issued under the Digital Services Act, accusing X of misleading users through its "blue checkmark" certification and non-compliance in transparency and accessibility of its advertising database [3] - In January, the European Commission announced a new formal investigation into X, focusing on potential risks associated with its built-in AI chatbot "Grok" [3]

BREAKING: Grok is becoming the strongest AI🏆 Grok Rankings UpdateFebruary 21, 2026• Trivia — Grok 4.1 Fast: #1 on OpenRouter (real-time X-powered knowledge)• Programming — Grok Code Fast 1: 57.6% market share (top agentic coding engine)• Emotional Intelligence — Grok 4.1 Thinking: EQ-Bench3 1586 (world record)• Factual Reliability — Grok 4.1 Search: 2.97% error rate (FactScore leader, xAI)• Human Preference — Grok 4.1 Thinking: ~1475 Elo (top-tier on LMArena)• Science — Grok 4.1 Fast: #1 on OpenRouter (2M-t ...

NiceJeffrey Weichsel (@jeffreyweichsel):Can anyone beat this pun by @Grok?@SpaceX and @xAI are launching data centers into orbit…because why settle for cloud computing when you can have @X-traterrestrial computing? ...

Core Viewpoint - The founder of Wikipedia, Jimmy Wales, expresses confidence in the resilience of Wikipedia against AI-generated content, citing the high error rates associated with such information [1][2]. Group 1: Concerns about AI-generated Content - Wales emphasizes that Wikipedia relies on human-vetted knowledge, which is crucial for accuracy, and would not allow AI to write articles due to the known issues with AI-generated content [2][3]. - He describes AI-generated encyclopedias, such as Grokipedia, as inferior and merely a "cartoon imitation of an encyclopedia" [3]. Group 2: Issues with AI Hallucinations - The frequency of "hallucinations," or erroneous information, in AI outputs is a significant concern, particularly as the subject matter becomes more obscure [4][6]. - A study by OpenAI in 2025 indicated that hallucination rates could be as high as 79% in advanced models, highlighting the ongoing challenges in AI reliability [5]. Group 3: Value of Human Contribution - Human contributions to Wikipedia benefit from the expertise of subject-matter experts, which helps mitigate inaccuracies and enhances the quality of information [4]. - Wales notes that the rich context provided by human editors is essential for understanding reader needs and preferences [5].

The future is acceleratingtetsuo (@tetsuoai):"a first step towards becoming a Kardashev II-level civilization." - Elon MuskIn the last three weeks:SpaceX acquired xAI, merging the world's largest rocket company with one of the fastest-moving AI labs on the planet. SpaceX valued at $1 trillion.The stated goal of the https://t.co/QCFsUBTNis ...