台湾劳动党、两岸和平发展论坛、台湾中华青年发展联合会等数十个岛内团体日前联合发表声明，严正 抗议高市早苗涉台妄言，表示台湾人民拒绝成为日本军国主义的牺牲品。该声明要求，民进党当局不得 默许、附和或配合日本的军事企图，必须表态拒绝日本军事介入，不得附和任何将台湾推向战争的外 力，必须尽速在一中的法理基础上恢复两岸对话，建立确保台湾人民生命安全的和平框架。 中国国民党主席郑丽文日前在社交平台发文表示，赖清德的回应无疑是火上加油、借机政治操作，对维 系和平毫无助益。在台海与区域局势敏感之际，领导人更应谨慎克制，而不是以意识形态挂帅，利用紧 张局势服务自身党派利益。赖清德的言行不仅无助稳定区域情势，反而可能让台海和区域被推向更危险 局面。 台湾统一联盟党荣誉主席戚嘉林表示，民进党当局不应如此失格，认贼作父地与高市早苗隔海唱和。日 本在殖民台湾期间对台湾民众犯下滔天罪行，民进党如此支持高市早苗立场，愧对台湾这块土地，愧对 台湾先祖。我们坚决反对日本军国主义死灰复燃，绝不允许日本染指台湾的历史重演。 台湾《两岸犇报》网络主编陈崇真表示，赖清德和民进党当局的言行再次暴露"台独"分裂分子亲美媚 日、甘为鹰犬的本质，其言行举止 ...

日本首相高市早苗发表的涉台错误言论引发多方批评。那么，台湾舆论如何看待高市早苗的言论？高市早苗在过去一段时间内是如何与"台独"分裂势力暗中 勾连的？ 0:00 日本在台湾问题上对中国人民负有历史罪责，包括在殖民台湾期间对台湾民众犯下滔天罪行。高市早苗身为日本首相，不仅对历史罪责毫无反思歉疚，还发 表极其错误、极为危险、极具挑衅的涉台言论，严重伤害包括台湾同胞在内全体中国人民的民族感情和整体利益。 对此，赖清德竟然发表一系列媚日言论，民进党方面也亦步亦趋。"台独"政客与日本右翼政客狼狈为奸、沆瀣一气，引发岛内舆论谴责，网民更是纷纷在社 交媒体留言评价其"无底线"，令人"恶心"。 台湾时事评论员谢寒冰在一档节目中讽刺赖清德当局"做人家奴才，做成这样，也是真'了不起'"，他还批评指出，赖清德当局并没有为台湾民众着想，想的 只是自己的政治利益。 日本右翼勾连"台独"分裂势力 沆瀣一气 台湾时事评论员赖岳谦在接受记者采访时表示，高市早苗的讲话，不但违反了中日四个政治文件，违反了一个中国原则，更严重的是她向"台独"分裂势力、 主张"台独"的赖清德还有民进党释放出一个强烈的信号——她在推动鼓励"台独"。她的讲话里面就释放了 ...

回应高市早苗涉台挑衅言论 国台办：日方应立即停止干涉中国内政 中新社北京11月19日电 (张晓曦 黄欣欣)针对日本首相高市早苗公然发表涉台挑衅言论，国务院台办发 言人朱凤莲19日在北京强调，台湾问题是中国内政，不容任何外来干涉。日方应立即停止干涉中国内 政，停止挑衅越线，不要在错误的道路上越走越远。 当日的国台办例行新闻发布会上，有记者提及，中央广播电视总台CGTN全球五个语种网络民调显示， 91.1%受访者表示日本应反思历史罪责，充分尊重中国的主权和领土完整；88.9%受访者谴责日方试图 介入台湾问题；88.3%受访者认为高市早苗将"台湾有事"与集体自卫权挂钩是在为日本军事扩张寻找借 口。 朱凤莲表示，民调结果表明，历史不会被遗忘，更不会被篡改。高市早苗公然抛出涉台挑衅言论，妄图 介入台海局势、否定抗战胜利成果、为军国主义招魂，是对国际正义的践踏，对战后国际秩序的挑衅， 对中日关系的严重破坏，不得不令国际社会强烈质疑和担忧。 朱凤莲说，希望广大台湾同胞充分认清日本相关行径的危险性、危害性，同我们一道坚决粉碎一切"台 独"分裂行径和外来干涉，守护中华民族共同家园，维护中华民族根本利益和自身安全福祉。 中新社记 ...

近期，还有民进党政客参加"对华政策跨国议会联盟"年会并鼓吹所谓"台欧关系新阶段"。对此，陈斌华 指出，该组织不过是一群极端反华分子组成的小集团，对其再度在涉台问题上滋事，我们坚决反对。民 进党当局勾连这样的组织上演一出闹剧，徒增笑柄、自取其辱。 中新社北京11月12日电 (记者 刘大炜 张杨彬)国务院台办新闻发言人陈斌华12日在北京表示，日本在台 湾问题上对中国人民负有历史罪责，在殖民奴役台湾的50年里更是犯下罄竹难书的罪行。 当天举行的国台办例行新闻发布会上，就日本首相高市早苗日前所谓"台湾有事"言论的相关提问，陈斌 华作上述表示。 他强调，80年前，我们打败日本侵略者，光复台湾，终结日本对台湾的侵占掠夺。80年后的今天，谁再 企图挑战中国核心利益，妄想阻挠中国统一大业，中国政府、中国人民、中国军队决不答应、决不容 忍。 陈斌华指出，日本应深刻反省历史，汲取历史教训，恪守一个中国原则和中日四个政治文件精神，信守 在台湾问题上的政治承诺，慎之又慎处理涉台问题。 另就近期许多外国媒体、专家、学者发声批评赖清德当局鲁莽冒进、一再进行谋"独"挑衅，陈斌华表 示，这说明有越来越多的人认清其"和平破坏者""麻烦制造者" ...

Group 1 - The new spokesperson for the Taiwan Affairs Office, Peng Qing'en, emphasized the consistent and clear policy towards Taiwan, stating that "peaceful reunification and 'one country, two systems'" are the fundamental principles for resolving the Taiwan issue and achieving national unity [1] - Peng expressed willingness to create broad space for peaceful reunification and to make maximum efforts for this prospect, while also stating that the option to use force remains on the table if necessary [1] - The spokesperson called for joint efforts from compatriots on both sides of the Taiwan Strait to oppose "Taiwan independence" and foreign interference, aiming to advance the cause of national reunification and share in the rejuvenation of the Chinese nation [1]

Core Viewpoint - The recent poll by the Taiwan Public Opinion Foundation indicates a significant dissatisfaction among the Taiwanese public regarding Lai Ching-te's governance, with 53% expressing disapproval and 27% stating they are "very disapproving" of his administration, reflecting ongoing public discontent [1] Group 1 - Lai Ching-te has maintained a rigid stance on "Taiwan independence," disregarding the interests and welfare of the Taiwanese people and businesses [1] - His administration has intensified efforts to obstruct cross-strait exchanges and cooperation, pushing for economic decoupling between Taiwan and mainland China [1] - The poll results highlight that Lai's actions are unpopular, and if he continues on this path, it may lead to greater public resentment and further harm to Taiwan [1]

Core Viewpoint - The unification of Taiwan with the mainland is an inevitable trend and a common aspiration of the Chinese people, essential for the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation [1][5][8] Group 1: Historical Context - Throughout Chinese history, unification has been the mainstream development, with a shared understanding that "unity brings strength, division leads to chaos" [2] - Taiwan has been part of a unified multi-ethnic nation for most of its history, and the Taiwanese people have a strong patriotic tradition [2][4] - The Chinese Communist Party has consistently prioritized the resolution of the Taiwan issue as a historical mission since 1949 [5] Group 2: Current Relations and Developments - Under the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party, cross-strait relations have developed significantly, with increasing exchanges and cooperation benefiting both sides [3] - The desire for peace, development, and cooperation is the mainstream sentiment among Taiwanese society, supported by policies from the mainland [3] Group 3: Challenges and Opposition - "Taiwan independence" forces are seen as detrimental to the future of Taiwan and are accused of manipulating public sentiment for political gain [4] - These forces are viewed as acting against the interests of the Taiwanese people and the broader Chinese nation, ultimately facing historical judgment [4] Group 4: Future Prospects - The development and strength of the mainland are key factors in determining the future of cross-strait relations, with the potential for increased social and emotional connections [7] - The unification process is framed as not only a national interest but also a guarantee of the welfare of the Taiwanese people [5][6] - The international community is generally supportive of China's stance on unification, viewing it as a matter of upholding international law and order [6] Group 5: Conclusion - The unification of Taiwan is portrayed as a historical inevitability, supported by the collective will of the Chinese people and the ongoing progress of the mainland [8] - The narrative emphasizes that unity is essential for national prosperity and that the path forward is clear and unstoppable [8]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government views the activities of "Taiwan independence" advocates as a significant threat to peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait, emphasizing the need for legal action against such individuals to maintain national unity and sovereignty [2][2][2] Group 1: Government Actions - The Chinese authorities have initiated an investigation against Shen Boyang for establishing a "Taiwan independence" organization and promoting separatist ideologies, which is seen as a direct response to the ongoing threat posed by "Taiwan independence" activities [2][2] - The legal actions taken against "Taiwan independence" advocates are framed as necessary measures to protect the interests and welfare of the Taiwanese people while safeguarding national sovereignty and territorial integrity [2][2] Group 2: Implications for Cross-Strait Relations - The government characterizes "Taiwan independence" advocates as detrimental to cross-strait relations, labeling them as criminals who incite division and conflict, thereby undermining the potential for peaceful cooperation and development between Taiwan and mainland China [2][2] - There is a call for the Taiwanese populace to recognize the dangers of "Taiwan independence" and to work towards enhancing cross-strait exchanges and cooperation, promoting a unified national identity and shared prosperity for the Chinese nation [2][2]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that the unification of Taiwan with the mainland is an inevitable trend and a shared aspiration of the Chinese people, essential for the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation [2][4][10] Group 1: Historical Context - Throughout Chinese history, unification has been the mainstream development, with a strong recognition of the principle that "unity brings strength, while division leads to chaos" [4] - Taiwan has historically been part of a unified multi-ethnic nation, with a significant portion of its population participating in the anti-Japanese war, demonstrating a strong patriotic tradition [4] Group 2: Current Relations - Under the leadership of the Communist Party, cross-strait relations have developed significantly, with increasing exchanges and cooperation benefiting both sides [5] - The desire for peace, development, and cooperation is the mainstream sentiment among the Taiwanese people, supported by policies from the mainland [5] Group 3: Opposition to Separatism - The article describes "Taiwan independence" forces as insignificant and harmful, manipulating public sentiment and jeopardizing Taiwan's future [6] - It argues that these separatist forces are acting against the interests of the Taiwanese people and the broader Chinese nation, ultimately destined for historical judgment [6] Group 4: National Will and Sovereignty - The resolution of the Taiwan issue is framed as a matter for the Chinese people, including the 1.4 billion citizens, to decide, emphasizing national sovereignty and unity [9] - The article asserts that external interference cannot alter the objective reality of one nation and that unification is in the fundamental interest of the Chinese nation [9] Group 5: Future Prospects - The article posits that the development and strength of the mainland will facilitate unification, with the potential for a reasonable "two systems" approach for Taiwan [11] - It concludes that the historical trend towards unification is unstoppable, with the expectation that the complete unification of the motherland will be achieved [11]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that the unification of Taiwan with the mainland is an inevitable trend and a shared aspiration of the Chinese people, essential for the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation [2][6][9] Group 1: Historical Context - The pursuit of unification has been a mainstream historical trend throughout the thousands of years of Chinese history, with a strong recognition of the principle that "unity leads to strength, while division leads to chaos" [3] - Taiwan has historically been part of a unified multi-ethnic nation, and even during periods of foreign occupation, the Taiwanese people demonstrated a strong patriotic spirit [3][4] Group 2: Current Relations - Under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, cross-strait relations have developed significantly, with increasing exchanges and cooperation benefiting both sides [4] - The desire for peace, development, and cooperation is the mainstream sentiment among the Taiwanese people, supported by policies from the mainland that have positively impacted Taiwan [4][6] Group 3: Opposition to Separatism - The article describes "Taiwan independence" forces as detrimental to Taiwan's future, manipulating public sentiment and endangering the well-being of the Taiwanese people [5][6] - It asserts that these separatist forces are acting against the interests of the Chinese nation and will ultimately face historical judgment [5][6] Group 4: National Unity as a Priority - The resolution of the Taiwan issue is framed as a historical mission of the Communist Party, with a commitment to achieving national unity as part of the broader goal of national rejuvenation [6][8] - The article argues that external interference cannot alter the objective reality of one nation and that the unification process is a matter for the Chinese people to decide collectively [6][7] Group 5: Future Prospects - The article posits that the development and strength of the mainland will facilitate the unification process, as the advantages of the mainland will increasingly support the push for unity [8][9] - It concludes that unification is not only a historical necessity but also a moral imperative, with the potential for a reasonable "two systems" approach that respects Taiwan's existing social system [9]