环球网消息，据多家外媒报道，美国商务部近日低调撤回一项拟限制进口中国产无人机的提案。 路透社、香港《南华早报》等媒体9日报道称，美国商务部曾于去年9月以信息通信技术供应链安全为 由，宣布计划出台新规，限制甚至禁止中国产无人机进入美国市场。该提案于去年10月8日提交白宫审 核，但根据白宫网站近日更新的信息，相关提案已于今年1月8日被正式撤回。 美国北卡罗来纳州农民使用的大疆无人机。图源：美媒 值得注意的是，美国白宫与商务部围绕相关提案的磋商持续至去年12月中旬，其间还与中国无人机制造 商大疆的代表会面。大疆方面当时明确告知美官员，对中国制造无人机实施全面限制"没有必要、不合 理，而且会对美国利益相关方造成极其严重的损害"。 路透社称，美国商务部此次撤回限制提案的时机，正值美国总统特朗普计划于今年访华之前。一位知情 政府官员透露，撤回无人机限制的决定似乎与上述外交安排有关。 香港《南华早报》报道称，国际危机研究组织高级研究顾问怀恩表示，该决定凸显特朗普希望维护美中 去年10月认可的贸易框架，并确保今年能顺利访华。 在美国商务部撤回相关限制提案之际，美国联邦通信委员会（FCC）1月7日宣布，基于美国国防部相关 建议 ...

【环球时报报道 记者 何珊】据多家外媒报道，美国商务部近日低调撤回一项拟限制进口中国产无人机 的提案。 路透社、香港《南华早报》等媒体9日报道称，美国商务部曾于去年9月以信息通信技术供应链安全为 由，宣布计划出台新规，限制甚至禁止中国产无人机进入美国市场。该提案于去年10月8日提交白宫审 核，但根据白宫网站近日更新的信息，相关提案已于今年1月8日被正式撤回。 值得注意的是，美国白宫与商务部围绕相关提案的磋商持续至去年12月中旬，其间还与中国无人机制造 商大疆的代表会面。大疆方面当时明确告知美官员，对中国制造无人机实施全面限制"没有必要、不合 理，而且会对美国利益相关方造成极其严重的损害"。 路透社称，美国商务部此次撤回限制提案的时机，正值美国总统特朗普计划于今年访华之前。一位知情 政府官员透露，撤回无人机限制的决定似乎与上述外交安排有关。 在美国商务部撤回相关限制提案之际，美国联邦通信委员会（FCC）1月7日宣布，基于美国国防部相关 建议，将部分外国产无人机及关键零部件豁免于去年12月出台的全面进口禁令之外，豁免有效期至2026 年底。获准进口的产品主要来自法国、瑞士等国企业，相关关键零部件则涵盖英伟达、索尼 ...

上月，美国联邦通信委员会（FCC）以所谓"对国家安全构成不可接受的风险"为由，将所有外国制造的 新型无人机及零部件列入"受管制清单"，相关举动引发中方反对，且在美国内消费者中引发不满。 2025年12月23日，商务部新闻发言人就美针对无人机领域增列"不可信供应商清单"事答记者问。商务部 发言人表示，美方以所谓"国家安全"为由，将所有外国生产的无人机系统及其关键零部件等列入"不可 信供应商清单"，中方对此坚决反对。近年来，美方不顾中美两国企业开展正常商业交易和贸易往来， 不顾中美两国业界的强烈呼声，一再泛化国家安全概念，动用国家力量打击包括中国企业在内的他国企 业，这是典型的市场扭曲和单边霸凌做法。中方敦促美方停止错误做法，立即撤销有关措施。若美方继 续一意孤行，中方将坚决采取必要措施，坚定维护中国企业的正当权益。 美国商务部撤销将中国制造无人机列入所谓"受管制清单"的计划。 据参考消息、环球网等援引外媒报道，美国商务部9日表示，已撤销一项旨在对中国制造的无人机实施 限制、以应对所谓"国家安全担忧"的计划。 据悉，美国商务部去年9月表示计划出台新措施，限制甚至禁止进口中国无人机，以解决信息和通信技 术供应链问题 ...

上月，美国联邦通信委员会（FCC）以所谓"对国家安全构成不可接受的风险"为由，将所有外国 制造的新型无人机及零部件列入"受管制清单"，相关举动引发中方反对，且在美国内消费者中引 发不满。 2025年12月23日，商务部新闻发言人就美针对无人机领域增列"不可信供应商清单"事答记者 问。商务部发言人表示，美方以所谓"国家安全"为由，将所有外国生产的无人机系统及其关键 零部件等列入"不可信供应商清单"，中方对此坚决反对。近年来，美方不顾中美两国企业开展 正常商业交易和贸易往来，不顾中美两国业界的强烈呼声，一再泛化国家安全概念，动用国家 力量打击包括中国企业在内的他国企业，这是典型的市场扭曲和单边霸凌做法。中方敦促美方 停止错误做法，立即撤销有关措施。若美方继续一意孤行，中方将坚决采取必要措施，坚定维 护中国企业的正当权益。 外交部发言人林剑当天在例行记者会上表示，中方坚决反对美方泛化国家安全概念，划设歧视性清 单，无理打压中国企业。美方应纠正错误做法，为中国企业经营提供公平公正、非歧视的环境。 此外，报道称，中国进口无人机在美国商用无人机市场占主导地位，其中超过一半无人机来自大 疆。相关禁令公布后在美国引发广泛反弹 ...

据俄罗斯卫星社网站1月10日报道，美国商务部9日表示，已撤销一项旨在对中国制造的无人机实施限 制、以应对所谓"国家安全担忧"的计划。 发言人说，中方敦促美方停止错误做法，立即撤销有关措施。若美方继续一意孤行，中方将坚决采取必 要措施，坚定维护中国企业的正当权益。 来源：参考消息 （文章来源：上海证券报） 报道称，根据美国政府网站1月9日发布的消息，美国商务部于去年10月8日将该提案提交白宫审查，但 于1月8日撤回提案。 报道称，中国进口无人机在美国商用无人机市场占主导地位，其中超过一半无人机来自大疆。 中国商务部新闻发言人此前表示，美方以所谓"国家安全"为由，将所有外国生产的无人机系统及其关键 零部件等列入"不可信供应商清单"，中方对此坚决反对。近年来，美方不顾中美两国企业开展正常商业 交易和贸易往来，不顾中美两国业界的强烈呼声，一再泛化国家安全概念，动用国家力量打击包括中国 企业在内的他国企业，这是典型的市场扭曲和单边霸凌做法。 报道称，2025年12月，美国联邦通信委员会以国家安全为由，禁止进口外国制造的新型号无人机和零部 件，中国企业大疆创新和道通智能被列入所谓"不可信供应商清单"。 报道称，美国联邦通 ...

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Department of Commerce has revoked a plan to restrict imports of Chinese-made drones, which was initially proposed to address "national security" concerns [1] Group 1: U.S. Regulatory Actions - The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) had previously placed all foreign-made drones and components on a "covered list" due to perceived national security risks [1] - The FCC announced that some "non-Chinese manufactured drones" would be excluded from the restrictions imposed last month [1] - The Department of Commerce submitted the proposal to limit imports of Chinese drones for White House review on October 8, 2022, and withdrew it on January 8, 2023 [1] Group 2: DJI's Position - DJI, a major Chinese drone manufacturer, argued that the comprehensive restrictions on Chinese drones were unnecessary and unreasonable, potentially harming U.S. stakeholders [1] - DJI's products have been validated for safety and reliability by global markets and independent third-party organizations [1] - The company expressed its intention to explore all viable paths to protect its and its global users' legitimate rights [1] Group 3: Market Impact - Chinese-made drones hold a significant position in the U.S. consumer drone sales market [1] - The restrictions led to widespread backlash in the U.S., with many drone operators relying on DJI equipment for small businesses in various sectors [1] - Concerns were raised that the ban could jeopardize livelihoods, as many operators noted the lack of alternatives to Chinese-made drones in the Western market [1]

本文来源：环球网 据路透社等媒体报道，美国商务部周五（9日）表示，已撤销一项为解决"国家安全"问题而限制中国制 造无人机进口的计划。上月，美国联邦通信委员会（FCC）以所谓"对国家安全构成不可接受的风险"为 由，将所有外国制造的新型无人机及零部件列入"受管制清单"，相关举动引发中方反对，且在美国内消 费者中引发不满。 此前，据路透社、美国《国会山报》报道，美国联邦通信委员会（FCC）去年12月22日表示，已将大疆 以及所有外国制造的无人机及其零部件列入一份被认定"对国家安全构成不可接受风险"的企业清单，并 将禁止批准新的无人机型号对美国出口或销售。报道称，被列入所谓FCC的"受管制清单"意味着，今后 外国无人机企业将无法获得FCC的批准，在美国销售新的无人机型号。该认定并不禁止进口、销售或使 用任何此前已获得FCC授权的现有设备型号，也不影响此前已购买的无人机。 对于美方举动，中国无人机制造商大疆创新同月23日在一份声明中表示，对于美国联邦通信委员会 （FCC）将所有非美国制造的无人机列入"Covered List"（受管制清单）的决定表示遗憾。此举不仅限制 了美国消费者与商业用户的选择自由，也损害了开放、公 ...

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Department of Commerce has withdrawn a proposal to restrict the import of Chinese-made drones, which was initially aimed at addressing "national security" concerns. This decision follows backlash from both Chinese manufacturers and U.S. consumers regarding the restrictions imposed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) on foreign-made drones and components [1][3]. Group 1: U.S. Regulatory Actions - The FCC had previously placed all foreign-made drones and their components on a "covered list," citing "unacceptable risks to national security," which led to significant opposition from China and dissatisfaction among U.S. consumers [1][3]. - The FCC announced that it would exclude some "non-Chinese manufactured drones" from the restrictions imposed last month [1]. - The Department of Commerce submitted the proposal to limit imports of Chinese drones for White House review on October 8 of the previous year and officially withdrew it on January 8 [1]. Group 2: Industry Impact and Reactions - DJI, a major Chinese drone manufacturer, expressed regret over the FCC's decision to include all non-U.S. manufactured drones on the "covered list," arguing that it restricts consumer choice and undermines fair market competition [4]. - The company emphasized that its products have been validated for safety and reliability by global markets and independent third-party organizations [4]. - Following the announcement of the restrictions, there was significant backlash in the U.S., with many drone operators relying on DJI equipment for their businesses, leading to concerns about the impact on their livelihoods [5].

Core Viewpoint - The forced divestment of FTDI by the UK government highlights the increasing fragmentation and geopolitical tensions within the global semiconductor industry, particularly affecting Chinese investments in high-end technology sectors [1][5][7]. Group 1: Acquisition Details - In December 2021, Jian Guang Asset acquired 80.2% of FTDI for $414 million, marking a strategic move into the high-end analog chip sector by Chinese capital [1][3]. - FTDI, established in 1992, is a leading company in the USB bridge chip market with nearly 20% market share, crucial for various applications including automotive electronics and IoT [3][4]. - The acquisition was intended to integrate FTDI into the Chinese semiconductor ecosystem, addressing long-standing technological gaps [3][4]. Group 2: Regulatory Actions - The UK government initiated a security review under the National Security and Investment Act, classifying the acquisition as a "trigger event" [4][5]. - On November 5, 2024, the UK government mandated the sale of FTDI due to concerns over potential misuse of technology and threats to critical infrastructure, setting a deadline for divestment by December 2025 [1][4]. - Despite legal challenges from the Chinese entity, the UK High Court upheld the government's decision, removing legal obstacles to the forced sale [4][6]. Group 3: Implications for the Semiconductor Industry - The case reflects a broader trend of Western nations using "national security" as a rationale to restrict foreign investments, potentially leading to increased scrutiny of any Chinese semiconductor investments [5][6]. - The forced divestment of FTDI may undermine global supply chain stability and efficiency, as the semiconductor industry relies on international collaboration [7]. - The situation raises concerns about the potential for further fragmentation of the semiconductor market, which could exacerbate global chip shortages and price volatility [7]. Group 4: Future Considerations - The FTDI incident serves as a catalyst for reevaluating semiconductor governance rules, emphasizing the need for transparent and non-discriminatory international regulations [7]. - China advocates for open cooperation and fair competition in the semiconductor sector, contrasting with the political motivations observed in some Western countries [7].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce urges the U.S. to stop its erroneous practices and immediately revoke the inclusion of foreign-produced drone systems and their key components in the "untrusted suppliers list" [1] Group 1: U.S. Actions - The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has announced the inclusion of all foreign-produced drone systems and their key components in the "untrusted suppliers list" [1] - The U.S. justifies this action under the guise of "national security," which China firmly opposes [1] Group 2: China's Response - China criticizes the U.S. for disregarding normal business transactions and trade relations between Chinese and American companies [1] - The Chinese government highlights the strong voices from the industry against the U.S. actions, labeling them as market distortion and unilateral bullying [1] - China warns that if the U.S. continues its current course, it will take necessary measures to firmly protect the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises [1]