Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the increasing issue of fraud and impersonation involving China UnionPay, emphasizing the organization's commitment to protecting consumers and merchants from illegal activities [1][4][9]. Group 1: Fraudulent Activities - China UnionPay has issued a stern statement regarding recent impersonation cases where individuals or organizations have falsely claimed to represent the company, jeopardizing the financial and personal information security of merchants and consumers [1][4]. - The organization has previously released similar warnings, including a statement in February regarding a fraudulent app named "UnionPay Conference APP," which posed risks of sensitive information theft and financial loss [2][11]. Group 2: Official Communication Channels - China UnionPay stresses that any business or investment solicitations made under its name, such as high-interest financial products or credit card services, are fraudulent [5][6]. - The company has outlined its official communication channels, which include its website, WeChat accounts, and verified social media platforms, urging the public to be cautious of information from unverified sources [7][8]. Group 3: Industry Response - Other financial institutions, including Alipay and Dahua Bank, have also issued statements to combat misinformation and fraud, indicating a broader industry concern regarding the authenticity of information in the digital age [3][14]. - A payment risk control expert has emphasized the need for heightened vigilance among the public and increased efforts from financial institutions to monitor and respond to fraudulent activities effectively [15][17].

在日化护肤市场中，完美芦荟胶凭借多年积累的口碑，成为不少消费者家中的"常备好物"。随着其市场占有率逐步提升，品牌影响力不断扩大，却也让不 法分子嗅到了"商机"。近年来，市场上假冒伪劣的完美芦荟胶层出不穷，不仅扰乱了正常的市场秩序，也给消费者的使用安全带来隐患。 直播间暗藏售假陷阱 法律红线被肆意践踏 早前，上海市浦东警方侦破一起涉案金额达250余万元的销售假冒注册商标的商品罪案，撕开了完美芦荟胶售假黑幕的一角。经调查，犯罪嫌疑人周某、 王某某等人在明知芦荟胶进价极低（一支仅1.5元）极有可能为假冒产品的情况下，仍从2023年7月起，在各大平台开设店铺售卖，非法获利180余万元， 导致多名消费者使用后皮肤过敏。经过侦查，警方锁定位于浙江省的非法生产窝点，开展收网行动，当场查获3万余支假冒品牌 "芦荟胶"。目前，周某等 5名犯罪嫌疑人已被依法刑事拘留。 除了此类制假售假窝点，非官方直播间的售假现象也十分猖獗。不少主播打着 "正品促销""买一送一"的幌子，以远低于官方价格售卖完美芦荟胶，误导 大批不明真相的顾客掉进消费陷阱。 完美公司发现，某视频平台的直播间通过仿造二维码的方式以假乱真，大肆低价销售假冒芦荟胶，欺骗 ...

五粮液在告知书中称，自2024年11月12日发布《致五粮液消费者的告知书（二）》以来，公司与各电商平台持续保持良好沟通，共同对线上与公司及关联公司无 经销关系的商家店铺进行清查，查实并通过电商平台取缔售假店铺261家，下架侵权链接6431条。 针对电商平台销售假酒现象，又有白酒企业出手了。 6月17日，五粮液再次发布致五粮液消费者的告知书称，今年1月—5月，公司累计为电商平台消费者提供1610瓶五粮液产品的免费鉴定服务，经鉴定，其中假冒产 品268瓶，占鉴定总数的16.65%。 业内人士表示，部分电商平台商户通过以次充好、真假掺售等手段欺骗、误导消费者，威胁了消费者健康，破坏了行业经营生态，也损害了品牌企业的形象。 五粮液持续出手"打假" 当前白酒行业仍处于存量竞争时代，电商平台通过低价策略引流，刺激消费者消费，但产品的品质得不到保障，这不仅损害了消费者的合法权益，对白酒行业也会 产生负面影响。 经核查，有部分不法商家在传统电商平台打着"百亿补贴、折扣促销"，直播电商平台打着"限量秒杀、今日闪购"，即时零售平台打着"限时折扣"的旗号销售假冒五 粮液产品。尤其是近期平台上出现的"光瓶第八代五粮液"产品，此类产品 ...

每经记者｜熊嘉楠 每经编辑｜肖芮冬 价格，一直是支撑酒业螺旋式向上的主要动力。当前，行业处于深度调整期，尤其在白酒行业淡季，市场上充斥的假货正严重冲击着脆弱的渠道价格体系， 蚕食消费者信任，对行业的健康发展构成威胁。 6月17日，五粮液在官网发布《致五粮液消费者的告知书（三）》（以下简称告知书），通报了今年前5个月为电商平台消费者提供鉴定服务，发现的假冒产 品率达到16.65%，且针对近期出现在电商平台上的"光瓶第八代五粮液"明确表态：从未向市场销售过"光瓶第八代五粮液"产品。 据了解，这是去年11月以来，五粮液第三次针对线上假货发声。 五粮液在告知书中称，今年1~5月，公司累计为电商平台消费者提供1610瓶五粮液产品的免费鉴定服务。经鉴定，其中假冒产品268瓶，占鉴定总数的 16.65%。 | 2 | 五粮谈 | | 首页 | | 走进五粮液 | 新闻资讯 | 产品中心 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | 新闻 | | 最新新闻 | | | | | | | 新闻资讯 | > | | | | 致五粮液消 | | | | 公告公示 ...

Core Viewpoint - The rise of counterfeit liquor in live-streaming sales has transformed the landscape of alcohol marketing, with brands facing significant challenges in protecting their intellectual property and ensuring product authenticity [1][2][11]. Industry Overview - A staggering 86.96% of alcohol companies have experienced intellectual property infringement, with trademark violations being the most prevalent at 78.26% [1]. - The live-streaming e-commerce sector has become a new growth point for alcohol companies, yet the lack of product traceability and accountability remains a critical issue [1][19]. Counterfeit Liquor Dynamics - Counterfeit liquor is being redefined in live-streaming contexts, often marketed under misleading terms such as "internal supply" or "limited edition" [2][11]. - Specific examples include a product falsely labeled as "Moutai" being sold for 299 yuan for 12 bottles, which was actually a different product from a company with multiple trademark infringement records [6][9]. Consumer Challenges - Consumers face significant difficulties in identifying genuine products, often relying solely on the host's presentation and claims [11][15]. - The complexity of the sales process in live-streaming makes it hard for consumers to determine accountability when counterfeit products are received [15][22]. Regulatory Environment - The regulatory framework is evolving, with the National Market Supervision Administration emphasizing the need for stricter enforcement against counterfeit and infringing products in the online space [17][19]. - Industry organizations are calling for a crackdown on price-cutting, counterfeit sales, and misleading advertising within the alcohol e-commerce sector [19]. Brand Responses - Major alcohol brands are increasing their anti-counterfeiting efforts, with companies like Moutai investing over 400 million yuan annually in anti-counterfeiting measures and establishing dedicated teams for market protection [19][22]. - Brands are also enhancing consumer education and urging purchases through official channels to mitigate risks associated with counterfeit products [19][22].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the controversy surrounding Kelun Pharmaceutical's new product, Ergothioneine capsules, which has been labeled as a "fake drug" by a prominent biologist, leading to a significant drop in the stock prices of both Kelun Pharmaceutical and its subsidiary, Chuaning Biological. Company Summary - Kelun Pharmaceutical's chairman, Liu Gexin, promoted Ergothioneine capsules, resulting in a stock price increase of 16.75% for Kelun and 12.22% for Chuaning Biological over the past month [1][3] - Following the criticism from biologist Rao Yi, both companies experienced a stock price decline of 4.96% and 1.98%, respectively, closing at 37.75 CNY per share and 12.87 CNY per share, with market capitalizations of 603.27 billion CNY and 287.01 billion CNY [5] - Ergothioneine is a natural antioxidant derived from microorganisms, particularly edible mushrooms, and has been associated with various health benefits [5][6] Industry Summary - The product Ergothioneine has not yet been approved as a health supplement in China, and there are no registered products containing Ergothioneine found in the National Medical Products Administration's database [6][9] - The product is currently being sold in China through cross-border e-commerce after being exported to Japan for production, as it has not received domestic approval [6] - Ergothioneine's potential for oral consumption remains uncertain, as it is primarily used as a bioactive ingredient in cosmetic formulations [6]

央视网消息（焦点访谈）：近几年，每到春耕春管期间，这样的场景就会出现在一些地方的酒店、宾馆里：一些农民朋友会被人拉来听课，而讲课的， 则是一些不法分子。这些人以非法获利为目的，通过虚假宣传、欺诈等手段，向农民朋友推销假冒伪劣化肥。化肥的好坏、伪劣直接关系着作物的产量、农 民的收入。那么，这些化肥"忽悠团"是怎么忽悠的，他们的作案手法和特点又是什么？ 高焕玉是江西景德镇乐平市塔前镇大墠村的种粮大户，经营着240多亩土地，2023年2月的一天，正在干活的他突然听到家门口有人喊他的名字，说请他 到县城一家酒店去听化肥的免费讲解课，还提供午餐，没有多想，高焕玉就跟着去了。 王海生是乐平市鸬鹚乡杨湖村的种粮大户，和高焕玉一样，他和村里其他五六个人也被拉着一起去了。就这样，整个乐平市近百个种植户都被拉到了县 城里的一家酒店去听课。根据酒店提供的公共视频画面显示，授课中，一名男子反复宣传他们的化肥，并且鼓动大家购买所谓的"金卡会员证"。课讲完了， 销售团伙开始请大家吃饭，边吃饭边让农民填表下单。 记者看到，这种化肥的外包装袋的商品名为微生物菌剂"氨基酸碳肥"，号称有效活菌数每克大于等于2.0亿，还有钙镁硫铁锌等多种中微量元 ...

Core Viewpoint - The phenomenon of "professional counterfeiters" in China is evolving, with some individuals shifting from legitimate consumer protection roles to exploitative practices for personal gain, leading to significant controversy and debate about their impact on market regulation and consumer rights [1][20][21]. Group 1: Evolution of Professional Counterfeiters - The number of "professional counterfeiters" has significantly increased over the past 30 years, particularly following the enhancement of consumer protection laws in China [1][3]. - Some individuals, such as Z, have been reported to file thousands of complaints, often targeting small businesses and exploiting minor labeling issues to demand high compensation [3][4][7]. - The emergence of "professional claimants" has led to a chain-like trend where individuals sell courses on how to effectively file complaints and claims, indicating a shift towards a more organized and profit-driven approach [2][16][17]. Group 2: Impact on Businesses - Many small businesses, particularly in the beauty and food sectors, have faced repeated complaints from "professional counterfeiters," leading to closures and significant financial losses [4][7][18]. - The complaints often focus on non-substantive issues such as labeling and packaging, diverting regulatory attention from more serious consumer safety concerns [19][21]. - The financial burden on businesses is exacerbated by the high costs associated with resolving these complaints, often resulting in settlements that can reach thousands of yuan [8][14][18]. Group 3: Regulatory and Legal Responses - There is a growing recognition of the need to differentiate between legitimate consumer protection efforts and exploitative practices, with some regions implementing regulations to curb "malicious complaints" [22][23][24]. - Recent legal interpretations emphasize that claims should be based on genuine consumer needs, and excessive or repetitive complaints may be classified as abuse of legal processes [22][24]. - The trend towards leniency in penalties for minor labeling violations reflects an effort to reduce the burden on businesses while still maintaining consumer protection standards [23][27].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the issue of fabricated resumes and exaggerated claims about scientists, particularly focusing on the case of Chinese Academy of Sciences academician Yan Ning, who publicly refuted a false resume that has been circulating since 2021 [1][2][3]. Group 1: Issue of Fabricated Resumes - Yan Ning criticized the circulation of a false resume that exaggerated her achievements and referred to her as "the god of learning," emphasizing the importance of respecting facts even in praise [1][2][3]. - The article highlights that even well-intentioned exaggerations can mislead the public and create a false narrative about scientists [2][3]. Group 2: Impact on Scientists and Society - The phenomenon of exaggerating scientists' accomplishments can lead to confusion and misrepresentation, affecting both the individuals involved and the public's perception of science [5][6]. - The article draws parallels with other cases, such as academician Fu Tingdong and Peking University teacher Wei Dongyi, who also faced similar issues of exaggerated claims about their contributions [5][6]. Group 3: Call for Accountability - There is a need for stricter regulation and accountability from social media platforms and relevant authorities to prevent the spread of false information and protect the integrity of scientific achievements [7][8]. - The article suggests that the issue of exaggeration is not limited to the scientific community but is prevalent across various fields, including education, literature, and government [8][9].

以下文章来源于派代 ，作者江上酒 派代 . 派代2007年创立，帮助超1000万卖家学习和成长，是电商行业最大的学习平台和深度观察者。在短视 频、AI时代，派代将继续助力卖家实现增长，助力中国品牌走向世界。商务合作加v：18027262980 来 源丨派代（ID：paidaiwang） 作者丨江上酒 编辑丨文定 图源丨midjourney 谁都没想到，今年315，王海竟然"哑火"了。 3月14日，就在315晚会召开的前一天晚上，有网友发现，号称"全网打假第一人"的王海被全网禁止关注 和评论了。 王海的微博和抖音 自打1995年王海出道以来，"职业打假人"这个身份一直有着很大的争议。有些人认为他们是"赛博罗宾 汉"，是市场监管体制的一种补充；也有不少人认为，他们只是假借行侠仗义之名，本质上做的其实还 是"敲竹杠"的龌龊勾当。 而作为其中的"打假急先锋"，自直播电商兴起以后，王海也没少在电商圈掀起波澜，几乎每个主流平台 的"带货一哥"都被他盯上过。 在"后电商时代"，我们究竟还需不需要"王海"们？他们的存在对于整个电商生态而言，究竟是一件好事还 是坏事？ 王海被全网禁言 打假踢到"钢板"？ 从网上公开信息来看，王 ...