Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the increasing issue of fraud and impersonation involving China UnionPay, emphasizing the organization's commitment to protecting consumers and merchants from illegal activities [1][4][9]. Group 1: Fraudulent Activities - China UnionPay has issued a stern statement regarding recent impersonation cases where individuals or organizations have falsely claimed to represent the company, jeopardizing the financial and personal information security of merchants and consumers [1][4]. - The organization has previously released similar warnings, including a statement in February regarding a fraudulent app named "UnionPay Conference APP," which posed risks of sensitive information theft and financial loss [2][11]. Group 2: Official Communication Channels - China UnionPay stresses that any business or investment solicitations made under its name, such as high-interest financial products or credit card services, are fraudulent [5][6]. - The company has outlined its official communication channels, which include its website, WeChat accounts, and verified social media platforms, urging the public to be cautious of information from unverified sources [7][8]. Group 3: Industry Response - Other financial institutions, including Alipay and Dahua Bank, have also issued statements to combat misinformation and fraud, indicating a broader industry concern regarding the authenticity of information in the digital age [3][14]. - A payment risk control expert has emphasized the need for heightened vigilance among the public and increased efforts from financial institutions to monitor and respond to fraudulent activities effectively [15][17].

在日化护肤市场中，完美芦荟胶凭借多年积累的口碑，成为不少消费者家中的"常备好物"。随着其市场占有率逐步提升，品牌影响力不断扩大，却也让不 法分子嗅到了"商机"。近年来，市场上假冒伪劣的完美芦荟胶层出不穷，不仅扰乱了正常的市场秩序，也给消费者的使用安全带来隐患。 直播间暗藏售假陷阱 法律红线被肆意践踏 早前，上海市浦东警方侦破一起涉案金额达250余万元的销售假冒注册商标的商品罪案，撕开了完美芦荟胶售假黑幕的一角。经调查，犯罪嫌疑人周某、 王某某等人在明知芦荟胶进价极低（一支仅1.5元）极有可能为假冒产品的情况下，仍从2023年7月起，在各大平台开设店铺售卖，非法获利180余万元， 导致多名消费者使用后皮肤过敏。经过侦查，警方锁定位于浙江省的非法生产窝点，开展收网行动，当场查获3万余支假冒品牌 "芦荟胶"。目前，周某等 5名犯罪嫌疑人已被依法刑事拘留。 除了此类制假售假窝点，非官方直播间的售假现象也十分猖獗。不少主播打着 "正品促销""买一送一"的幌子，以远低于官方价格售卖完美芦荟胶，误导 大批不明真相的顾客掉进消费陷阱。 完美公司发现，某视频平台的直播间通过仿造二维码的方式以假乱真，大肆低价销售假冒芦荟胶，欺骗 ...

五粮液在告知书中称，自2024年11月12日发布《致五粮液消费者的告知书（二）》以来，公司与各电商平台持续保持良好沟通，共同对线上与公司及关联公司无 经销关系的商家店铺进行清查，查实并通过电商平台取缔售假店铺261家，下架侵权链接6431条。 针对电商平台销售假酒现象，又有白酒企业出手了。 6月17日，五粮液再次发布致五粮液消费者的告知书称，今年1月—5月，公司累计为电商平台消费者提供1610瓶五粮液产品的免费鉴定服务，经鉴定，其中假冒产 品268瓶，占鉴定总数的16.65%。 业内人士表示，部分电商平台商户通过以次充好、真假掺售等手段欺骗、误导消费者，威胁了消费者健康，破坏了行业经营生态，也损害了品牌企业的形象。 五粮液持续出手"打假" 当前白酒行业仍处于存量竞争时代，电商平台通过低价策略引流，刺激消费者消费，但产品的品质得不到保障，这不仅损害了消费者的合法权益，对白酒行业也会 产生负面影响。 经核查，有部分不法商家在传统电商平台打着"百亿补贴、折扣促销"，直播电商平台打着"限量秒杀、今日闪购"，即时零售平台打着"限时折扣"的旗号销售假冒五 粮液产品。尤其是近期平台上出现的"光瓶第八代五粮液"产品，此类产品 ...

每经记者｜熊嘉楠 每经编辑｜肖芮冬 价格，一直是支撑酒业螺旋式向上的主要动力。当前，行业处于深度调整期，尤其在白酒行业淡季，市场上充斥的假货正严重冲击着脆弱的渠道价格体系， 蚕食消费者信任，对行业的健康发展构成威胁。 6月17日，五粮液在官网发布《致五粮液消费者的告知书（三）》（以下简称告知书），通报了今年前5个月为电商平台消费者提供鉴定服务，发现的假冒产 品率达到16.65%，且针对近期出现在电商平台上的"光瓶第八代五粮液"明确表态：从未向市场销售过"光瓶第八代五粮液"产品。 据了解，这是去年11月以来，五粮液第三次针对线上假货发声。 五粮液在告知书中称，今年1~5月，公司累计为电商平台消费者提供1610瓶五粮液产品的免费鉴定服务。经鉴定，其中假冒产品268瓶，占鉴定总数的 16.65%。 | 2 | 五粮谈 | | 首页 | | 走进五粮液 | 新闻资讯 | 产品中心 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | 新闻 | | 最新新闻 | | | | | | | 新闻资讯 | > | | | | 致五粮液消 | | | | 公告公示 ...

Core Viewpoint - The rise of counterfeit liquor in live-streaming sales has transformed the landscape of alcohol marketing, with brands facing significant challenges in protecting their intellectual property and ensuring product authenticity [1][2][11]. Industry Overview - A staggering 86.96% of alcohol companies have experienced intellectual property infringement, with trademark violations being the most prevalent at 78.26% [1]. - The live-streaming e-commerce sector has become a new growth point for alcohol companies, yet the lack of product traceability and accountability remains a critical issue [1][19]. Counterfeit Liquor Dynamics - Counterfeit liquor is being redefined in live-streaming contexts, often marketed under misleading terms such as "internal supply" or "limited edition" [2][11]. - Specific examples include a product falsely labeled as "Moutai" being sold for 299 yuan for 12 bottles, which was actually a different product from a company with multiple trademark infringement records [6][9]. Consumer Challenges - Consumers face significant difficulties in identifying genuine products, often relying solely on the host's presentation and claims [11][15]. - The complexity of the sales process in live-streaming makes it hard for consumers to determine accountability when counterfeit products are received [15][22]. Regulatory Environment - The regulatory framework is evolving, with the National Market Supervision Administration emphasizing the need for stricter enforcement against counterfeit and infringing products in the online space [17][19]. - Industry organizations are calling for a crackdown on price-cutting, counterfeit sales, and misleading advertising within the alcohol e-commerce sector [19]. Brand Responses - Major alcohol brands are increasing their anti-counterfeiting efforts, with companies like Moutai investing over 400 million yuan annually in anti-counterfeiting measures and establishing dedicated teams for market protection [19][22]. - Brands are also enhancing consumer education and urging purchases through official channels to mitigate risks associated with counterfeit products [19][22].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the controversy surrounding Kelun Pharmaceutical's new product, Ergothioneine capsules, which has been labeled as a "fake drug" by a prominent biologist, leading to a significant drop in the stock prices of both Kelun Pharmaceutical and its subsidiary, Chuaning Biological. Company Summary - Kelun Pharmaceutical's chairman, Liu Gexin, promoted Ergothioneine capsules, resulting in a stock price increase of 16.75% for Kelun and 12.22% for Chuaning Biological over the past month [1][3] - Following the criticism from biologist Rao Yi, both companies experienced a stock price decline of 4.96% and 1.98%, respectively, closing at 37.75 CNY per share and 12.87 CNY per share, with market capitalizations of 603.27 billion CNY and 287.01 billion CNY [5] - Ergothioneine is a natural antioxidant derived from microorganisms, particularly edible mushrooms, and has been associated with various health benefits [5][6] Industry Summary - The product Ergothioneine has not yet been approved as a health supplement in China, and there are no registered products containing Ergothioneine found in the National Medical Products Administration's database [6][9] - The product is currently being sold in China through cross-border e-commerce after being exported to Japan for production, as it has not received domestic approval [6] - Ergothioneine's potential for oral consumption remains uncertain, as it is primarily used as a bioactive ingredient in cosmetic formulations [6]

央视网消息（焦点访谈）：近几年，每到春耕春管期间，这样的场景就会出现在一些地方的酒店、宾馆里：一些农民朋友会被人拉来听课，而讲课的， 则是一些不法分子。这些人以非法获利为目的，通过虚假宣传、欺诈等手段，向农民朋友推销假冒伪劣化肥。化肥的好坏、伪劣直接关系着作物的产量、农 民的收入。那么，这些化肥"忽悠团"是怎么忽悠的，他们的作案手法和特点又是什么？ 高焕玉是江西景德镇乐平市塔前镇大墠村的种粮大户，经营着240多亩土地，2023年2月的一天，正在干活的他突然听到家门口有人喊他的名字，说请他 到县城一家酒店去听化肥的免费讲解课，还提供午餐，没有多想，高焕玉就跟着去了。 王海生是乐平市鸬鹚乡杨湖村的种粮大户，和高焕玉一样，他和村里其他五六个人也被拉着一起去了。就这样，整个乐平市近百个种植户都被拉到了县 城里的一家酒店去听课。根据酒店提供的公共视频画面显示，授课中，一名男子反复宣传他们的化肥，并且鼓动大家购买所谓的"金卡会员证"。课讲完了， 销售团伙开始请大家吃饭，边吃饭边让农民填表下单。 记者看到，这种化肥的外包装袋的商品名为微生物菌剂"氨基酸碳肥"，号称有效活菌数每克大于等于2.0亿，还有钙镁硫铁锌等多种中微量元 ...

江西武宁"00后"职业打假人郑某因涉嫌敲诈勒索被警方指定居所监视居住；被称为"职业打假第一人"的王海在今年3·15国际消费者权益日前夕，多平台账 号被禁止关注，至今仍未解封……今年以来，关于职业打假人群体的讨论再度引发关注。 自1995年王海购买假"索尼耳机"并成功依据《中华人民共和国消费者权益保护法》获得双倍赔偿以来，"职业打假人"便出现在中国的消费舞台上。30年 来，随着中国法律的不断完善，以及对侵害消费者权益行为惩罚性赔偿金额的提高，"职业打假人"的数量随之大幅增长。 然而，作为市场秩序监管的"吹哨人"，近几年来，"职业打假人"的角色逐渐开始异化，部分"职业打假人"的身份正朝着"职业索赔人"转变，"打假"的范围 从假冒伪劣商品、虚假宣传，延伸至标签瑕疵，或者一些新型电商模式，他们专门购买、消费带有轻微问题的商品，并利用惩罚性赔偿制度向商家高额索 赔，甚至有"打假人"主动"钓鱼"，制造问题商品。 在近一个月的调查中，《IT时报》记者发现，"职业索赔"正逐渐呈现出链条化的趋势，有人专门以"带教打假"为名卖课，课程金额高达数千元，有的"职 业打假人"为达到索赔的目的，日均投诉近10次，执法人员间接成为其"打假 ...

本文来自微信公众号：科学网，作者：李思辉，编辑：方圆，题图来自：视觉中国 截图自颜宁微博 日前，面对一份网络流传的虚假简历，中国科学院院士、知名科学家颜宁公开发帖辟谣："一份不知道 谁（缺乏常识）造出来的真真假假的简历，从前年就开始流传，哪怕也许出于好心，也是不对的，已被 我投诉（删）掉了，不知道为啥现在又被翻出来。" 这份简历中多有对颜宁经历的虚构、成果的拔高，甚至在标题中赫然称其为"学神之神"。 颜宁之所以说炮制、传播这份假简历者"也许出于好心"，是因为这份简历不仅没有贬低、抹黑她的意 思，而且包装精致、冠以盛誉、多有拔高，处处体现的是夸奖和赞美。 问题是，即便是夸奖也需要尊重事实，即便是赞美也得恰如其分，不能为了夸奖和赞美而罔顾事实、胡 编乱造。颜宁之所以郑重地进行辟谣，显然是不愿领受那份胡乱拔高的"好意"。 | 团收起 广旋转 图 查看大图 | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 00 00 | | | | | +Follow | | 25-5-2 10:56 发布于 内蒙古 | | | | | | | 19岁清华本科,23岁普林斯顿博士 ...

以下文章来源于派代 ，作者江上酒 派代 . 派代2007年创立，帮助超1000万卖家学习和成长，是电商行业最大的学习平台和深度观察者。在短视 频、AI时代，派代将继续助力卖家实现增长，助力中国品牌走向世界。商务合作加v：18027262980 来 源丨派代（ID：paidaiwang） 作者丨江上酒 编辑丨文定 图源丨midjourney 谁都没想到，今年315，王海竟然"哑火"了。 3月14日，就在315晚会召开的前一天晚上，有网友发现，号称"全网打假第一人"的王海被全网禁止关注 和评论了。 王海的微博和抖音 自打1995年王海出道以来，"职业打假人"这个身份一直有着很大的争议。有些人认为他们是"赛博罗宾 汉"，是市场监管体制的一种补充；也有不少人认为，他们只是假借行侠仗义之名，本质上做的其实还 是"敲竹杠"的龌龊勾当。 而作为其中的"打假急先锋"，自直播电商兴起以后，王海也没少在电商圈掀起波澜，几乎每个主流平台 的"带货一哥"都被他盯上过。 在"后电商时代"，我们究竟还需不需要"王海"们？他们的存在对于整个电商生态而言，究竟是一件好事还 是坏事？ 王海被全网禁言 打假踢到"钢板"？ 从网上公开信息来看，王 ...