Core Insights - AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) is experiencing a decline in its book value per share (BVPS), reflecting challenges in its underlying portfolios [1][2] Financial Performance - AGNC's tangible net book value per share fell by 7% year-over-year to $7.81 in Q2 2025, primarily due to market volatility and increased debt servicing costs [2][8] - The economic return on tangible common equity for AGNC was negative 1% in Q2 2025, influenced by unrealized losses from mortgage-backed securities (MBS) [3][8] - AGNC's peers, Arbor Realty Trust (ABR) and Orchid Island Capital (ORC), are also facing declines in their book values, with ABR's BVPS at $18.45 and Orchid Island's at $7.21 as of June 30, 2025 [4][5] Market Conditions - The performance of mREITs like AGNC is closely linked to macroeconomic trends, including interest rate fluctuations and the yield curve, which have negatively impacted investment returns [2] - The widening of mortgage spreads relative to U.S. Treasuries has significantly contributed to the decline in AGNC's book value [3] Valuation Metrics - AGNC shares have increased by 11.9% over the past year, outperforming the industry growth of 6.9% [6] - The forward price-to-tangible book (P/TB) ratio for AGNC is 1.24X, higher than the industry average of 0.97X [10] Earnings Estimates - The Zacks Consensus Estimate for AGNC's earnings indicates year-over-year declines of 15.4% for 2025 and 0.9% for 2026, with estimates remaining unchanged over the past week [13] - Current earnings estimates for AGNC are $1.59 for 2025 and $1.57 for 2026, reflecting a significant decrease from the previous year's earnings [15]

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - Hilltop reported net income of approximately $36 million or $0.57 per diluted share for Q2 2025, with a return on average assets of 1% and return on average equity of 6.6% [4] - Net interest income increased by 7% year-over-year, totaling $110.7 million, while net interest margin improved by 17 basis points to 301 basis points [16][19] - The allowance for credit losses declined by $8.2 million to $98 million, with a net reversal of credit losses of $7.3 million during the quarter [15][8] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - PlainsCapital Bank generated $55 million of pretax income on average assets of $12.7 billion, resulting in a return on average assets of 1.35% [5] - PrimeLending reported a pretax gain of $3 million, including a nonrecurring legal settlement of $9.5 million, while origination volumes increased by 2% year-over-year [9][10] - Hilltop Securities generated pretax income of $6 million on net revenues of $110 million, with public finance services seeing a 36% year-over-year increase in net revenues [11][12] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - Average total deposits at PlainsCapital declined during the quarter, reflecting normal seasonal flows, but are expected to grow again in the second half of 2025 [17][7] - Core deposits increased by approximately $275 million year-over-year, indicating strong growth in the market [8] - Mortgage revenues declined by $12 million due to lower valuation marks and origination fees, highlighting ongoing challenges in the mortgage banking sector [19][20] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company aims to manage deposit costs actively while expanding lending activity, focusing on maintaining strong capital levels with a common equity Tier one capital ratio of 20.8% [13][8] - Hilltop is looking to continue share repurchases and evaluate M&A opportunities, particularly in cash-type deals, as the stock trades at a discount to tangible book value [58][59] - The company is adjusting its expected full-year average loan growth rate to 0% to 2% for 2025, reflecting competitive pressures and market conditions [23][46] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed optimism about the bank's performance despite uncertainties in the market regarding interest rates and inflation [24][25] - The outlook for 2025 reflects the current assessment of the economy, with expectations for continued activity in M&A and a focus on returning the mortgage business to profitability [25][58] - Management noted that competition in the mortgage origination market remains challenging, impacting overall margins and production volumes [9][10] Other Important Information - The company returned over $46 million to stockholders through dividends and share repurchases during the quarter [5][13] - Fixed expenses increased by 1.8% year-over-year, driven by higher variable compensation and inflation in personnel and software costs [20][34] Q&A Session Summary Question: Regarding the broker dealer business and efficiency ratio - Management indicated that the elevated efficiency ratio is largely due to the revenue mix, with public finance services up and structured finance flat or down [30][32] Question: On fixed expense guidance - The increase in non-variable expense outlook is driven by inflation in personnel and software costs [34] Question: About net interest margin (NIM) and deposit beta - Management noted that improved analytics and a more rational marketplace contributed to achieving a higher than expected deposit beta [34][35] Question: On loan growth and competition - Management discussed strong pipelines but acknowledged that competition is impacting loan growth, particularly in commercial real estate and C&I portfolios [42][46] Question: On capital management and share repurchases - Management confirmed a strong appetite for share repurchases, with $135 million authorized for 2025, and noted ongoing M&A activity in the market [58][59] Question: About classified loans and credit quality - The improvement in classified loans was primarily driven by paydowns and successful workout activities [61] Question: On deposit costs and outflows - Management expects seasonal outflows to normalize and deposits to rebuild in the latter half of the year [63]

Summary of Seven Hills Realty Trust (SEVN) Conference Call Company Overview - **Company**: Seven Hills Realty Trust (SEVN) - **Market Cap**: Approximately $177 million - **Industry**: Commercial Mortgage REITs - **Management**: Externally managed by RMR Group, which has over $40 billion in assets under management [2][3] Key Points and Arguments RMR Platform and Competitive Advantage - Seven Hills benefits from the extensive resources and knowledge of the RMR platform, which operates across various commercial real estate sectors [4][5] - The firm has access to a broad deal flow due to RMR's management of multiple REITs, enhancing loan sourcing and asset management capabilities [8][10] - The company focuses on middle-market loans, typically ranging from $20 million to $75 million, which provides more pricing power and a sophisticated borrowing base [11][12] Loan Portfolio and Risk Management - Seven Hills maintains a vertically integrated structure, handling all critical functions internally, including origination, underwriting, and asset management [13][14] - The company emphasizes strong sponsorship, focusing on borrowers with proven track records and financial capability to support their projects [15][16] - The firm has only had to foreclose on one asset, indicating effective credit management and risk assessment [34] Interest Rate Environment - The current elevated interest rate environment has created challenges, but the company remains competitive with net interest rate spreads averaging about 1.5% on recent originations [21][22] - The volatility in interest rates has impacted transaction activity, with borrowers hesitant to commit during uncertain periods [27][29] - Seven Hills expects a couple of rate cuts in 2025, which could positively influence origination activity [30] Loan Performance and Future Outlook - The company has a robust pipeline of approximately $1 billion in potential deals, with expectations of $125 million to $150 million in repayments during 2025 [41][42] - The current cash position is about $42 million, deemed adequate for operational needs and upcoming originations [50] - The dividend has been well-covered historically, with a current payout of $0.35 per quarter, and the company anticipates maintaining solid earnings coverage [51][52] Market Dynamics and Opportunities - Banks are expected to maintain lower real estate exposure, creating opportunities for alternative lenders like Seven Hills to capture market share [44][45] - The company is focused on sectors with strong fundamentals, such as multifamily, industrial, select-service hotels, and grocery-anchored retail [59][60] Additional Important Insights - The company has a strong focus on repeat sponsorship, with about one-third of their volume coming from repeat borrowers [58] - The firm is cautious about over-leveraged assets and prefers to work with sponsors who can contribute additional equity when necessary [55][56] This summary encapsulates the key insights from the conference call, highlighting Seven Hills Realty Trust's strategic positioning, market dynamics, and future outlook in the commercial mortgage REIT sector.

Core Viewpoint - AGNC Investment Inc. has experienced an 11.6% decline in share price over the past three months, which is more significant than the industry's decline of 8.5%, reflecting broader challenges in the mortgage market due to rate volatility [1][4]. Price Performance - AGNC's peers, Annaly Capital Management and Arbor Realty Trust, have also seen declines of 5% and 21.4%, respectively, in the same period [1]. - Despite recent price drops, AGNC offers attractive long-term returns with a high dividend yield, which may attract investors [4]. Interest Rate Environment - AGNC's performance is heavily influenced by the interest rate environment, particularly decisions made by the Federal Reserve [5]. - The company's net interest income (NII) fell dramatically from $965 million in 2022 to just $18 million in 2024 due to rising borrowing costs [6]. - A reduction in interest rates by 100 basis points in 2024 positively impacted AGNC's NII, which rose to $159 million in Q1 2025 from a negative $30 million in the same quarter the previous year [7]. Mortgage Rates and Activity - Recent trends show a slight decline in mortgage rates, with the average 30-year fixed-rate mortgage at 6.76% as of May 8, 2025, down from 7.09% a year prior [7]. - Lower mortgage rates are expected to boost origination and refinancing activities, which could enhance AGNC's NII and portfolio value [8][21]. Dividend Yield - AGNC's current dividend yield stands at 16.38%, significantly higher than the industry average of 12.03%, making it an attractive option for income-seeking investors [10]. - The company has a payout ratio of 81% and is engaged in a stock repurchase plan, authorizing up to $1 billion in buybacks through December 31, 2026 [11]. Agency MBS Outlook - AGNC focuses on agency mortgage-backed securities (RMBS), which are backed by U.S. government guarantees, positioning it well in this market segment [12]. - The outlook for agency MBS has improved, although market volatility has increased following recent tariff announcements [13]. - AGNC generated a positive economic return of 2.4% in Q1 2025, supported by its dividend strategy [14]. Valuation - AGNC is currently trading at a forward 12-month price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple of 5.36X, below the industry average of 7.74X, indicating it may be undervalued [22]. - Compared to peers, AGNC's P/E is lower than Annaly Capital Management's 6.66X and Arbor Realty Trust's 8.44X [22]. Investment Consideration - Given the strong fundamentals, high dividend yield, and potential for growth in a declining rate environment, AGNC stock may be a worthwhile addition to investment portfolios [24].

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company reported a positive economic return of 2.6% for the quarter, consisting of a $0.34 dividend and a modest $0.11 decline in book value to $8.81 [9][10] - The estimated book value per common share as of April 30 is between $7.74 and $8.06, reflecting a decline in April due to market volatility [10][26] - The leverage ratio was reduced from 7.1x to the mid-6s, indicating a cautious approach in response to market conditions [24][26] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - The agency RMBS portfolio increased by 9.5% quarter over quarter, with investments focused on higher coupon securities [19] - The company rotated its allocations from lower coupons to higher coupons, capitalizing on attractive valuations [20] - Agency CMBS exposure remained at approximately 15% of the total investment portfolio, with new purchases yielding low double-digit ROEs [21] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - U.S. Treasury yields declined by 20 to 40 basis points across the yield curve during the first quarter, driven by concerns over economic growth [12][13] - The Fed funds futures market is now pricing in deeper cuts, with expectations for the target rate to be reduced three to four times in 2025 [14] - Agency mortgages underperformed treasuries in April due to increased interest rate volatility and market sell-offs [9][23] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company remains focused on higher coupon Agency RMBS, anticipating improved demand from banks and overseas investors as interest rate volatility declines [20][26] - The strategy includes increasing allocations to specified pools with predictable prepayment characteristics, particularly those with low credit score borrowers [20] - The company is cautious on agency mortgages in the near term but maintains a favorable long-term outlook due to expected improvements in investor demand [10][26] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management noted tightening financial conditions and increased uncertainty regarding monetary and fiscal policies, impacting market sentiment [6][10] - The outlook for the second half of the year is cautiously optimistic, with expectations for improved demand for Agency RMBS as the economic environment stabilizes [16][26] - Management emphasized the importance of maintaining liquidity and reducing leverage to navigate current market volatility [24][26] Other Important Information - The company has been disciplined in adding exposure to Agency CMBS, focusing on relative value and risk diversification [21] - The funding market for assets has remained stable, with repo spreads consistent and haircuts unchanged [15] - The company has sold remaining credit investments, focusing entirely on agency assets [65] Q&A Session Summary Question: Can you discuss the decision to take down leverage? - The company reduced leverage by about 0.5 turns due to increased uncertainty regarding monetary, fiscal, and trade policy, which could impact mortgage demand [29][30] Question: What are the current returns on an incremental basis? - Levered ROEs are in the low 20s on higher coupons, indicating attractive spreads [32] Question: Can you comment on changes to the hedge portfolio in April? - The hedge ratio was increased due to uncertainty about near-term monetary policy, maintaining a mix of swaps and treasuries [35][36] Question: How does the smaller portfolio size impact the dividend level? - The company is comfortably covering the dividend despite the portfolio size reduction, with supportive ROEs from reinvestments [38] Question: How do current opportunities in agency compare to previous peaks? - The opportunity in mortgages is attractive, but there is caution regarding potential inflation and its impact on monetary policy adjustments [41][42] Question: What is the outlook for forward rates and the hedge portfolio? - There is uncertainty about future cuts, with a conservative approach to managing the hedge portfolio and leverage [50][52] Question: Are there opportunities in commercial credit? - The company has been hesitant to add credit exposure and has sold remaining credit investments, focusing solely on agency assets [64][65]

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company reported a positive economic return of 2.6% for the quarter, consisting of a $0.34 dividend and a modest $0.11 decline in book value to $8.81 [7][22] - The estimated book value per common share as of April 30 is between $7.74 and $8.06, reflecting a decline in April due to market volatility [8][21] - The leverage ratio was reduced from 7.1x to the mid-6s during the quarter, indicating a cautious approach in response to market conditions [21][23] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - The agency RMBS portfolio increased by 9.5% quarter over quarter, with investments focused on higher coupon securities [17] - The company rotated its allocations from lower coupons to higher coupons, capitalizing on attractive valuations [18] - Agency CMBS exposure remained at approximately 15% of the total investment portfolio, with new purchases yielding low double-digit ROEs [19] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - U.S. Treasury yields declined by 20 to 40 basis points across the yield curve during the first quarter, driven by concerns over economic growth [10][11] - The Fed funds futures market is now pricing in deeper cuts, with expectations for the target rate to be reduced three to four times in 2025 [12] - Agency mortgages underperformed treasuries in April due to increased interest rate volatility and market sell-offs [21][23] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company remains focused on higher coupon Agency RMBS, anticipating improved demand as interest rate volatility declines [18][23] - The strategy includes increasing allocations to specified pools with predictable prepayment characteristics, particularly in a slowing economic environment [18] - The company is cautious about agency mortgages in the near term but maintains a favorable long-term outlook due to expected improvements in investor demand [8][23] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed concerns about tightening financial conditions and the potential impact of U.S. trade policies on economic growth [5][6] - The outlook remains cautious due to elevated interest rate volatility and policy uncertainty, but there is optimism for a steeper yield curve and improved demand in the long term [23] - Management highlighted the importance of maintaining liquidity to navigate potential market stress while capitalizing on investment opportunities as conditions improve [23] Other Important Information - The company noted that prepayment speeds remained low due to limited purchase and refinancing activity, but a decline in mortgage rates is expected to increase prepayment speeds in the coming months [6][7] - The funding market for the company's assets has been stable, with repo spreads remaining attractive [14] Q&A Session Summary Question: Discussion on leverage management during volatile periods - Management indicated that leverage was reduced by about 0.5 turns in April due to increased uncertainty regarding monetary and fiscal policy [26][28] Question: Comments on returns and spreads - Management noted that levered ROEs are in the low 20s on higher coupons, indicating attractive spreads [30] Question: Changes to the hedge portfolio - The hedge ratio was increased in response to uncertainty about near-term monetary policy, maintaining a mix of swaps and treasuries [34] Question: Impact of portfolio size on dividend levels - Management confirmed that the recent dividend reduction is still comfortably covered by current earnings [36] Question: Opportunity set in agency compared to previous peaks - Management expressed that the current opportunity in mortgages is attractive, but there is caution due to potential inflation and its impact on monetary policy [40][41] Question: Relative value of loan balance pools - Management discussed the rotation from low loan balance pools to more credit-constrained pools, driven by economic uncertainty and pricing dynamics [42][44] Question: Forward rate outlook and hedge portfolio development - Management emphasized a conservative approach to hedging and leverage, given the uncertainty in interest rate cuts [50][52] Question: Opportunities in commercial credit - Management stated that they are currently not looking to add credit exposure and have sold remaining credit investments, focusing solely on agency assets [61][62]

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - For Q1 2025, GAAP revenue was $97.7 million, net income was $29.4 million, and earnings per share (EPS) was $0.41, with a year-over-year decline in GAAP earnings primarily due to a nonrecurring loss of $1.9 million on a preferred equity investment [11][12] - The total portfolio at quarter end was $6.8 billion, with estimated unrealized capital appreciation (UCA) at $8.9 billion and a ground lease-to-value (GLTV) ratio of 52% [9][15] - The portfolio currently earns a 3.7% cash yield and a 5.4% annualized yield, with an economic yield of 5.8% that can increase to 7.4% when factoring in unrealized capital appreciation [12][13][14] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company funded a total of $20 million in Q1, consisting of $16 million in ground lease fundings with a 6.7% economic yield and $4 million related to leasehold loans [10] - The ground lease portfolio has grown significantly, with 147 assets and an increase in multifamily ground leases from 8% at IPO to 58% today [10] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company has nonbinding letters of intent (LOIs) totaling approximately $386 million for potential commitments across 11 ground leases and four loans, with six of the ground leases focused on affordable housing [8][9] - The GLTV increased from 49% to 52% quarter over quarter, reflecting the revaluation of the office portfolio [15] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company aims to reach a scale that unlocks the full value of the business for shareholders while expanding its customer base to provide long-term lower-cost capital [5][6] - The management is focused on capital recycling and evaluating opportunities to address the public versus private valuation disconnect [35][21] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management noted that while the market remains volatile, there are signs of stabilization, and they are optimistic about the pipeline of deals [19][62] - The management expressed a cautious optimism regarding the ability to close deals, emphasizing the importance of controlling the entire capital stack [75][76] Other Important Information - The company has approximately $1.3 billion of liquidity and a well-structured capital base with no near-term maturities [17][20] - The company is rated A3 by Moody's, A- by Fitch, and BBB+ by S&P, with ongoing discussions to improve its credit rating [17][80] Q&A Session Summary Question: Can you provide more details on the sponsors and markets related to the LOIs? - The pipeline includes a diverse range of sponsors and markets, with a majority in multifamily, including existing deals and construction projects [25][26] Question: What are the benefits of ground leases versus leasehold loans? - Leasehold loans provide more certainty in volatile markets and can help kickstart transactions that are stalled [27] Question: Can you quantify the closed deals from the LOIs? - The majority of the deals are expected to close this year, with timing varying based on the type of deal [32][33] Question: What is the company's strategy regarding potential joint ventures? - The company is considering joint ventures to unlock value from its existing portfolio while also focusing on new transactions [65][66] Question: How does the company view the current market volatility? - Management acknowledged the ongoing volatility but noted that it has tightened, allowing sponsors to make clearer long-term decisions [44][62] Question: What is the conversation like with S&P regarding credit ratings? - The company is in dialogue with S&P and aims to demonstrate its stability and prudent capital management to achieve a higher rating [80]

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - For Q1 2025, GAAP revenue was $97.7 million, net income was $29.4 million, and earnings per share (EPS) was $0.41, reflecting a decline in GAAP earnings year over year primarily due to a nonrecurring $1.9 million loss on a preferred equity investment [11][12] - Excluding the one-time loss, Q1 EPS increased slightly year over year, driven by higher net earnings on investment fundings and percentage rent [12] - The portfolio currently earns a 3.7% cash yield and a 5.4% annualized yield, with an economic yield of 5.8% [12][13] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - The total portfolio at quarter end was $6.8 billion, with an estimated GLTV of 52% and rent coverage of 3.5 times [9][15] - The company funded a total of $20 million in Q1, consisting of $16 million in ground lease fundings and $4 million related to leasehold loans [10] - The ground lease portfolio has grown 20 times by both book value and estimated unrealized capital appreciation since the IPO, with 85 multifamily ground leases now comprising 58% of the portfolio [10] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company has nonbinding LOIs totaling approximately $386 million for potential commitments across 11 ground leases and four loans, with six of the ground leases focused on affordable housing [7][9] - The portfolio GLTV increased from 49% to 52% quarter over quarter, reflecting the largest office revaluation quarter [14][15] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company aims to reach a scale that unlocks the full value of the business for shareholders while expanding the customer base that can benefit from long-term lower-cost capital [4][5] - The management is focused on capital recycling and evaluating opportunities to address the public versus private valuation disconnect [35][21] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - The management noted that while the market remains volatile, there are signs of stabilization, and they are optimistic about the pipeline of deals [6][19] - The management expressed confidence in the ability to close the majority of the deals in the pipeline within the year, despite the challenges posed by market conditions [31][61] Other Important Information - The company ended the quarter with approximately $1.3 billion of liquidity, supported by potential available capacity in joint ventures [9][17] - The company has a weighted average debt maturity of approximately 19 years and no corporate maturities due until 2027 [17] Q&A Session Summary Question: Can you provide more details on the sponsors and markets related to the nonbinding LOIs? - The pipeline includes a robust mix of multifamily deals, with diverse locations across the West Coast, Southeast, Northeast, and Midwest [25][26] Question: What are the benefits of ground leases versus leasehold loans? - Leasehold loans provide more certainty in volatile markets and can help kickstart transactions that are stalled [27] Question: Can you quantify the closed deals from the LOIs? - The majority of the deals in the pipeline are expected to close this year, with timing varying based on construction versus recap deals [31] Question: What is the company's strategy regarding joint ventures? - The company is exploring opportunities for joint ventures to unlock value from the existing portfolio while focusing on larger scale deals with current partners [65][66] Question: How does the company view the current market volatility? - The management acknowledged ongoing volatility but noted that it has tightened, allowing sponsors to make clearer long-term capital decisions [44][61] Question: What is the outlook for S&P ratings? - The company is in dialogue with S&P and aims to achieve a third single A rating through prudent capital management and continued deal origination [82]

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company reported a GAAP net loss applicable to common stockholders of $9.3 million or $0.29 per diluted share for Q1 2025 [6][16] - Book value per common share decreased to $3.58 from $3.82 at the end of Q4 2024 [7][17] - NAV declined approximately $7.5 million or 3.2% relative to December 31 [7] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - The MSR portfolio had an unpaid principal balance (UPB) of $17 billion and a market value of approximately $227 million, representing about 44% of equity capital [10] - The RMBS portfolio accounted for approximately 39% of equity capital, with a weighted average three-month CPR of 5.8% [10][12] - EAD attributable to common stockholders was $5.4 million or $0.17 per share, benefiting from dollar roll income [16] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - Interest rates ended the quarter at 4.25%, approximately 30 basis points lower quarter over quarter [5] - Prepayment speeds for the MSR portfolio averaged approximately 4.1%, down modestly from the previous quarter [11] - RMBS portfolio's net interest spread was 3.55%, higher than the prior quarter [12] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company plans to deploy capital into Agency RMBS and select MSRs while maintaining strong liquidity and prudent leverage [8] - The management is closely monitoring the macro environment and tariff situation to stress the portfolio for various scenarios [8] - The company aims to improve its expense ratio and capital structure over time by managing operating expenses [8] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed that rates will continue to be highly reactive to global political agendas and domestic economic data [6] - The uncertainty in the market has led the company to position its portfolio more neutrally to withstand daily volatility [6] - Future EAD is expected to trend lower due to the maturation of a significant hedge that previously contributed to EAD [16][53] Other Important Information - The company completed its first full quarter as an integrated, internally managed mortgage REIT [7] - Operating expenses for the quarter were $3.8 million, reflecting a decline due to the elimination of the management fee [17] - The Board declared a dividend of $0.15 per common share for Q1 2025, paid in cash on April 30 [18] Q&A Session Summary Question: What would it take for the company to allocate more to the RMBS portfolio? - Management indicated that all reinvestment income has been directed towards MBS, and significant changes would require selling a portion of the MSR [20][24] Question: Is there any movement in GSE reform affecting capital allocation? - Management stated it is too early to tell, and the market has not fully priced in the potential changes regarding GSE reform [25][29] Question: Can you provide a book value update for Q2? - The company reported a NAV down about 3.7% in April, leading to a 7% book value per share before any dividends [36] Question: How much of the EAD in Q1 was due to the roll-off of expenses associated with internalization? - Approximately $0.02 of EAD in Q1 was attributed to internalization and G&A savings [51] Question: What are the general thoughts on MSR pricing and supply post the Rocket Cooper deal? - Management noted that volumes have been lower and there have not been substantial changes in pricing dynamics in the market [50] Question: Are there opportunities in spec pools within the builder buy-down space? - Management has seen builder buy-downs but has not focused on them for the portfolio, preferring to keep pay-ups modest [44]

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - For Q1 2025, the company reported a GAAP net loss applicable to common stockholders of $9.3 million, or $0.29 per diluted share, compared to a comprehensive loss of $2.6 million, or $0.08 per diluted share [6][15]. - The book value per common share decreased to $3.58 from $3.82 at the end of Q4 2024, reflecting a decline of approximately 6.3% [7][17]. - The NAV was down approximately $7.5 million, or 3.2%, relative to December 31, 2024 [7]. Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - The MSR portfolio had an unpaid principal balance (UPB) of $17 billion and a market value of approximately $227 million, representing about 44% of equity capital [11]. - The RMBS portfolio accounted for approximately 39% of equity capital, with a weighted average three-month CPR of 5.8%, slightly up from 5.7% in the previous quarter [12][13]. - Prepayment speeds for the MSR portfolio averaged approximately 4.1%, down modestly from the previous quarter, while RMBS prepayment speeds remained low [12]. Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - Interest rates ended the quarter at 4.25%, approximately 30 basis points lower quarter over quarter, but volatility increased due to tariff announcements [5][6]. - The company noted that mortgage performance was mixed, with higher coupon mortgages outperforming lower coupon mortgages [10]. Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company plans to deploy capital into Agency RMBS and select MSRs, focusing on strong risk-adjusted return profiles while maintaining liquidity and prudent leverage [9]. - Management emphasized the importance of closely managing operating expenses to improve the expense ratio and capital structure over time [8]. Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed concerns about ongoing macroeconomic uncertainty and the potential for elevated rates until clear macro policy is established [10][11]. - The company is cautious regarding GSE reform, indicating that current market assumptions about government guarantees may not be well-defined [27][29]. Other Important Information - The company declared a dividend of $0.15 per common share for Q1 2025, paid on April 30, 2025 [18]. - Operating expenses for the quarter were reported at $3.8 million, benefiting from the elimination of management fees [17]. Q&A Session Summary Question: What would it take for the company to allocate more to the RMBS portfolio? - Management indicated that all reinvestment income has been directed towards MBS, and significant changes would require selling a portion of the MSR portfolio [23]. Question: Is there any movement in GSE reform affecting market pricing? - Management stated it is too early to tell, noting that while there have been movements at the GSEs, specific plans regarding government guarantees remain undefined [27][29]. Question: Can you provide a book value update for Q2? - The company reported a NAV down about 3.7% in April, leading to an estimated 7% book value per share before any dividends [36]. Question: How much of the EAD in Q1 was due to the roll-off of internalization expenses? - Approximately $0.02 of EAD in Q1 was attributed to savings from internalization and G&A [52]. Question: What are the general thoughts on MSR pricing and supply post-Rocket Cooper deal? - Management noted that volumes have been lower than the previous year, and no substantial changes in pricing dynamics have been observed [51].