也门胡塞官员：美国-胡塞停火协议绝不以任何形式囊括以色列。 ...

也门胡塞官员：阿曼斡旋的美国-胡塞停火协议旨在停止对美国船只的袭击。 ...

克里姆林宫：停火协议将由俄罗斯执行。 ...

Group 1 - President Putin stated that Russia has sufficient strength and means to conclude the special military operation that began in 2022 in a way that meets Russia's requirements [1] - Putin emphasized that there is no need for Russia to use nuclear weapons in the conflict, indicating a desire to avoid escalation [3] - The Russian government announced a ceasefire from May 8 to May 11 during the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Great Patriotic War, expecting Ukraine to reciprocate [3][4] Group 2 - Ukrainian President Zelensky rejected the ceasefire proposal, insisting on a minimum of 30 days for any ceasefire to allow for meaningful diplomatic opportunities [4] - Zelensky expressed skepticism about Russia's commitment to the ceasefire, citing recent military actions and attacks by Russian forces [4] - Former U.S. President Trump indicated uncertainty about the U.S. role in mediating the conflict, suggesting that there may be a point where the U.S. would withdraw from negotiations if no progress is made [5]

对以总理这一说法，马吉德·安萨里当天在社交平台X上发文回应称，卡方"坚决拒绝这一煽动性言论……这些言论 远远不符合最基本的政治和道义责任标准"。 关于近期加沙地带停火谈判进程，卡塔尔首相兼外交大臣穆罕默德·本·阿卜杜勒拉赫曼·阿勒萨尼4月27日表示，近期 在卡塔尔首都多哈举行的谈判"取得一些进展"，但仍存在分歧。"我们需要找到最终问题的答案：如何结束这场战 争。这是整个谈判的关键。"埃及安全部门消息人士4月28日也表示，近期在埃及举行的加沙地带停火谈判接近取 得"重大突破"。 5月2日，哈马斯高级官员发表声明，称愿与以方达成5年停火协议。不过在同日，内塔尼亚胡主持召开安全会议， 初步批准扩大军事行动，加沙局势走向仍存变数。同日，巴勒斯坦外交部发表声明称，在过去4个月中，以色列对 巴勒斯坦约旦河西岸地区北部的袭击持续进行，已造成超4万名巴勒斯坦人流离失所。 【环球网报道】据法新社消息，以色列总理内塔尼亚胡当地时间3日指责卡塔尔作为加沙停火谈判调解方"两边下 注"，并称卡方应停止这一做法。对此，卡塔尔外交部发言人马吉德·安萨里发文予以驳斥。 内塔尼亚胡在社交平台X上发文称，"现在是卡塔尔停止用双重话术两边下注的时 ...

Group 1 - The U.S. Middle East envoy, Wittekov, is set to visit Russia for discussions with President Putin regarding the Ukraine issue, marking the fourth round of talks between them [1] - U.S. Secretary of State Rubio will not attend the upcoming talks in London on April 23, with U.S. Ukraine envoy Keith Kellogg participating instead [4] - President Trump expressed hope for a resolution to the conflict between Russia and Ukraine within the week, indicating that the U.S. may withdraw from mediation if no progress is made [1][4] Group 2 - Ukrainian President Zelensky stated that Ukraine is willing to negotiate in any form after a ceasefire but will never recognize the territories occupied by Russia as belonging to it [6] - Reports indicate that during previous talks in Paris, the U.S. proposed a ceasefire framework that included Ukraine recognizing Russia's annexation of Crimea and not joining NATO, which Zelensky rejected [4][6] - Russian President Putin has suggested a ceasefire along the current contact line, a proposal made to the U.S. envoy earlier in April [5]

多国将推迟在伦敦举行乌克兰问题会谈 智通财经4月23日电，当地时间23日，总台记者获悉，英国、美国、法国、德国和乌克兰的高级外交官 推迟了原定于23日在伦敦举行的乌克兰问题会谈。乌克兰媒体23日引述英国媒体消息称，美方上周提出 的停火协议框架中包括乌克兰承认俄罗斯占领克里米亚、乌克兰不加入北约等内容，但这一提议遭到乌 克兰总统泽连斯基的拒绝。 (央视新闻) ...

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing negotiations between the US and Russia regarding the Ukraine conflict have faced significant challenges, with both sides unable to reach a joint statement due to Ukraine's stance, despite initial positive expectations from the US side [2][4][9]. Group 1: Negotiation Developments - The US and Russia held talks in Riyadh on March 24, which lasted over 12 hours, but failed to produce a joint statement due to disagreements primarily stemming from Ukraine's position [9]. - Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov indicated that discussions included the safety of navigation in the Black Sea and the need for clear guarantees regarding the resumption of grain exports [5][6]. - Lavrov emphasized that Russia would not tolerate any ambiguity in proposals related to the Black Sea [7]. Group 2: Ongoing Conflict - Despite the negotiations, the conflict between Russia and Ukraine continues, with both sides accusing each other of lacking sincerity in reaching a ceasefire [12][16]. - Ukraine's Defense Minister stated that the recent talks with the US were productive, focusing on key issues including energy [11]. - The situation remains tense, with reports of ongoing attacks and military actions from both sides, indicating that the conflict is far from resolution [15][16]. Group 3: Strategic Implications - Analysts suggest that as negotiations progress, the battlefield objectives of both Russia and Ukraine are shifting from purely military goals to strategies that serve their negotiation positions [16]. - The recent military actions by Russia in the Kursk region are seen as efforts to weaken Ukraine's bargaining power at the negotiation table [16].

Group 1: Meeting Overview - The meeting between US President Trump and Ukrainian President Zelensky on February 28 was marked by intense arguments, leading to Zelensky leaving the White House prematurely and the cancellation of a planned joint press conference [2][15][16] - Trump described the meeting as "not smooth," indicating that Zelensky "overestimated his leverage" and that the US seeks peace rather than prolonged conflict [3][4] Group 2: Key Issues Discussed - Trump emphasized the need for Zelensky to express a willingness to achieve peace in order to restart negotiations [4] - The US does not intend to provide specific security guarantees to Ukraine, stating that if Ukraine is attacked again, they cannot expect American protection [8] - Zelensky insisted that security guarantees are a prerequisite for any ceasefire agreement, highlighting the need for continued US support [10][11] Group 3: Mineral Agreement Insights - The US-Ukraine mineral agreement was described as "very fair," with the US seeking to leverage Ukraine's rich mineral resources for its own technological and military needs [6][21] - Analysts suggest that the agreement primarily benefits the US, with Ukraine's core demand for security guarantees being minimally addressed [21][22] - The agreement includes a joint investment fund where Ukraine will contribute 50% of future natural resource revenues, raising concerns about Ukraine's long-term development [22][21] Group 4: European Interest in Ukrainian Resources - European nations, including France and the EU, are also pursuing agreements to access Ukraine's mineral resources, indicating a competitive landscape for these assets [24][25][26] - Analysts note that both the US and Europe are vying for control over Ukraine's mineral wealth, exacerbating transatlantic tensions [26]