NEW YORK, Dec. 4, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- The Gross Law Firm issues the following notice to shareholders of Marex Group plc (NASDAQ: MRX).Shareholders who purchased shares of MRX during the class period listed are encouraged to contact the firm regarding possible lead plaintiff appointment. Appointment as lead plaintiff is not required to partake in any recovery.CONTACT US HERE:https://securitiesclasslaw.com/securities/marex-group-plc-loss-submission-form/?id=179556&from=4CLASS PERIOD: May 16, 2024 to August ...

Core Points - The Gross Law Firm has issued a notice to shareholders of StubHub Holdings, Inc. regarding a class action lawsuit related to the company's initial public offering in September 2025 [1][2] - The lawsuit alleges that the company made materially false and misleading statements about its financial health, particularly regarding free cash flow and vendor payment timing [2] - Shareholders are encouraged to register for the class action by January 23, 2026, to potentially become lead plaintiffs and receive updates on the case [3] Allegations - The complaint claims that the company failed to disclose significant changes in vendor payment timing, which adversely affected free cash flow [2] - It is alleged that the misleading statements regarding free cash flow led to an inflated perception of the company's business and operations [2] Next Steps for Shareholders - Shareholders who purchased shares during the specified class period should register to be included in the case and will receive status updates through a monitoring software [3] - The deadline for seeking lead plaintiff status is January 23, 2026, with no cost or obligation to participate [3] About the Law Firm - The Gross Law Firm is a nationally recognized class action law firm focused on protecting investors' rights against deceit and fraud [4] - The firm aims to ensure companies adhere to responsible business practices and seeks recovery for investors who suffered losses due to misleading statements [4]

Group 1 - Klarna Group plc is under investigation for potential violations of U.S. federal securities laws, focusing on whether the company and its executives made materially false or misleading statements regarding its business operations [1][2] - The law firm Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is leading the investigation and has a strong track record in securities fraud cases, having recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [3] - Klarna provides payment, advertising, and digital retail banking solutions to consumers and merchants, indicating its role in the financial technology sector [2] Group 2 - Robbins Geller is recognized as one of the leading law firms in securities fraud and shareholder litigation, having secured the most monetary relief for investors in four out of the last five years [3] - The firm has a significant history of obtaining large recoveries in securities class action cases, including the largest recovery of $7.2 billion in the Enron case [3] - The investigation may impact Klarna's reputation and investor confidence, depending on the findings related to the alleged misleading statements [1][2]

Core Viewpoint - The Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. is facing a class action lawsuit due to allegations of misleading investors about its financial stability and growth prospects during a challenging macroeconomic environment [1][3]. Group 1: Class Action Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is titled "Singh Family Revocable Trust u/a dtd 02/18/2019 v. Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc." and covers the period from June 4, 2025, to October 29, 2025 [1]. - Investors who purchased Sprouts securities or sold put options during the class period can seek to be appointed as lead plaintiff by January 26, 2026 [1][5]. - The lawsuit alleges that Sprouts and its executives misrepresented the company's resilience against economic pressures and overstated its growth potential [3][4]. Group 2: Financial Performance and Stock Impact - On October 29, 2025, Sprouts reported disappointing third-quarter results, with comparable store growth falling below expectations [4]. - The company also lowered its fourth-quarter guidance and full-year estimates, which it had previously raised just one quarter earlier [4]. - Following the announcement, Sprouts' stock price dropped by more than 26% [4]. Group 3: Legal Representation - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is representing investors in this class action lawsuit and is recognized as a leading firm in securities fraud litigation [6]. - The firm has a strong track record, having recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [6].

Core Viewpoint - DeFi Technologies Inc. is under investigation for potential violations of federal securities laws, which may impact investors who have incurred losses [1] Investigation Details - The investigation is initiated by the Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz on behalf of investors [1] - The investigation follows a press release issued by DeFi on November 6, 2025, indicating possible issues related to compliance with securities regulations [1]

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Skye Bioscience, Inc. for allegedly misleading investors regarding the efficacy of its lead product candidate, nimacimab, during the class period from November 4, 2024, to October 3, 2025 [1] Company Overview - Skye Bioscience, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company based in San Diego, focusing on developing treatments for obesity and metabolic diseases [1] Legal Proceedings - The lawsuit claims that Skye failed to disclose that the efficacy of nimacimab was lower than represented, leading to an overstatement of the drug's clinical and commercial potential [1] - Investors who purchased Skye securities during the class period have until January 16, 2026, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff [1] Stock Performance - Following the announcement of topline data from a Phase 2a study on October 6, 2025, which revealed that the primary endpoint of an 8% weight loss difference compared to placebo was not met, Skye's stock price fell by $2.85 per share, or 60%, closing at $1.90 [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Stride, Inc. class action lawsuit alleges significant misconduct by the company and its executives, including fraudulent practices related to enrollment numbers and compliance failures, leading to substantial financial losses for investors [3][4][5]. Group 1: Allegations Against Stride, Inc. - The lawsuit claims that Stride inflated enrollment figures by retaining "ghost students" and cut staffing costs by overloading teachers beyond statutory limits [3]. - It is alleged that Stride ignored compliance requirements, including background checks and special education services, and suppressed whistleblowers who reported financial directives to delay hiring and deny services [3]. - A complaint from Gallup-McKinley County Schools Board of Education accused Stride of fraud and deceptive practices, which resulted in a nearly 12% drop in Stride's stock price [4]. Group 2: Financial Impact and Stock Performance - Following the announcement of "poor customer experience" leading to higher withdrawal rates and lower conversion rates, Stride estimated a loss of 10,000-15,000 enrollments, causing its stock price to plummet over 54% [5]. - The class action lawsuit allows investors who suffered losses during the specified Class Period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff, representing the interests of the class [6]. Group 3: Legal Representation - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is leading the class action lawsuit, known for its significant recoveries in securities fraud cases, having secured over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [7].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm has announced a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of DeFi Technologies, Inc. securities, alleging that the company made false and misleading statements during the class period from May 12, 2025, to November 14, 2025, which negatively impacted investors [1][1][1] Summary by Relevant Sections Class Action Details - The class action lawsuit has already been filed, and investors who purchased DeFi Technologies securities during the specified period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1][1][1] - Interested parties must move the court to serve as lead plaintiff by January 30, 2026 [1][1][1] Allegations Against DeFi Technologies - The lawsuit claims that DeFi Technologies faced delays in executing its DeFi arbitrage strategy, which was a key revenue driver [1][1][1] - It is alleged that the company understated the competition it faced from other digital asset treasury companies, impacting its ability to execute its strategy [1][1][1] - The lawsuit states that DeFi Technologies was unlikely to meet its previously issued revenue guidance for the fiscal year 2025 due to these issues [1][1][1] - Defendants allegedly downplayed the negative impact of these issues on the company's business and financial results, leading to materially false and misleading public statements [1][1][1] Rosen Law Firm's Background - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company and being ranked No. 1 for the number of settlements in 2017 [1][1][1] - The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors, securing over $438 million in 2019 alone [1][1][1]

Core Viewpoint - Investors with significant losses in StubHub Holdings, Inc. have the opportunity to lead a securities fraud class action lawsuit against the company due to undisclosed financial issues related to its initial public offering in September 2025 [1]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit alleges that StubHub failed to disclose changes in the timing of payments to vendors, which adversely affected its free cash flow [1]. - It is claimed that these undisclosed changes resulted in materially misleading reports regarding the company's free cash flow for the trailing 12 months [1]. - The positive statements made by the company about its business operations and prospects are asserted to be materially misleading and lacking a reasonable basis due to the undisclosed financial issues [1]. Group 2: Participation Information - Investors wishing to participate in the class action must contact the Law Offices of Howard G. Smith before January 23, 2026, which is the lead plaintiff deadline [1]. - Interested parties can reach out via email or telephone to discuss their legal rights and participation in the ongoing lawsuit [1].

Core Viewpoint - StubHub Holdings, Inc. is facing a class action lawsuit related to its September 2025 IPO, alleging violations of the Securities Act of 1933 due to misleading offering documents and significant financial discrepancies [1][3]. Company Overview - StubHub operates a global ticketing marketplace for live events and conducted its IPO on September 17, 2025, issuing approximately 34 million shares at an offering price of $23.50 per share [2][3]. Allegations of the Lawsuit - The lawsuit claims that the IPO's offering documents were materially false or misleading, omitting critical information about changes in payment timing to vendors, which adversely affected free cash flow [3]. - StubHub reported a free cash flow of negative $4.6 million for Q3 2025, marking a 143% decrease year-over-year, and a 69.3% decrease in net cash provided by operating activities [3]. - Following the release of these financial results, StubHub's stock price dropped nearly 21%, and by the time the lawsuit commenced, the stock was trading at $10.31, a nearly 56% decline from the IPO price [4][3]. Legal Process - Investors who purchased StubHub common stock in connection with the IPO can seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the class action lawsuit, representing the interests of all class members [5]. Law Firm Background - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a leading law firm specializing in securities fraud and shareholder litigation, having secured over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [6].