Core Viewpoint - Johnson Fistel, PLLP is investigating potential claims for Grail, Inc. investors regarding losses that may be recoverable under federal securities laws following the company's failure to meet clinical trial endpoints [1][1]. Group 1: Investigation Details - The investigation focuses on Grail's executive officers and their compliance with federal securities laws [1]. - Grail disclosed on February 19, 2026, that its NHS-Galleri trial did not achieve its primary clinical endpoint, leading to a significant decline of approximately 48% in share price during after-hours trading [1][1]. Group 2: Investor Information - Investors who purchased Grail securities and suffered losses are encouraged to join the investigation without any cost or obligation [1]. - Contact information for inquiries includes Jim Baker at (619) 814-4471 or via email [1]. Group 3: Johnson Fistel Overview - Johnson Fistel, PLLP is a nationally recognized law firm specializing in shareholder rights and securities class action lawsuits, with a history of recovering approximately $90.725 million for clients [1][1]. - The firm has been ranked among the Top 10 Plaintiff Law Firms by ISS Securities Class Action Services in 2024, marking its eighth recognition as a top plaintiffs' securities law firm in the U.S. [1].

Core Viewpoint - Richtech Robotics Inc. is facing a class action lawsuit for allegedly misleading investors about its relationship with Microsoft, which has resulted in significant stock price declines [3][4]. Company Overview - Richtech Robotics develops, manufactures, deploys, and sells robotic solutions for automation in the service industry [2]. Legal Allegations - The class action lawsuit claims that Richtech Robotics falsely asserted a collaborative and commercial relationship with Microsoft during the class period [3]. - An article published by Hunterbrook Media on January 29, 2026, stated that Microsoft denied any partnership with Richtech Robotics, leading to a more than 29% drop in Richtech Robotics Class B stock over two trading days [4]. Class Action Process - Investors who purchased Richtech Robotics securities during the class period can seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit, which allows them to represent the interests of all class members [5]. - The lead plaintiff can choose a law firm to litigate the case, and participation as lead plaintiff does not affect an investor's ability to share in any potential recovery [5]. Law Firm Background - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a leading law firm specializing in securities fraud and shareholder rights litigation, having recovered over $916 million for investors in 2025 alone [6].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Ostin Technology Group Co., Ltd. for alleged securities fraud, resulting in significant investor losses exceeding $950 million in market capitalization [1]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit concerns whether Ostin and certain officers and/or directors engaged in unlawful business practices [1]. - Investors have until April 17, 2026, to request to be appointed as Lead Plaintiff if they purchased Ostin securities during the Class Period [1]. Group 2: Allegations and Financial Impact - The complaint alleges that from around December 2024, Ostin and its co-conspirators engaged in a securities fraud scheme that inflated the company's market capitalization from approximately $22 million to over $1 billion [1]. - On June 26, 2025, Ostin investors faced substantial losses as the stock price fell from an intraday high of $9.40 to a closing price of $0.55, resulting in a loss of over 94% of the company's market capitalization in a single day [1].

INVESTOR ALERT: Pomerantz Law Firm Investigates Claims On Behalf of Investors of KDDI Corporation - KDDIY [Accessibility Statement] Skip NavigationNEW YORK, Feb. 19, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Pomerantz LLP is investigating claims on behalf of investors of KDDI Corporation ("KDDI" or the "Company") (OTCMKTS: KDDIY). Such investors are advised to contact Danielle Peyton at [[email protected]] or 646-581-9980, ext. 7980.The investigation concerns whether KDDI and certain of its officers and/or directors have engage ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a class action lawsuit against Paysafe Limited, highlighting allegations of securities fraud related to undisclosed risks and financial misstatements during a specific period [4]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is filed on behalf of investors who purchased Paysafe securities from March 4, 2025, to November 12, 2025, alleging that the company failed to disclose significant risks associated with a high-risk client [4]. - Allegations include understated credit loss reserves, issues with higher risk Merchant Category Codes, and the likelihood that Paysafe would not meet its financial guidance for fiscal year 2025 [4]. - The lawsuit emphasizes that these undisclosed issues could materially impact the company's revenue growth and overall revenue mix [4]. Group 2: Financial Impact - On November 13, 2025, Paysafe reported third-quarter financial results that missed revenue and EPS estimates, attributing a several-million-dollar write-down to a last-minute client shutdown [5]. - The company's credit loss expense for the three months ended September 30, 2025, was reported at $13,220, primarily due to expected chargebacks related to a specific merchant [5]. - Following the financial report, Paysafe's share price dropped by $2.80, approximately 27.6%, from $10.16 to $7.36 [5].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Enphase Energy, Inc. and certain officers for alleged violations of federal securities laws during the Class Period from April 22, 2025, to October 28, 2025, seeking damages for misleading statements regarding the company's business and financial prospects [1]. Company Overview - Enphase Energy, Inc. is a global energy technology company founded in March 2006, focusing on solar generation, storage, and communication solutions [1]. - The company partners with solar and battery financing companies to offer third-party ownership arrangements for solar and battery products to homeowners [1]. Financial Context - Enphase reported "safe harbor revenue," defined as sales made to customers planning to install its products over more than a year [1]. - The Residential Clean Energy Credit allowed homeowners to deduct 30% of costs for clean energy property installed at their homes, which was set to terminate on December 31, 2025, instead of December 31, 2032, as originally enacted [1]. Allegations in the Lawsuit - The lawsuit alleges that Enphase made materially false and misleading statements regarding its ability to manage channel inventory and mitigate the effects of the termination of the 25D Credit, leading to an overstatement of its financial and operational prospects [1]. - Specific allegations include that Enphase overstated its ability to manage inventory and its financial outlook, resulting in misleading public statements throughout the Class Period [1]. Stock Market Reaction - Following the announcement of its third-quarter financial results on October 28, 2025, Enphase's stock price fell by $5.56 per share, or 15.15%, closing at $31.14 per share on October 29, 2025, due to concerns over elevated channel inventory and the impact of the 25D Credit expiration on future revenues [1].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Quantum Biopharma Ltd. for alleged securities fraud and unlawful business practices, with a deadline for investors to join the lawsuit by February 23, 2026 [1]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that Quantum and certain officers and/or directors engaged in securities fraud [1]. - Defendants, including CIBC World Markets and Royal Bank of Canada, are accused of placing thousands of spoofed sell orders to create a false impression of Quantum's stock price decline [1]. - These manipulative orders allegedly deceived investors into selling their shares at artificially low prices, allowing the Defendants to purchase shares at depressed levels for profit [1]. Group 2: Legal Representation - Pomerantz LLP, a prominent law firm specializing in corporate and securities class litigation, is representing the affected investors [1]. - The firm has a long history of fighting for victims of securities fraud and has recovered numerous multimillion-dollar damages awards [1].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against agilon health, inc. for allegedly making false statements and failing to disclose critical information regarding its financial guidance and the impact of strategic actions taken by the company [4]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is on behalf of investors who purchased agilon securities between February 26, 2025, and August 4, 2025, alleging that the company issued misleading guidance for 2025 despite being aware of significant industry challenges [4]. - The lawsuit claims that agilon overstated the positive financial impact from its strategic actions aimed at reducing risk [4]. Group 2: Company Events - On August 4, 2025, agilon announced the resignation of its President and CEO, Steven Sell, which was classified as a termination without cause [5]. - The same day, agilon reported its second-quarter results and acknowledged that industry headwinds were more severe than previously anticipated, leading to the suspension of its full-year 2025 financial guidance [5]. - Following these announcements, agilon's stock price fell by $0.94, or approximately 51.6%, from $1.82 to $0.88 per share [5].

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 19, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- National shareholder rights law firm Hagens Berman is notifying investors in Klarna Group plc (NYSE: KLAR) of the upcoming February 20, 2026, lead plaintiff deadline in a pending securities class action. The firm is actively investigating the lawsuit’s claims of alleged misstatements in Klarna’s September 2025 Initial Public Offering (IPO) documents. CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT YOUR KLARNA LOSSES Investors who purchased Klarna (KLAR) shares pursuant to the company’s ...

China Liberal Education Holdings Limited (CLEUF) Shareholders Who Lost Money Have Opportunity to Lead Securities Fraud Lawsuit [Accessibility Statement] Skip NavigationBENSALEM, Pa., Feb. 19, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- [The Law Offices of Howard G. Smith] announces that investors with substantial losses have opportunity to lead the securities fraud class action lawsuit against China Liberal Education Holdings Limited ("CLEU" or the "Company") (OTC: [CLEUF]).IF YOU ARE AN INVESTOR WHO SUFFERED A LOSS IN CHINA LIBE ...