Core Points - The communication between Xi Jinping and Zheng Liwen indicates a positive direction for the relationship between the Chinese Communist Party and the Kuomintang, as well as cross-strait relations [1] - The Chinese government emphasizes the importance of the "1992 Consensus" as a political foundation for dialogue and cooperation with Taiwan [2][3] Group 1 - Xi Jinping congratulated Zheng Liwen on her election as the Kuomintang chairperson, which is seen as a step towards improving cross-strait relations [1] - The Chinese government plans to enhance communication and cooperation with various Taiwanese parties, including the Kuomintang, to promote national unity and development [1] - The spokesperson for the State Council Taiwan Affairs Office reiterated that the "1992 Consensus" is essential for maintaining peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait [2][3] Group 2 - The Chinese government is open to high-level exchanges with the Kuomintang to strengthen political mutual trust and promote peaceful development of cross-strait relations [2] - The response to the Taiwan Mainland Affairs Council's stance highlights the necessity of acknowledging the "1992 Consensus" for any dialogue to resume [2][3] - The Chinese government criticizes the Democratic Progressive Party's stance against the "1992 Consensus," asserting that it undermines cross-strait relations and goes against mainstream public opinion in Taiwan [3]

Core Viewpoint - The recent poll indicates that 70.2% of the Taiwanese public believes that cross-strait relations have worsened in the past six months, while only 9.1% think they have improved, reflecting a significant public sentiment against the current state of relations [1] Group 1: Poll Results and Reactions - A poll by the Taiwan Research Center shows that 70.2% of respondents feel cross-strait relations have deteriorated, with only 9.1% believing they have improved [1] - The Taiwan Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) agrees with the poll results, attributing the negative perception to increased military activity from the mainland [1] Group 2: Government Commentary - The spokesperson for the Taiwan Affairs Office, Chen Binhua, questions why cross-strait relations were stable from 2008 to 2016 but have deteriorated since May 2016, suggesting that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) should reflect on its actions [1] - Chen criticizes the DPP for labeling the mainland as a "foreign hostile force" and for provoking tensions through its policies, which he claims directly contribute to the worsening of relations [1] Group 3: Call for Cooperation - The 9.1% of respondents who view relations positively are seen as supporting peace, development, and cooperation, indicating a desire for improved cross-strait interactions despite DPP's opposition [1] - The MAC is criticized for failing to promote dialogue and cooperation, instead being described as a catalyst for confrontation and division [1]

Core Viewpoint - Taiwan's Vice President Lai Ching-te asserts that Taiwan will never surrender if China initiates a unification war, indicating a strong stance against potential aggression from the mainland [1] Group 1: Political Context - The recent international forum on "National Defense Resilience" hosted by Taiwan authorities highlights the government's focus on defense and resilience against perceived threats from China [1] - The new security guidelines released by Taiwan's defense department reflect an ongoing effort to bolster national security measures in response to regional tensions [1] Group 2: Strategic Implications - Analysts suggest that Lai Ching-te's statements serve dual purposes: demonstrating resolve to China and rallying domestic support to maintain his political position [1] - The potential for Lai to create a crisis in cross-strait relations is seen as a strategy to enhance his chances in the upcoming 2028 elections [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need to analyze Taiwan's society through the lens of "official" (庙堂) and "civil" (民间) rather than the traditional divisions of pro-unification and pro-independence, highlighting that both sides are part of an established interest group [1][3]. Group 1: Civil Response to Military Events - The public reaction in Taiwan to the military parade on September 3 can be summarized as "civilian excitement, official silence" [2]. - Media outlets like China Times and CTi News provided extensive coverage of the military parade, reflecting a detailed and engaged public discourse [5]. - Prominent figures advocating for cross-strait communication and unification expressed strong emotional responses, with political commentator Qiu Yi describing the parade as the most spectacular and moving he has ever seen [6][7]. Group 2: Official Response and Criticism - In contrast to the public's enthusiasm, the official response from Taiwan's leadership was notably muted, with only a few statements from Lai Ching-te drawing attention [9]. - Lai's comments included a controversial reference to the victory in the Second Sino-Japanese War as a "ceasefire," which drew criticism from the opposition for being overly accommodating to Japan and ceding narrative control to mainland China [10]. - The lack of vocal support from the opposition party (蓝营) indicates a complex political landscape where few are willing to openly engage with the sentiments expressed by the public [10].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the contrasting reactions between the Taiwanese public and the political elite regarding the recent military parade in mainland China, with the public showing enthusiasm while the political leaders remain largely silent [2][8] - The Taiwanese public is increasingly open to the future development of cross-strait relations, moving beyond traditional divisions of pro-unification and pro-independence [3][4] - Media outlets such as China Times and CTi News provided extensive coverage of the military parade, reflecting a strong interest in the event among the public [5] Group 2 - Prominent figures advocating for cross-strait exchanges expressed strong emotions about the parade, with political commentator Qiu Yi describing it as a deeply moving experience that instilled pride in being Chinese [6] - Expert opinions highlighted the military capabilities showcased during the parade, with notable features including advancements in unmanned and AI technology, improved stealth capabilities, and enhanced nuclear strike capabilities [7] - In stark contrast, the political elite in Taiwan, particularly the leadership, exhibited minimal response, with only notable comments from Lai Ching-te, who faced criticism for his remarks regarding Japan and the lack of direct commentary on the parade [9][10]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of remembering and commemorating the shared history of the Chinese people's resistance against Japanese invasion, particularly highlighting the significance of the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Anti-Japanese War and Taiwan's recovery [1][4]. Group 1: Historical Significance - The article discusses the historical context of the Battle of Changsha, where Chinese forces successfully defended against Japanese troops, earning international recognition [1]. - It notes that over 50,000 Taiwanese individuals participated in the national resistance during the Anti-Japanese War, showcasing a strong sense of patriotism and unity [3][4]. Group 2: Cultural Exchange and Memory - The article highlights the role of the Yingzhu Mountain Anti-Japanese War Memorial Park as a significant site for cross-strait exchanges, where both mainland and Taiwanese people can reflect on their shared history [3]. - It mentions various commemorative activities planned for the 80th anniversary, including exhibitions and cultural events aimed at fostering a sense of unity and shared memory among the youth from both sides [4][5]. Group 3: Youth Engagement - The article points out that younger generations in Taiwan have limited knowledge of their historical context, emphasizing the need for media and educational initiatives to raise awareness about their heritage [3]. - It stresses that remembering the shared history can positively impact cross-strait relations and encourage a collective aspiration for peaceful reunification [4].

陈斌华指出，民进党当局昧于事实，信口雌黄，一再兜售两岸"互不隶属"的谬论、谎言，只会加剧台海 形势紧张，只会破坏台海和平，只会给台湾同胞带来深重灾祸。不管他们说什么、做什么，都改变不了 台湾是中国领土不可分割的一部分的事实，都阻挡不了祖国必然统一的大势。 国台办：民进党当局一再兜售两岸"互不隶属"的谬论 只会给台湾同胞带来深重灾祸 智通财经7月30日电，据央视新闻，针对赖清德在所谓"团结十讲"中的谬论，以及陆委会近期的相关论 调，在今天国务院台办举行的例行新闻发布会上，发言人陈斌华表示，台湾问题的历史经纬清清楚楚， 台湾是中国一部分的法理事实明明白白。赖清德的谬论既没有历史法理依据，也不符合客观事实。1949 年10月1日，中华人民共和国中央人民政府宣告成立，取代中华民国政府成为代表全中国的唯一合法政 府。这是在中国这一国际法主体没有发生变化情况下的政权更替，中国的主权和固有领土疆域没有改 变，中华人民共和国政府理所当然地完全享有和行使中国的主权，其中包括对台湾的主权。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article reflects on the historical experiences of Taiwanese individuals during the revolutionary period in mainland China, highlighting the personal stories of Lin Tianmin's parents and their contributions to the revolutionary cause [1][3][6]. Group 1: Historical Context - Lin Tianmin's parents were born in Taiwan during Japanese rule, where they were treated as "second-class citizens" [3]. - The couple moved to mainland China in 1943 to participate in the anti-Japanese war, initially working in a hospital in Taiyuan [3][6]. - They changed their names to express their longing for peace while working with the Eighth Route Army [3][6]. Group 2: Personal Contributions - Lin Tianmin's father, Lin Sipin, served as a surgeon at the International Peace Hospital, performing surgeries under challenging conditions [6]. - Lin Tianmin's mother, Lu Li, contributed by teaching cultural classes and writing propaganda slogans [6]. - The couple supported each other through the hardships of war, demonstrating a strong bond amidst adversity [6]. Group 3: Legacy and Reflection - Lin Tianmin created a photo album titled "A Century of Lin Sipin" to honor his father's legacy, reflecting on the family's history and the impact of separation from relatives [7]. - He expressed concern over the current historical education in Taiwan, emphasizing the importance of understanding past experiences to prevent the repetition of historical tragedies [9].

Core Viewpoint - The Ministry of National Defense emphasizes that Taiwan is an integral part of China and rejects the notion of a "median line" in the Taiwan Strait, asserting that recent adjustments to air routes are routine and beneficial for cross-strait relations [1] Group 1: Cross-Strait Relations - The establishment and activation of the M503 air route is described as a regular operation by relevant authorities aimed at civil aviation development, which is beneficial for both sides of the Taiwan Strait [1] - The Ministry criticizes the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) for using the air route adjustments to create a narrative of military threat from the mainland, suggesting that this is an attempt to incite fear and increase tensions [1] Group 2: Political Context - The current tensions in cross-strait relations are attributed to the DPP's collusion with external forces and their ongoing provocations for independence [1] - The Ministry calls on the Taiwanese public to recognize the dangers of the DPP's independence agenda and to oppose separatist actions in order to maintain peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait [1]

Group 1 - The Chinese government has placed eight Taiwanese entities on an export control list due to their alleged cooperation with "Taiwan independence" forces, prohibiting the export of dual-use items to these companies [1][2] - The listed companies include major players in Taiwan's defense technology, aerospace, drone production, shipbuilding, and ballistic protection equipment sectors, indicating a significant impact on these industries [2] - Taiwan imports approximately NT$600 billion (around US$20 billion) worth of rare earth materials annually, some of which come from mainland China and may be used for military purposes, highlighting the strategic importance of these materials in the current geopolitical context [2] Group 2 - The Chinese government views this export control as a necessary measure to safeguard national sovereignty and territorial integrity, as well as a warning against provocations from "Taiwan independence" forces [3] - The action is seen as a response to Taiwan's previous technology restrictions on mainland China, particularly in areas like semiconductor design and AI software, indicating a tit-for-tat dynamic in cross-strait relations [2]