新华社记者马欣然 艳阳高悬，影珠山抗战遗址公园，绿意掩映中的抗战阵亡将士纪念碑指向蓝天，碑基正面镌刻着"倭寇 不曾留片甲，英雄驻此障长沙"。 沿途多处迫击炮阵地和布满青苔的石头掩体静静诉说着血与火的抗战历史。80多年前，长沙历经三次保 卫战，中国军队在影珠山奋勇杀敌，重创来犯日寇而享誉世界。英国《泰晤士报》就此刊文称："际此 远东阴雾密布中，唯长沙上空之云彩确见光辉夺目"。 今年是中国人民抗日战争暨世界反法西斯战争胜利80周年，也是台湾光复80周年。7月31日，"抗战胜 地、三湘新貌——2025年海峡两岸记者湖南行"联合采访团来到位于湖南省长沙市长沙县的影珠山抗战 遗址和史实陈列馆，共忆抗战历史，共话民族复兴。 "绝不让日本人前进一步！"在长沙保卫战影珠山抗战史实陈列馆，97岁的抗战老兵余炳纯精神矍铄，铿 锵有力地讲道，"那时没有空军没有海军，拼的是肉搏。我所在的后卫队，是最后一道防线，人人都抱 定必死的决心，只要前面打完我们就立刻顶上。" 香港中评社记者陈思远将这段珍贵的口述历史保留在镜头中。她认为影珠山见证了中华民族抗击日本侵 略者的英勇事迹，是一块浸染英雄热血的历史之地。 重温民族记忆 凝聚和平力量 民 ...

陈斌华指出，民进党当局昧于事实，信口雌黄，一再兜售两岸"互不隶属"的谬论、谎言，只会加剧台海 形势紧张，只会破坏台海和平，只会给台湾同胞带来深重灾祸。不管他们说什么、做什么，都改变不了 台湾是中国领土不可分割的一部分的事实，都阻挡不了祖国必然统一的大势。 国台办：民进党当局一再兜售两岸"互不隶属"的谬论 只会给台湾同胞带来深重灾祸 智通财经7月30日电，据央视新闻，针对赖清德在所谓"团结十讲"中的谬论，以及陆委会近期的相关论 调，在今天国务院台办举行的例行新闻发布会上，发言人陈斌华表示，台湾问题的历史经纬清清楚楚， 台湾是中国一部分的法理事实明明白白。赖清德的谬论既没有历史法理依据，也不符合客观事实。1949 年10月1日，中华人民共和国中央人民政府宣告成立，取代中华民国政府成为代表全中国的唯一合法政 府。这是在中国这一国际法主体没有发生变化情况下的政权更替，中国的主权和固有领土疆域没有改 变，中华人民共和国政府理所当然地完全享有和行使中国的主权，其中包括对台湾的主权。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article reflects on the historical experiences of Taiwanese individuals during the revolutionary period in mainland China, highlighting the personal stories of Lin Tianmin's parents and their contributions to the revolutionary cause [1][3][6]. Group 1: Historical Context - Lin Tianmin's parents were born in Taiwan during Japanese rule, where they were treated as "second-class citizens" [3]. - The couple moved to mainland China in 1943 to participate in the anti-Japanese war, initially working in a hospital in Taiyuan [3][6]. - They changed their names to express their longing for peace while working with the Eighth Route Army [3][6]. Group 2: Personal Contributions - Lin Tianmin's father, Lin Sipin, served as a surgeon at the International Peace Hospital, performing surgeries under challenging conditions [6]. - Lin Tianmin's mother, Lu Li, contributed by teaching cultural classes and writing propaganda slogans [6]. - The couple supported each other through the hardships of war, demonstrating a strong bond amidst adversity [6]. Group 3: Legacy and Reflection - Lin Tianmin created a photo album titled "A Century of Lin Sipin" to honor his father's legacy, reflecting on the family's history and the impact of separation from relatives [7]. - He expressed concern over the current historical education in Taiwan, emphasizing the importance of understanding past experiences to prevent the repetition of historical tragedies [9].

Core Viewpoint - The Ministry of National Defense emphasizes that Taiwan is an integral part of China and rejects the notion of a "median line" in the Taiwan Strait, asserting that recent adjustments to air routes are routine and beneficial for cross-strait relations [1] Group 1: Cross-Strait Relations - The establishment and activation of the M503 air route is described as a regular operation by relevant authorities aimed at civil aviation development, which is beneficial for both sides of the Taiwan Strait [1] - The Ministry criticizes the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) for using the air route adjustments to create a narrative of military threat from the mainland, suggesting that this is an attempt to incite fear and increase tensions [1] Group 2: Political Context - The current tensions in cross-strait relations are attributed to the DPP's collusion with external forces and their ongoing provocations for independence [1] - The Ministry calls on the Taiwanese public to recognize the dangers of the DPP's independence agenda and to oppose separatist actions in order to maintain peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait [1]

Group 1 - The Chinese government has placed eight Taiwanese entities on an export control list due to their alleged cooperation with "Taiwan independence" forces, prohibiting the export of dual-use items to these companies [1][2] - The listed companies include major players in Taiwan's defense technology, aerospace, drone production, shipbuilding, and ballistic protection equipment sectors, indicating a significant impact on these industries [2] - Taiwan imports approximately NT$600 billion (around US$20 billion) worth of rare earth materials annually, some of which come from mainland China and may be used for military purposes, highlighting the strategic importance of these materials in the current geopolitical context [2] Group 2 - The Chinese government views this export control as a necessary measure to safeguard national sovereignty and territorial integrity, as well as a warning against provocations from "Taiwan independence" forces [3] - The action is seen as a response to Taiwan's previous technology restrictions on mainland China, particularly in areas like semiconductor design and AI software, indicating a tit-for-tat dynamic in cross-strait relations [2]

Group 1 - The Ministry of Commerce of China has announced the inclusion of eight Taiwanese entities in the export control list for dual-use items, signaling a strong political response to Taiwan's pro-independence stance under Lai Ching-te's administration [1][2][3] - The listed entities include key military research and manufacturing organizations in Taiwan, involved in various sectors such as aviation, missiles, and naval vessels, indicating their significant role in Taiwan's defense capabilities [2][3] - The entities are engaged in both military and civilian applications, highlighting their dual-use nature, which raises concerns about their reliance on mainland components for production [3][6] Group 2 - The affected companies include Hanxiang Aerospace, which develops Taiwan's indigenous fighter jets and drones, and the Chungshan Institute of Science and Technology, responsible for various missile systems [2][3] - The response from Taiwanese companies suggests that they believe their military operations will not be significantly impacted, despite acknowledging potential effects on civilian operations due to reliance on mainland supply chains [5][6] - Analysts indicate that the export control measures are a clear warning to Taiwan's authorities, especially in light of recent military exercises and tensions in cross-strait relations [7][8]

Core Viewpoint - The spokesperson emphasized that both mainland China and Taiwan belong to one China, asserting that Taiwan is a part of China and that the relationship between the two sides is not one of "countries" nor "one China, one Taiwan" [1] Group 1 - The statement reinforces the fundamental nature of cross-strait relations, indicating that it cannot be changed or altered [1]

Core Viewpoint - The spokesperson of the Taiwan Affairs Office emphasized that despite the lack of unification across the Taiwan Strait, the sovereignty and territory of China have never been divided, and the fact that both sides belong to one China remains unchanged. The completion of national unification is a long-held wish of the compatriots and a matter of national significance [1]. Group 1 - The spokesperson expressed willingness to engage in extensive discussions and deep consultations with various political parties, sectors, and social strata in Taiwan regarding cross-strait relations and national unification [1]. - The statement reiterated the importance of the One China principle and the "1992 Consensus" as the foundation for promoting peaceful development of cross-strait relations and advancing the process of national unification [1].

Group 1 - The DPP administration under Lai Ching-te has heightened cross-strait tensions and undermined peace in the Taiwan Strait, being labeled as a "peace destroyer" and "crisis creator" [1] - Lai's refusal to acknowledge the "1992 Consensus" and his promotion of "Taiwan independence" narratives have led to increased division and hostility, impacting cross-strait exchanges [1] - The DPP's energy policy, particularly the push for a "nuclear-free homeland," has resulted in frequent power outages and rising electricity prices, with a reported five price increases in four years, totaling nearly a 50% increase [2] Group 2 - Recent large-scale power outages in Taiwan, including 35 incidents in April 2024 alone, have raised public concern over the DPP's energy policies [2] - The DPP's economic policies are criticized for neglecting public welfare and failing to address structural economic challenges, which could be alleviated through enhanced cross-strait economic cooperation [2] - The DPP administration's actions are seen as detrimental to the interests of Taiwanese businesses and citizens, leading to widespread dissatisfaction [2]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article revolves around the speculation that U.S.-China trade negotiations may involve Taiwan issues, particularly after President Trump's comments about "unification and peace" [1][3] - Trump's remarks during a press conference suggested that the outcomes of the trade talks would be beneficial for both China and the U.S., as well as for "unification and peace," raising concerns in Taiwan [3][4] - Taiwan's government officials, including spokespersons from the office of Taiwan's leader Lai Ching-te, stated that they currently have no information indicating that Taiwan-related issues are part of the U.S.-China trade discussions [3][4] Group 2 - Following the trade talks, China announced a significant adjustment to tariffs on U.S. imports, reducing the additional tariff rate from 34% to 10%, effective from May 14, 2025 [5] - The adjustment includes a temporary suspension of a 24% additional tariff on U.S. goods for 90 days, indicating a potential easing of trade tensions [5][6]