侵犯公民个人信息罪
Search documents
警惕“高薪兼职”陷阱
Zhong Guo Qing Nian Bao· 2025-06-19 02:23
Group 1 - The core issue involves a criminal network that illegally sold personal information of university students under the guise of high-paying part-time jobs [1][2] - The operation began in August 2022 when Zhang Qiang established a company focused on labor recruitment, which later evolved into a scheme involving the sale of personal data [2] - By June 2023, the network had recruited hundreds of students, collecting sensitive personal information such as names, ID numbers, and bank details, which were then sold for profit [1][2] Group 2 - The defendants, including Zhang Qiang and Liu Zhuang, were found guilty of violating national regulations by selling personal information, leading to their conviction for the crime of infringing on citizens' personal information [2] - The operation involved the creation of 594 Taobao accounts, which were sold to a third party, resulting in significant financial gains for the perpetrators [2] - The case highlights the importance of vigilance when providing personal information for job opportunities, emphasizing the need for individuals to read documents carefully and report any misuse of their data [2]
内外勾结非法获取客户信息,4人获刑
Ren Min Wang· 2025-06-13 01:11
Core Points - A commercial company employee engaged in secondary marketing by colluding with logistics company staff to obtain customer information through order placements [1][2] - The court sentenced the involved parties to prison terms ranging from seven to eight months, with a one-year probation and fines of 2,000 yuan each [1][3] - The logistics company discovered unauthorized data backup activities, leading to an investigation and subsequent arrests of the involved employees [1][2] Group 1 - The logistics company provided personal information to the commercial company in exchange for payment, with fees ranging from 4.2 yuan to 10.2 yuan per order [2] - The commercial company acquired over 20,000 personal information records from the logistics company between May and July 2024 [2][3] - The involved parties' actions were classified as violations of personal information protection laws, leading to criminal charges [3] Group 2 - The case was transferred to the local prosecutor's office for review and prosecution after initial investigations [3] - The court accepted the prosecutor's sentencing recommendations, reflecting the severity of the offenses committed [3]