近日，最高人民法院发布入库参考案例《吴某慧、陈某强等侵犯公民个人信息案》，为实施诽谤而非法获取公民个人信 息行为定性。 中学教师酒店入住记录被"开盒" 高三女生遭牵连 被害人朱某系江苏省某中学教师，被告人吴某慧系朱某的亲属。吴某慧在与朱某发生矛盾后多次向被告人陈某强提及此 事，陈某强提出可以通过获取朱某个人信息并在网上发负面帖子抹黑朱某。吴某慧遂向陈某强提供了朱某妻子的身份证 信息，以便查询朱某的个人信息。2020年5月，陈某强以人民币13150元的价格向被告人陈某购买包含朱某及陈某强前女 友杨某等人的住宿记录、民航、铁路购票记录等信息1442条。其中涉及朱某、杨某的住宿记录、民航、铁路行程信息299 条，其他与朱某、杨某等人具有时空交叉关联人员一般身份信息1143条。 其后，被告人陈某强将获取的信息发给被告人吴某慧，吴某慧从中挑选了部分与朱某同一时间段入住同一酒店的女性人 员信息（涉及在该中学就读、高考在即的一高三女学生等共计20余人），用于撰写帖文，后由陈某强修改帖文并支付费 用交由专门发负面帖子的邓某等人， 将诋毁朱某的不实帖文以多个吸引流量的夸张标题在知名网络发布。 帖子发布后在 上述网站迅速扩散，阅 ...

一、被告人吴某慧犯侵犯公民个人信息罪，判处有期徒刑十一个月，并处罚金人民币二千元。 二、被告人陈某强犯侵犯公民个人信息罪，判处有期徒刑一年，并处罚金人民币二千元。（其他被告人 判项略） 今天，最高人民法院发布入库参考案例《吴某慧、陈某强等侵犯公民个人信息案》，为实施诽谤而非法 获取公民个人信息行为定性。 基本案情 被害人朱某系江苏省某中学教师，被告人吴某慧系朱某的亲属。吴某慧在与朱某发生矛盾后多次向被告 人陈某强提及此事，陈某强提出可以通过获取朱某个人信息并在网上发负面帖子抹黑朱某。吴某慧遂向 陈某强提供了朱某妻子的身份证信息，以便查询朱某的个人信息。2020年5月，陈某强以人民币13150元 （币种下同）的价格向被告人陈某购买包含朱某及陈某强前女友杨某等人的住宿记录、民航、铁路购票 记录等信息1442条。其中涉及朱某、杨某的住宿记录、民航、铁路行程信息299条，其他与朱某、杨某 等人具有时空交叉关联人员一般身份信息1143条。 后被告人陈某强将获取的信息发给被告人吴某慧，吴某慧从中挑选了部分与朱某同一时间段入住同一酒 店的女性人员信息（涉及在该中学就读、高考在即的一高三女学生等共计20余人），用于撰写帖文， ...

Core Viewpoint - The rise of telecom network fraud and related crimes has led to an increase in associated crimes that support and facilitate these fraudulent activities, with the crime of aiding information network criminal activities (referred to as "aiding crime") being the most prevalent and complex type of crime [1] Group 1: Characteristics of Aiding Crimes - Aiding crimes are increasingly organized and professional, as demonstrated by cases where individuals set up "studios" to illegally provide technical assistance for fraud, such as unblocking internet accounts and fake registrations [2] - New types of aiding crimes exhibit stronger technical and covert characteristics, with cases involving advanced communication technology that supports telecom fraud, highlighting the need for stringent legal action against such crimes [3] - The interconnected nature of new information network crimes has led to a large-scale black and gray industrial chain, necessitating comprehensive legal action against both telecom fraud and its associated crimes [3] Group 2: Legal and Policy Approaches - The approach to combating aiding and related crimes is systematic, focusing on severe punishment for organized and professional criminal activities while also differentiating treatment for less severe offenders, particularly minors and students [4] - The implementation of a lenient policy for certain offenders, such as students involved in aiding crimes, emphasizes education and rehabilitation, with legal actions taken to prevent recidivism [4] - Future efforts by the judiciary and law enforcement will focus on intensifying the crackdown on aiding crimes and enhancing comprehensive governance to ensure network security and public safety [4]

Group 1 - The core issue involves a criminal network that illegally sold personal information of university students under the guise of high-paying part-time jobs [1][2] - The operation began in August 2022 when Zhang Qiang established a company focused on labor recruitment, which later evolved into a scheme involving the sale of personal data [2] - By June 2023, the network had recruited hundreds of students, collecting sensitive personal information such as names, ID numbers, and bank details, which were then sold for profit [1][2] Group 2 - The defendants, including Zhang Qiang and Liu Zhuang, were found guilty of violating national regulations by selling personal information, leading to their conviction for the crime of infringing on citizens' personal information [2] - The operation involved the creation of 594 Taobao accounts, which were sold to a third party, resulting in significant financial gains for the perpetrators [2] - The case highlights the importance of vigilance when providing personal information for job opportunities, emphasizing the need for individuals to read documents carefully and report any misuse of their data [2]

Core Points - A commercial company employee engaged in secondary marketing by colluding with logistics company staff to obtain customer information through order placements [1][2] - The court sentenced the involved parties to prison terms ranging from seven to eight months, with a one-year probation and fines of 2,000 yuan each [1][3] - The logistics company discovered unauthorized data backup activities, leading to an investigation and subsequent arrests of the involved employees [1][2] Group 1 - The logistics company provided personal information to the commercial company in exchange for payment, with fees ranging from 4.2 yuan to 10.2 yuan per order [2] - The commercial company acquired over 20,000 personal information records from the logistics company between May and July 2024 [2][3] - The involved parties' actions were classified as violations of personal information protection laws, leading to criminal charges [3] Group 2 - The case was transferred to the local prosecutor's office for review and prosecution after initial investigations [3] - The court accepted the prosecutor's sentencing recommendations, reflecting the severity of the offenses committed [3]