Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of genuine implementation over superficial actions, criticizing the tendency of some officials to focus on "labeling" their work rather than achieving real results [1][2][3][4] Group 1: Issues with Current Practices - Some local departments equate holding meetings and writing reports with actual implementation, leading to a superficial approach that fails to address underlying issues [1][2] - The "labeling" approach is rooted in a distorted performance view among officials, prioritizing appearances over substantive achievements [2][3] - There is a lack of deep engagement and problem-solving capabilities among some officials, resulting in a focus on superficial metrics rather than real progress [2][3] Group 2: Importance of Genuine Results - The true measure of officials' performance lies in tangible development outcomes and genuine public feedback, rather than the quantity of reports or the quality of labels [3][4] - Real achievements come from addressing challenges, building public trust, and delivering concrete benefits to the community [3][4] - The article advocates for a shift from formality to practicality, emphasizing the need for officials to engage directly with issues and communities to achieve meaningful results [4]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of genuine implementation and effectiveness over superficial measures, criticizing the tendency of some officials to focus on "labeling" their work rather than achieving real results [1][2][3][4] Group 1: Issues with Current Practices - Some local departments are more focused on appearances, such as holding meetings and creating reports, rather than achieving tangible outcomes [1][2] - The "labeling" approach leads to a superficial understanding of progress, where officials equate "talking" with "doing" and prioritize flashy presentations over solving real problems [2][3] Group 2: Consequences of Superficial Implementation - The lack of depth in implementation results in stagnation and dissatisfaction among the public, as the true measure of success lies in addressing real issues and improving people's lives [3][4] - The article argues that the public's perception is the ultimate evaluation of officials' performance, highlighting the need for genuine engagement with community concerns rather than self-serving displays [3][4] Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - To combat superficial practices, there is a call for a shift in mindset towards valuing substantive achievements over mere documentation and appearances [4] - The article suggests enhancing accountability and focusing on real-world outcomes, encouraging officials to engage directly with challenges and prioritize effective problem-solving [4]

Core Points - The opening ceremony for the 2025 autumn semester was held at the Municipal Party School, emphasizing the importance of work style construction in local governance [1] - Mayor Xu Shuhai highlighted the achievements in economic and social development in Zhenjiang, while acknowledging the need for improvement in work style to meet high-quality development goals [1] - Xu stressed the significance of learning from Xi Jinping's important discourses on party work style construction and the necessity for party members to uphold political integrity and discipline [1] Summary by Sections - **Work Style Issues**: Xu analyzed specific problems in the work style of Zhenjiang officials, urging a spirit of self-revolution among party members to enhance their political responsibility and effectiveness [2] - **Actionable Guidelines**: Xu outlined several roles for party members, including being clear-minded in politics, responsible in execution, courageous in tackling challenges, and diligent in professional development [2] - **Leadership and Training**: The ceremony was presided over by Zhang Juan, the Minister of the Organization Department, indicating a structured approach to leadership training for various levels of government officials [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the issue of formalism in the use of PowerPoint presentations (PPT) within certain departments, indicating that the focus on creating visually appealing presentations detracts from actual work and service to the public [1]. Group 1: Issues Identified - Some grassroots officials express frustration that significant time is spent on designing attractive PPTs instead of serving the community and implementing concrete actions [1]. - The tendency to prioritize presentation aesthetics over substance has increased the burden on grassroots workers, leading to wastefulness and a departure from a pragmatic work style [1]. Group 2: Government Response - The Central Committee of the Communist Party and the State Council have issued regulations aimed at reducing formalism and bureaucratic practices, emphasizing the need for substantial achievements over superficial packaging [1]. - The focus of these regulations is to establish a correct view of performance, promoting genuine efforts and practical results rather than mere presentation [1].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the issue of "formalism" in the use of PowerPoint presentations (PPT) within government sectors, emphasizing the need for a shift towards practical and efficient work practices rather than superficial presentations [1][2]. Group 1: Issues with PPT Usage - PPT has transformed from a tool for efficiency to a new variant of formalism in some departments, leading to unnecessary burdens on grassroots workers [1]. - Some localities have initiated special actions to reduce the quantity, cost, and burden of PPTs in public activities, receiving positive feedback from grassroots officials and the public [1]. - Despite these initiatives, certain units still evaluate performance based on the quality of PPT presentations, which can lead to increased workloads and a focus on superficial aspects rather than substantive work [1]. Group 2: Distorted Performance Views - There is a distorted view of performance among some grassroots officials, who prioritize creating impressive PPTs over serving the public and implementing concrete actions [2]. - This tendency results in wasted time, energy, and resources on unnecessary embellishments, moving away from a pragmatic work style [2]. - The article calls for a correction of performance evaluation methods, shifting from a focus on presentation aesthetics to actual accountability and results [2]. Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - To address the issue of formalism in PPTs, it is essential to establish a correct view of performance, emphasizing substance over superficiality [2]. - The article advocates for reducing bureaucratic formalities that do not contribute to work effectiveness or public interest, allowing officials to focus more on addressing urgent public needs [2]. - Digitalization should serve as a tool for practical efficiency rather than a means of perpetuating formalism, promoting a culture of genuine effort and tangible results [2].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the dialectical relationship between "acting promptly" and "persevering for the long term," which provides fundamental guidance for advancing initiatives and development [1][3][4] - "Acting promptly" highlights the importance of speed and efficiency, reflecting a proactive historical spirit necessary to seize opportunities in a rapidly changing world [1][3] - The urgency to act quickly is underscored by the need to respond to unprecedented challenges and opportunities in the current global landscape [1][2] Group 2 - "Persevering for the long term" stresses the value of endurance and strategic patience, warning against the pitfalls of seeking immediate results without considering long-term impacts [2][3] - Historical examples, such as the ecological achievements of the Saihanba people and the development of the Beidou satellite navigation system, illustrate the necessity of sustained effort over time [2][3] - The relationship between "acting promptly" and "persevering for the long term" is crucial for achieving high-quality development, requiring a balance between immediate action and long-term strategy [3][4] Group 3 - Establishing a correct view of performance is key to understanding the relationship between "acting promptly" and "persevering for the long term," as both are essential for high-quality development [4][5] - Current challenges include short-sighted behaviors among some officials, which can lead to ineffective projects and misaligned performance goals [4] - The need for a strategic layout that balances immediate actions with long-term goals is emphasized, particularly in the context of international competition and technological innovation [4][5]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of maintaining a clear mind among party leaders to avoid being misled by flattery and to ensure they listen to the genuine voices of the people [1][2][3]. Group 1 - Party leaders must avoid the "killing by flattery" phenomenon, which can lead to a distorted view of power and performance, prioritizing superficial achievements over substantial ones [2][3]. - There is a need for party leaders to recognize the difference between sincere advice and insincere praise, fostering an environment where honest feedback is welcomed [3][4]. - The article highlights the detrimental effects of flattery on political ecology, urging leaders to strengthen their party spirit and maintain a humble approach towards the public [4][5]. Group 2 - The article calls for a commitment to the principles established by the Central Eight Regulations, emphasizing the need for a long-term adherence to strict measures and a clean political atmosphere [1][4]. - It stresses the importance of cultivating a political environment that discourages sycophancy and encourages genuine communication between leaders and the public [5].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the issue of local government officials making impulsive decisions on projects, leading to significant waste and inefficiency, specifically focusing on the Yao Han Yang Shou City cultural tourism project in Guangxi, which has resulted in financial losses and public dissatisfaction [1][2]. Group 1: Project Overview - The Yao Han Yang Shou City project was initiated in 2018 with a planned total investment of 1.65 billion yuan, but only 540 million yuan has been invested so far, leading to a partially completed project with six out of eleven buildings remaining unused [1][2]. - The project was intended to be a part of Guangxi's "Double Hundred Double New" initiative and aimed to establish a health tourism demonstration base, but it has faced severe criticism for its lack of practicality and effectiveness [1]. Group 2: Governance Issues - The former county party secretary, Deng Xiaoqiang, was found to have made decisions without proper consideration of local conditions, leading to the project's failure and his subsequent removal from office due to corruption and misuse of funds [2]. - Deng Xiaoqiang was reported to have misappropriated 65 million yuan of public funds for personal gain and was involved in various illegal activities during his tenure [2]. Group 3: Financial Implications - The actual investment in the Yao Han Yang Shou City project exceeds the annual general public budget revenue of the county, which was approximately 400 million yuan in 2018 and has seen a decline until it stabilized in 2024 [3]. - As of the end of 2024, the total government debt of the county was approximately 267.59 million yuan, indicating a reliance on higher-level financial transfers and highlighting the financial strain on local governance [3].

Group 1 - The core issue highlighted is the detrimental impact of "performance projects" initiated by local officials, which prioritize personal gain over genuine community development [2][3] - The case of Du Yibao, a former village official, illustrates the consequences of such misguided initiatives, resulting in significant financial losses for the community [1] - The distinction between genuine achievements and "performance projects" is emphasized, with the latter often leading to wasteful spending and corruption [2][3] Group 2 - "Performance projects" not only divert funds from essential economic development and public welfare but also exacerbate the financial burden on citizens [3] - The prevalence of "performance projects" is linked to the abuse of power and corruption among officials, as seen in the case of Du Yibao, who faced multiple disciplinary issues [3] - True performance should be measured by the tangible benefits provided to the community, rather than superficial projects aimed at personal advancement [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of establishing and practicing a correct performance view among party members and cadres as a lifelong task, essential for implementing new development concepts and promoting high-quality development [1][2]. Group 1: Political Supervision - The political supervision focuses on ensuring that the decisions and deployments of the Central Committee are implemented effectively, with an emphasis on promoting high-quality development and ensuring that reform benefits all people fairly [2][3]. - A mechanism for precise and regular political supervision is being established to monitor the implementation of major strategies across regions and departments, creating a closed-loop system for discovering, rectifying, inspecting, and improving issues [3][5]. Group 2: Disciplinary Measures - The disciplinary measures are aimed at preventing the misuse of power and ensuring accountability, with a strict adherence to the Central Eight Regulations and a focus on correcting issues related to impulsive decision-making and excessive debt [4][5]. - Continuous efforts are being made to address formalism and reduce burdens on grassroots levels, with a commitment to holding accountable those who engage in wasteful or harmful projects [4][6]. Group 3: Work Style and Training - The article highlights the significance of maintaining a good work style as a guarantee for fulfilling responsibilities, with ongoing efforts to enhance the quality of governance and prevent the abuse of power [6][7]. - Training programs are being implemented to strengthen the capabilities of disciplinary inspection and supervision personnel, ensuring they adhere to legal frameworks and improve their professional skills [7].