Group 1 - The Japanese government, particularly Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo, has made controversial statements regarding nuclear weapons, which have been criticized by China's Ministry of National Defense as a provocation to the post-war international order and a serious threat to regional and international peace [1] - Kishi Nobuo's recent comments about considering the option of acquiring nuclear submarines have sparked significant public backlash, especially following previous remarks from government officials suggesting Japan should possess nuclear weapons [3] - The official responsible for the pro-nuclear comments, who is a close aide to Kishi Nobuo, has not faced any disciplinary action, leading to speculation that the government may be tacitly supporting these views to test public reaction and potentially shift Japan's nuclear policy [3] Group 2 - The sales revenue of Japanese department stores from foreign tourists has decreased by 2.5% year-on-year in November, attributed in part to a significant drop in the number of Chinese tourists visiting Japan [4] - The decline in Chinese tourist numbers began in late November, which analysts believe is a key factor contributing to the overall decrease in sales [4]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need for peace-loving nations to act against Japan's right-wing forces to prevent a resurgence of militarism and historical tragedies [1][2] - Japan's Prime Minister, Fumio Kishida, has mentioned the possibility of Japan acquiring nuclear submarines and not ruling out nuclear weapons, which raises concerns about Japan's military intentions [1][2] - The Japanese Ministry of Defense has reported a rapid increase in China's defense spending and plans to deploy mobile radar systems in Okinawa by 2026, which is perceived as a threat by Japan [1] Group 2 - Japan is reportedly planning to set a defense budget of up to 9 trillion yen for the fiscal year 2026, focusing on developing long-range strike capabilities and space operations, marking a historical high [2] - The spokesperson highlighted that Japan's actions contradict international obligations and its own constitutional commitments, raising questions about Japan's credibility and intentions [2] - There is a call for the international community to unite against Japan's right-wing forces and to uphold the outcomes of World War II and the post-war international order to maintain global and regional peace [2]

Core Viewpoint - The proposal for Japan to develop nuclear weapons has sparked strong reactions domestically and from neighboring countries, particularly China, highlighting a resurgence of militaristic sentiments among Japanese right-wing politicians [1][3]. Group 1: Political Context - A core official from the Japanese Prime Minister's office suggested the development of nuclear weapons, leading to significant media coverage and public concern [1]. - Former high-ranking officials from Japan's Self-Defense Forces have defended the idea of nuclear armament, using rhetoric that stirs fear regarding China and the United States [1][3]. - The actions of these officials are seen as part of a broader strategy by right-wing politicians to revive militarism in Japan by fabricating threats [3]. Group 2: Reactions and Responses - Japanese social media has seen a rise in right-wing supporters promoting narratives that exaggerate threats from China, including claims that China has nuclear weapons aimed at Japan [3]. - Rational voices in Japan are working to expose the dangerous political manipulations by right-wing factions, emphasizing the need for a balanced perspective [7]. - China has consistently clarified its nuclear policy, asserting that it maintains a defensive posture and does not engage in an arms race, countering claims about its nuclear capabilities [7]. Group 3: International Implications - The international community is urged to form a unified response to Japan's nuclear ambitions, with calls for monitoring mechanisms to prevent potential nuclear activities [9]. - There is a warning against underestimating the international resolve to uphold nuclear non-proliferation, emphasizing that any attempts by Japan to challenge post-war international order could lead to severe consequences [9].

Core Viewpoint - A senior security official from the Japanese Prime Minister's office has stated that Japan should possess nuclear weapons, which has sparked strong condemnation from nuclear bomb victim groups and anti-nuclear organizations in Japan [1][2] Group 1: Reactions from Victim Groups - Seven nuclear bomb victim groups from Hiroshima held a press conference expressing anger over the official's remarks, stating that it undermines Japan's progress as a "peaceful nation" over the past 80 years and that Japan's non-nuclear stance must be reaffirmed [1] - The chairman of the Hiroshima Atomic Bomb Victims Association urged Japan to adhere to the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" (not possessing, not producing, and not allowing the entry of nuclear weapons) [1] - Another victim group issued a statement rejecting the remarks, emphasizing that they negate the Three Non-Nuclear Principles and undermine Japan's role within the Non-Proliferation Treaty framework, calling for Japan to legislate its non-nuclear stance [1] Group 2: Statements from Civil Organizations - The Hiroshima Alliance for the Abolition of Nuclear Weapons condemned the official's comments, asserting that anyone who genuinely listens to the voices of nuclear bomb victims would never make such statements [1] - The Hiroshima Conference for the Prohibition of Atomic and Hydrogen Bombs submitted a protest letter to the Japanese government, demanding the retraction of the official's comments and the dismissal of the official [1] Group 3: International Response - The Chinese Foreign Ministry expressed shock at the remarks from the Japanese official, labeling them as a blatant provocation against the post-war international order and the nuclear non-proliferation system, posing a serious threat to regional and international peace and stability [2] - The ministry emphasized that such statements are a complete departure from Japan's claimed path of "peaceful development" and should not be dismissed as mere personal opinions, urging the international community to remain vigilant and firmly oppose such views [2]

近日，日本政坛再次传出令人惊愕的杂音。高市内阁一名负责安保政策的高官竟向媒体宣称"日本应该 拥有核武器"，日本防卫大臣在谈及"无核三原则"时也声称"不排除任何选项"。联系到近来日本政要不 断放风挑战核政策禁区，显然这并非孤立现象，而是日本右翼势力精心策划的一场政治试探。必须清醒 地认识到，日本右翼势力的拥核野心已不再是阴暗角落里的窃窃私语，而是不再掩饰的"司马昭之心"。 尽管日本官员有关拥核言论在国内遭遇严厉批评，在国际上也引发了广泛的忧虑，但面对日本日益膨胀 的军事野心，国际社会的反应不能止步于外交谴责和舆论施压。历史的教训告诉我们，对于至今未能彻 底反省侵略历史的国家，任何形式的姑息都可能酿成大祸。当务之急，是全球爱好和平的力量必须行动 起来，将日本的拥核野心彻底锁死在萌芽之中。 日本右翼的"拥核论"由来已久，是其谋求摆脱"战后体制"、成为不择手段的"能战国家"的一环。随着日 本政治右倾化不断加剧，日本政府嘴上虽然坚持"不拥有、不制造、不运进核武器"的"无核三原则"，但 实际行动却是在谋求掏空这一原则的根基。他们正在通过"切香肠"的方式，一步步降低核话题的敏感 度，试图通过不断的舆论造势使日本社会民众逐渐 ...

转自：北京日报客户端 14年前，日本东北部海域发生里氏9.0级大地震，引发滔天海啸，直扑福岛第一核电站。电源中断、冷 却系统瘫痪，3座反应堆相继堆芯熔毁，大量放射性物质泄漏，这场核灾难迫使数十万人撤离家园。小 笠绫子的家，就位于核电站20公里辐射禁区之内。她随人群辗转迁居新潟县，本以为远离了核阴影，却 未曾想到，"新威胁"竟悄然逼近家门口。 据日本共同社报道，12月22日，新潟县议会通过一项补充预算案，正式为重启柏崎刈羽核电站铺平道 路。该电站横跨新潟县柏崎市与刈羽村，总装机容量约821.2万千瓦，是日本规模最大的核电站，也是 2011年福岛事故后全国54座被紧急关停的核反应堆之一。 日本政府及相关部门拒绝对重启时间表置评，但近期一系列政治动向令人忧心：首相官邸一名负责安保 政策的高官宣称"日本应拥有核武器"；防卫大臣则表示，在讨论"无核三原则"时"不排除任何选项"；而 首相高市早苗更频频释放"再军事化"信号。这些言行不仅背离日本长期标榜的"和平发展"路线，更是对 战后国际秩序与全球核不扩散体系的公然挑战，或将严重冲击地区乃至全球安全稳定。 "永远不能忘记福岛的教训" 事实上，核电站重启的准备工作早已悄然展开 ...

转自：环球时报 【#环球时报社评#：#国际社会应坚决阻遏日本拥核冲动#】近日，日本政坛再次传出令人惊愕的杂音。 高市内阁一名负责安保政策的高官竟向媒体宣称"日本应该拥有核武器"，日本防卫大臣在谈及"无核三 原则"时也声称"不排除任何选项"。联系到近来日本政要不断放风挑战核政策禁区，显然这并非孤立现 象，而是日本右翼势力精心策划的一场政治试探。必须清醒地认识到，日本右翼势力的拥核野心已不再 是阴暗角落里的窃窃私语，而是不再掩饰的"司马昭之心"。尽管日本官员有关拥核言论在国内遭遇严厉 批评，在国际上也引发了广泛的忧虑，但面对日本日益膨胀的军事野心，国际社会的反应不能止步于外 交谴责和舆论施压。历史的教训告诉我们，对于至今未能彻底反省侵略历史的国家，任何形式的姑息都 可能酿成大祸。当务之急，是全球爱好和平的力量必须行动起来，将日本的拥核野心彻底锁死在萌芽之 中。日本右翼的"拥核论"由来已久，是其谋求摆脱"战后体制"、成为不择手段的"能战国家"的一环。随 着日本政治右倾化不断加剧，日本政府嘴上虽然坚持"不拥有、不制造、不运进核武器"的"无核三原 则"，但实际行动却是在谋求掏空这一原则的根基。他们正在通过"切香肠"的方 ...

报道称，该组织由核爆受害者及市民团体组成。其副代表理事和田征子说，希望高市明确表态"无 核三原则"是国策并坚持该原则。另外，该组织成员伊藤和子说，日本政府内部在逐渐形成可以容许"拥 核言论"的氛围，令人深感担忧。 报道还称，请愿书中对"日本应拥有核武器"的言论提出强烈抗议，称此言论违反《不扩散核武器条 约》和《原子能基本法》，令人震惊和愤慨。 此前，日本首相官邸一位负责安保政策的官员向媒体宣称，日本应拥有核武器，引发多方批评。 中国外交部发言人林剑22日表示，中方对日本首相官邸高官、首相侧近公然宣称日本应该拥有核武 器感到震惊。上述言论是对战后国际秩序和核不扩散体系的公然挑衅，对地区和国际和平稳定的严重威 胁，对日本宣称"走和平发展道路"的完全背离，绝非"个人行为"可以搪塞敷衍，国际社会必须对此高度 警惕和坚决反对。 新华社东京12月23日电（记者陈泽安 李子越）据日本共同社报道，日本民间组织"废除核武器日本 运动"的成员23日向日本外务省提交致首相高市早苗和外务大臣茂木敏充的请愿书，要求政府方面明确 表态坚持把"无核三原则"作为国策。 ...

【环球时报驻日本特约记者 王军 环球时报记者 李萌】一名日本高官日前向首相高市早苗提供建议称， 日本应该拥有核武器，随后日本防卫大臣小泉进次郎又表示在审查"无核三原则"时不排除任何选项。日 本政府在拥核话题上接二连三的表态引发国内外对其动摇"无核三原则"的质疑。中国外交部发言人22日 表示中方对此感到震惊，"联系到日本媒体此前报道高市首相计划修改'无核三原则'，上述言论是对战 后国际秩序和核不扩散体系的公然挑衅，对地区和国际和平稳定的严重威胁，对日本宣称'走和平发展 道路'的完全背离"。发言人指出，这绝非"个人行为"可以搪塞敷衍，国际社会必须对此高度警惕和坚决 反对。 面对争议，日本内阁官房长官木原稔此前仅在记者会上表示日本的核政策没有改变，拒绝就日本官 员"建议拥核"言论发表评论。彭博社报道称，尽管高市早苗已确认政府将坚持"无核三原则"，但并未明 确表示在政府寻求改革防卫战略之际，对这些原则的承诺是否将保持不变。日本共同社称，自民党高层 指出需要就"无核三原则"展开讨论。 另据共同社22日报道，广岛县议会当天召开全体会议，就首相高市早苗拟探讨修改"无核三原则"一事， 全会一致表决通过要求政府坚持三原则的意见 ...

（来源：衢州日报） 转自：衢州日报 林剑指出，第一，有关言论严重违背日方应履行的国际法义务。根据《开罗宣言》《波茨坦公告》《日 本投降书》等具有国际法效力的文件，日本应"完全解除武装"，不得"维持能使其重新武装的产业"。日 本作为《不扩散核武器条约》无核武器国家，必须完全恪守不接受、不制造、不拥有、不扩散核武器的 规定。这些都是日方必须履行的国际法义务，绝非可以讨价还价的政治筹码。 第二，有关言论严重损害国际和亚太地区的和平与稳定。国际核不扩散体系是战后国际秩序的重要组成 部分，日本妄图拥核是对《不扩散核武器条约》权威性和有效性的严重挑衅，将破坏各国维护国际核不 扩散体系的共同努力，损害二战胜利后来之不易的和平与繁荣。许多国家明确反对有关言论，日本自民 党政要、朝野人士和民间团体纷纷表示震惊，认为绝不容许有关言论，应严格遵守"无核三原则"。 第三，日本右翼势力谋求"再军事化"野心昭然若揭。众所周知，日本多位前政要曾声称日本有能力制造 核武器。日本长期制造、储存远超民用核能实际需求的钚材料，是有能力提取武器级钚的无核武器国 家。如果日本敢冒天下之大不韪，挑战国际正义，试探国际社会的底线，我们绝不答应。近年来，右 ...