来源：雷湘平 美国AI这回彻底搞砸了，企业高管抱怨美政府：低估中国才是最大的败笔! 而美国这场对华科技围剿， 到底为何注定失败？ 这回美国人工智能研究公司（OpenAI）真是把事儿给办砸了！新模型刚一上线就被用户疯狂吐槽，气 得CEO奥尔特曼只能灰头土脸地公开认错，连说"彻底搞砸了"，忙不迭地把默认模型换回旧版。 【美企高管发出警告：美国低估了中国】 可谁都没想到，这道歉的话音还没落，就突然调转枪口开始大谈特谈"中国AI威胁论"，这甩锅技术简直 比他们家AI的智能水平还高。 奥尔特曼对着美国媒体一本正经地警告说，美国严重低估了中国AI发展的复杂性和严重性，这已经不 是简单的"你追我赶"比赛了，而是关系到全球治理格局的大问题。 好家伙，自己家新产品翻车了，第一时间不是好好检讨技术缺陷，反而急着把中国拉出来当挡箭牌，这 套路玩得也太溜了吧？ 明眼人都看得出来，这次新模型翻车纯粹是自身的技术判断失误。用户们纷纷抱怨回答速度变慢、语气 冷冰冰，还经常答非所问。 【美企渲染"中国AI威胁论"】 可奥尔特曼偏不老老实实承认错误，非要扯上地缘政治，把中国当成转移视线的"工具"。这种"自己不 行就怪中国"的套路，硅谷大佬们真 ...

捷克近年来的"强硬外交"政策，带来了令人痛苦的后果，特别是普通百姓成为这些决策的最大受害者。 过去一年，捷克街头的氛围发生了显著变化，商店物价不断攀升，能源费用让人感到巨大的压力，工厂 的订单消失得无影无踪，旅游业也出现了前所未有的低迷。人们开始质疑，为什么要让普通人承担这些 高昂的代价？ 这一切的起点，许多人将其归咎于捷克总统帕维尔。2023年3月，他在乌克兰基辅公开表态，支持乌克 兰与俄罗斯的对抗，并承诺捷克将继续提供军事和人道援助。表面上看，这让捷克在东欧反俄阵营中占 据了风头，但这种姿态的背后，却暗藏着巨大的代价。俄罗斯迅速采取报复措施，限制了对捷克的能源 供应，天然气和石油价格暴涨。家庭取暖变成了一种奢侈，很多小型企业因为无法承受高额的能源成 本，不得不关门歇业。布拉格街头的抗议声此起彼伏，市民们在质疑，为什么这些政治决策最终由普通 人来买单？ 然而，帕维尔的"强硬路线"并不止步于此。他对中国的态度更加强硬，令许多人感到震惊。捷克与中国 的贸易关系曾一度稳定，但自从帕维尔上台后，捷克的对华政策变得摇摆不定，贸易额直接减少了 20%。工厂的订单锐减，许多工人突然失业。旅游业也大受影响，原本频繁光顾布拉 ...

美国人越来越不恨中国了？皮尤最新调查曝光：年轻人不买政客账，关税反成政治笑话 美国皮尤研究中心最近搞了个民调，结果让很多人一脸懵：原来把中国当敌人的美国人，正在"悄悄"减 少。你没看错，不是中国变了，而是美国人开始醒悟了。 调查是在今年3月底做的，对象是3605名美国成年人。数据显示，把中国看作"敌人"的人，比去年少了 整整9个百分点；对中国"非常反感"的比例也掉了10%。这是过去5年来头一回出现"明显降温"的信号。 说白了，科技界、商界心里都明白：中国市场是机会，是出路，不是敌人。别再被那些天天嚷嚷"中国 威胁论"的政客骗了，骗一次可以，骗十年就没人信了。 最近中国电商在美国社交平台上火了，不少美国网红在视频里惊呼："在中国购物，质量一样，价格却 只要十分之一！"连这一点都让普通美国人意识到，中国并不是那个"妖魔化"的国家，反而是让他们生 活成本降低的关键一环。 为啥？因为他们发现民众不但没因为政府带节奏就更恨中国，反而对关税政策反感越来越深。52%的美 国人认为，这些关税对整个美国是不利的，53%觉得对他们自己都有负面影响——别忘了，这比2021年 变化大得多。 那时候很多人还觉得"跟我无关"。现在不一样 ...

Group 1: Soybean Industry Impact - Soybean prices have dropped to $10 per bushel, significantly below the $12 production cost, leading to a loss of $200 per acre for farmers [1] - The U.S.-China tariff war has resulted in a decline in U.S. soybean demand, while Brazilian soybeans have gained market share due to higher protein content and competitive pricing [1] - In July, soybean imports reached 11.67 million tons, the highest for the same period historically, with most imports coming from Brazil rather than the U.S. [1] Group 2: U.S.-China Relations and Economic Strategy - The tariff war is part of a broader U.S. strategy against China, which is often portrayed as a threat by U.S. politicians [2] - Former President's son Neil Bush challenges the narrative of China as a threat, highlighting China's economic growth and poverty alleviation efforts [2][4] - The U.S. has implemented policies like chip bans that have negatively impacted American businesses while failing to hinder China's advancements [4] Group 3: Perception and Policy Critique - Neil Bush argues that the U.S. is creating a false narrative of China as an enemy to distract from domestic issues [4][6] - He emphasizes that China's rise does not pose a threat to the U.S., as China seeks internal prosperity rather than external conquest [8] - The current U.S. policies, including tariffs and technology restrictions, are seen as harmful to both U.S. interests and global stability [6][8] Group 4: Call for Understanding - Neil Bush calls for Americans to visit China to gain a true understanding of the country, rather than relying on political rhetoric [10] - He stresses the importance of positive interaction between the U.S. and China, as both are major global economies [10]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the strengthening of defense and economic cooperation between the Philippines and India, marked by President Marcos's visit to India and the signing of multiple agreements [1][2][3] - The visit coincides with the 75th anniversary of diplomatic relations between the two countries, and it is noted that Marcos is the first Philippine president to visit India since 2007 [1] - The Philippines is expected to sign at least six agreements covering various fields, including legal, cultural, scientific, and technological cooperation, with a focus on expanding maritime collaboration [1] Group 2 - The articles discuss the regional security challenges faced by both India and the Philippines, emphasizing their strategic coordination under India's "Act East" policy and the "Maha Sagar Vision" [2] - The defense relationship has notably strengthened, with the Philippines purchasing the BrahMos supersonic cruise missile system from India for $375 million in 2022, marking India's first export of this system [2] - Joint naval exercises between the Indian Navy and the Philippine Navy are taking place near the Scarborough Shoal, which are perceived as part of India's efforts to enhance its military presence in Southeast Asia [2] Group 3 - Analysts suggest that the cooperation between India and the Philippines may be viewed as a means to counter China's influence in the South China Sea, with some Indian media framing the joint exercises as a warning to China [2][3] - The Philippines' strategy to involve external powers in the South China Sea is seen as an attempt to elevate its strategic value and attract international attention to its security concerns [3] - The joint exercises are characterized as more of a symbolic gesture rather than yielding substantial outcomes, serving to bolster domestic morale and provide material for media narratives [3]

Group 1 - The FBI has opened a new office in Wellington, New Zealand, aimed at enhancing the capability of the US and New Zealand to counter China's presence in the Pacific region [1][3] - New Zealand's Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Peters denied that discussions between the two countries included any mention of China, emphasizing a focus on improving law and order in the Pacific [3][5] - Peters highlighted the importance of the new office in combating crime, drug trafficking, and substance abuse in the Pacific region, framing it as a positive development [5] Group 2 - The Chinese Embassy in New Zealand criticized the US narrative, asserting that transnational crime is a common challenge that requires cooperation among all nations, and opposing any targeting of third parties [5][6] - The Chinese government has expressed concerns over the US's zero-sum game mentality and its attempts to portray China as a threat, advocating for mutual respect and cooperation instead [6]

Group 1 - Timothy Haugh, former NSA director, claims that China is exploiting vulnerabilities in the U.S. defense system, posing a significant challenge to U.S. cybersecurity [1] - Haugh emphasizes that despite efforts from cybersecurity and cloud computing companies, there are overlooked areas that remain vulnerable [1] - He accuses China of prioritizing intelligence collection, stealing U.S. intellectual property, and preparing for potential attacks [1] Group 2 - Haugh references past operations like "Volt Typhoon" and "Salt Typhoon," promoting the narrative of a "Chinese threat" [1] - He suggests that artificial intelligence could both exacerbate these threats and help the U.S. develop new defense strategies [1] - Haugh is involved with Ballistic Ventures, focusing on identifying "synthetic media" used for foreign propaganda [1] Group 3 - Haugh was appointed as NSA director in May 2023 and was dismissed in April 2024 without clear reasons from the Pentagon or White House [4] - His dismissal coincided with political tensions, including actions from far-right activists targeting him [4][5] - Haugh plans to teach at Yale University and has joined Ballistic Ventures as a strategic advisor [5] Group 4 - Reports indicate that the U.S. is the largest source of cyberattacks globally, contradicting claims against China [6] - Investigations have revealed U.S. intelligence agencies conducting cyber espionage against Chinese tech companies [6] - The Chinese government opposes the politicization of cybersecurity issues and calls for responsible behavior from the U.S. in maintaining international cyber norms [6]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the current state of China-Europe relations, highlighting the complexities and contradictions in European politicians' approaches towards China, particularly in the context of trade and geopolitical tensions [1][3][5]. Group 1: Political Dynamics - European leaders, particularly Ursula von der Leyen, exhibit contradictory behavior by criticizing China while simultaneously seeking business opportunities [3][9]. - The EU's recent sanctions against Russia inadvertently affected Chinese companies, showcasing a lack of coherence in their strategy [3][9]. - China's response emphasizes a desire for a "comprehensive, dialectical, and developmental" relationship with Europe, indicating a push for mutual respect and understanding [5][10]. Group 2: Economic Interactions - The trade volume between China and Europe has reached a historical high, exceeding $800 billion, with daily trade surpassing $2 billion [7][9]. - Despite the significant trade relationship, the EU's "de-risking" strategy is perceived as a thinly veiled form of "China threat" rhetoric [9][10]. - The upcoming visit by European leaders is framed as a "consultation" rather than an "invitation," suggesting a shift in the power dynamics of the relationship [13][15]. Group 3: Internal EU Conflicts - There is a notable divide within the EU, with Eastern European countries seeking Chinese investment while Western nations prioritize ideological concerns [11][15]. - Von der Leyen faces challenges in balancing the interests of different EU member states, reflecting the internal conflicts that complicate a unified approach towards China [11][15]. - The article suggests that the EU's decision-making process resembles negotiating with multiple stakeholders, complicating the relationship with China [15][18]. Group 4: Future Outlook - The article posits that the future of China-Europe relations hinges on the ability of European leaders to engage in equitable dialogue and cooperation [17][18]. - Establishing a rules-based framework for interactions could mitigate future conflicts, while continued unilateral actions may exacerbate tensions [18].

Group 1 - The G7 finance ministers are focusing on "overcapacity products" from China, indicating a strategic concern over China's growing competitiveness in the renewable energy sector [1][3][4] - The G7's criticism stems from a perceived threat to their market share, as China's advancements in technology and complete supply chains have enhanced the cost-effectiveness of its renewable products [3][4] - Germany's call for action against "overcapacity products" appears to be a tactic to shift attention from its own economic challenges, particularly in light of potential U.S. tariffs on EU imports [4][6] Group 2 - Ursula von der Leyen's upcoming visit to China is seen as a potential opportunity to ease tensions, despite previous negative remarks about China's production capacity [6][7] - The trade relationship between China and the EU is significant, with China being the EU's largest trading partner, highlighting the mutual benefits of cooperation in sectors like renewable energy and digital technology [6][9] - The EU's recent protectionist measures could ultimately harm both European and Chinese businesses, emphasizing the need for a cooperative approach rather than a confrontational one [6][9] Group 3 - The success of von der Leyen's visit hinges on the EU's willingness to abandon its "China threat" narrative and recognize the importance of collaboration for mutual benefit [7][9] - The ongoing geopolitical tensions and economic challenges necessitate a stable partnership between China and the EU, which could be undermined by continued adversarial posturing [9]

Group 1 - The U.S. Department of Commerce announced a preliminary anti-dumping duty of over 90% on certain graphite imports from China, which are deemed critical components for electric vehicles [1] - The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs emphasized the importance of mutual benefit in China-U.S. economic cooperation and urged the U.S. to adhere to market economy rules [1] Group 2 - A report from U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee Democrats claimed that China is implementing a long-term strategy to replace the U.S. as a global superpower, enhancing its influence with developing countries [2] - The Chinese government rejected the report's assertions, labeling it as Cold War thinking aimed at suppressing China, and reiterated its commitment to a peaceful and cooperative foreign policy [2] - China called for the U.S. to adopt a correct understanding of China and to engage in actions that promote stable and healthy China-U.S. relations [2]