作为一个拥有漫长陆地边界与广阔海洋疆界、曾历经战争苦难的国家，中国对和平与安全有着刻骨铭心 的珍视。中国的国防政策始终是防御性的。我们加强国防和军队现代化建设，是主权国家的合法权利和 必然要求，是应对复杂安全挑战、履行大国国际责任的需要，是维护国家统一和尊严的基础，而非为了 寻求霸权或挑战任何国家。正如中国反复阐明的，无论发展到哪一步，中国永不称霸、永不扩张、永不 谋求势力范围。中国军队的发展始终以能打赢防御性战争、慑止冲突为限度，其军力增长与国家的综合 国力发展相适应，与所承担的安全义务和国际责任相匹配，而不是"对标"某个大国来发展。 来源：环球 当地时间12月23日，美国五角大楼发布的年度《中国军事与安全发展报告》（"中国军力报告"）呈现了 看似矛盾的叙事：一方面报告延续过去数年对中国军力的误解误读逻辑，炒作中国军事力量的"历史性 扩张"，贩卖"美国本土日益脆弱"的焦虑情绪，也就是说，把中国视为"挑战"和"对手"仍是这份报告的 主轴；但另一方面，报告强调，"在特朗普总统的领导下，美中关系比多年来任何时候都更加牢固"，并 承诺"与解放军拓展更广泛的军事沟通渠道"。报告的这种双重性，为审视当前中美关系的复杂现 ...

这是因为，日本毫不掩饰与中亚国家合作的地缘政治算计。一是着眼资源抢夺与供应链布局。日本将中 亚视为关键矿产的来源地，重点锁定稀土、铀矿、石油等战略资源，希望通过建立从勘探到运输的完整 产业链，将中亚纳入其"经济安保"的战略供应体系，以此降低对中国稀土依赖的结构性风险。二是着意 对冲中俄地区影响力。中亚地处中俄之间，既是俄罗斯传统重要战略区域，又是共建"一带一路"的重要 支点。日本试图通过"中间走廊"等物流通道建设打造绕开俄罗斯的运输路线，插足欧亚大陆腹地，配合 西方地缘战略布局，削弱中俄在中亚的影响力。三是着眼外交突围与内政需要。高市早苗政府因涉台错 误言论导致中日关系紧张，与中亚五国的峰会塑造"活跃外交"形象，有助于转移国内民众视线，为后续 推动修宪、突破安保限制创造有利的舆论环境，本质上是一场"内政优先"的外交表演。 其实，日本对中亚的关注并不新鲜。早在1997年，桥本龙太郎内阁就提出过"丝绸之路外交"的构想。但 20多年来，日本在中亚地区的影响力却始终有限。究其原因，一是合作基础先天不足。日本与中亚相隔 数千公里，既无陆地相连也无便捷的海上通道，物流成本高昂、合作效率低下。中亚五国在投资环境、 法治水平 ...

Group 1 - Canada's diplomatic strategy has shifted from containment of China to seeking cooperation, with Prime Minister Carney acknowledging China as an important strategic partner [1][6] - The economic pressure faced by Canada, particularly in the agricultural sector, has driven this strategic change, as Canadian canola exports to China have significantly declined [5][11] - The relationship between Canada and the U.S. is strained, as evidenced by Trump's immediate termination of trade negotiations following Carney's statements, indicating a potential rift within Western alliances [3][8] Group 2 - Canada's previous alignment with U.S. policies against China is now seen as a misstep, as China is a major trading partner for many countries, including Canada [6][12] - The potential for cooperation between Canada and China is significant, especially in agricultural and commodity sectors where both countries have complementary needs [6][11] - Other Western nations, like Australia and Germany, are also reassessing their strategies and relationships with China, indicating a broader trend of countries prioritizing national interests over rigid alliances [8][12] Group 3 - The failure of U.S. sanctions against China has prompted Canada and other allies to reconsider their positions, as they face their own economic challenges [9][14] - For Canada to successfully re-engage with China, it may need to lift restrictions on Chinese electric vehicles and adopt more flexible trade practices [11][14] - The current global landscape emphasizes cooperation over confrontation, with countries urged to recognize the importance of mutual benefits in international trade [14][16]

Group 1 - The Chinese government strongly opposes the G7 foreign ministers' joint statement, claiming it distorts facts and interferes in China's internal affairs [1] - China asserts that the Taiwan issue is purely an internal matter and should not be subject to external interference [1] - The overall situation in the East China Sea and South China Sea remains stable, and the G7 is urged to stop escalating tensions and undermining regional peace [1] Group 2 - China is standardizing and improving its export control system to align with international practices, aiming to maintain world peace and regional stability [2] - The notion of "China's overcapacity and non-market behavior" is dismissed as a false proposition that does not warrant a rebuttal [2] - The G7 is called upon to abandon Cold War mentality and ideological biases, and to refrain from politicizing economic issues that could disrupt international economic order and global supply chains [2]

Core Viewpoint - The warning from Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán highlights the heightened risk of war in Europe, the implications of military expansion, and the underlying tensions within the EU regarding security policies and energy dependence on Russia [1][3][4]. Group 1: Military Expansion and Security Concerns - Orbán's assertion that Europe faces the highest risk of war since the Ukraine conflict emphasizes the urgency of the situation [1]. - The EU is rapidly advancing military initiatives, including an €800 billion rearmament plan, which reflects a growing trend of military expansion among member states [1][4]. - The fragmentation of military resources within the EU, with multiple types of main battle tanks and warships, leads to inefficiencies and waste, undermining collective security efforts [4]. Group 2: Economic Implications of Military Spending - The rising military expenditures are straining national budgets, with France's public debt to GDP ratio reaching 113% and Italy's at 135%, necessitating potential tax increases or cuts to social services [5]. - Ordinary citizens are feeling the impact of military spending, as funds are diverted from essential services like healthcare and education to support military initiatives [5][6]. Group 3: Diplomatic Solutions and the Call for Peace - Orbán's stance against military escalation and his call for dialogue over confrontation reflect a broader sentiment among smaller nations that prioritize economic stability and peace [3][6]. - The need for genuine dialogue and negotiation, rather than unilateral demands, is emphasized as essential for achieving lasting peace in Europe [6].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent tensions within the G7 regarding U.S. President Trump's call for imposing tariffs on China and India for purchasing Russian oil, highlighting Japan's refusal to support this initiative and the implications for U.S. influence in global politics [1][3][10]. Group 1: U.S. Position and G7 Dynamics - Trump is pushing G7 allies to impose tariffs on China and India, claiming that doing business with Russia should have consequences [1][3]. - The U.S. stance is met with hesitation from other G7 members, indicating a shift in the traditional dynamics where the U.S. could easily rally support [10][12]. - Japan's finance minister publicly disagrees with the U.S. proposal, emphasizing that the rationale for tariffs is insufficient and overly simplistic [5][8]. Group 2: Japan's Strategic Position - Japan's refusal to support U.S. tariffs is rooted in its strong economic ties with China, making it impractical to sever relations over the issue of Russian oil purchases [5][7]. - The Japanese government is cautious about potential retaliatory measures from China, recalling past experiences from trade disputes [7][12]. - Japan's position reflects a broader trend among nations seeking to navigate complex geopolitical landscapes without aligning too closely with either the U.S. or China [8][13]. Group 3: Implications for Global Trade - The article suggests that the era of U.S. dominance in setting global trade rules is waning, as countries like Japan assert their own interests [10][15]. - The G7's internal divisions may weaken U.S. leverage in international negotiations, as countries prioritize their own economic stability over collective actions [12][15]. - Japan's stance may signal a growing trend among nations to adopt a more pragmatic approach to international relations, balancing cooperation and independence [13][17].

Group 1 - The Philippine Defense Secretary Teodoro will attend the 14th Seoul Security Dialogue in South Korea, focusing on geopolitical competition and strategic stability [1] - Teodoro has made several public statements recently, including derogatory remarks about China, particularly during events commemorating the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Second Sino-Japanese War [1] - The Chinese Embassy in the Philippines criticized Teodoro's comments, highlighting the historical context of China's sacrifices during the war and emphasizing the importance of mutual respect in international relations [1] Group 2 - The Chinese spokesperson emphasized the ongoing global trends of peace, development, cooperation, and win-win outcomes, while also addressing the persistence of Cold War mentality and hegemonism [2] - China proposed a global governance initiative at the Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit, aiming to build a more just and reasonable global governance system, which received positive responses from international leaders [2] - The Chinese Foreign Ministry warned the Philippine Defense Secretary against exacerbating trust deficits in China-Philippines relations and criticized his remarks regarding Taiwan as a challenge to China's core interests [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese Mission to the EU strongly refutes the comments made by EU's High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Josep Borrell, regarding China's stance during the "9.3" commemorative events, emphasizing that such remarks reflect Cold War mentality and ideological bias, which harm both the EU's international reputation and its own interests [1][2]. Group 1 - The Chinese Mission criticizes EU officials for their ideologically biased statements, claiming they lack basic historical knowledge and disrespect the history of World War II [1][2]. - The Chinese government emphasizes the importance of commemorating the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People's War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War, highlighting the participation of 26 foreign heads of state and government leaders, as well as over 100 foreign diplomats, indicating broad international recognition of China's historical contributions [2]. - The current international situation is described as chaotic, with a call for greater unity and cooperation, urging EU leaders to adopt a correct view of World War II history and rational understanding of China [2].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government strongly opposes and condemns the remarks made by EU officials regarding China's commemorative activities, asserting that such statements reflect ideological bias and a lack of historical understanding [1][2]. Group 1: China's Response to EU Remarks - The Chinese government criticizes the EU's comments as ideologically biased and historically ignorant, arguing that they disrespect the history of World War II and harm the EU's own interests [1]. - The commemoration of the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People's War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War is framed as a means to remember history, honor heroes, cherish peace, and create a future [1]. - The event was attended by 26 foreign heads of state and government, along with representatives from over 100 countries, including 19 European nations, indicating broad international recognition of China's historical contributions and a shared desire for world peace [1]. Group 2: Call for Cooperation - The current international situation is described as chaotic, emphasizing the need for unity and cooperation more than ever [2]. - The Chinese government urges EU leaders to adopt a correct view of World War II history and to rationally understand China, calling for the immediate correction of erroneous statements to mitigate negative impacts [2]. - The statement highlights that the actions of some EU leaders, who cling to Cold War mentalities, are detrimental to the EU's international reputation and influence, as well as to its own interests [2].

Group 1: Economic Misjudgments - The Trump administration underestimated China's economic resilience, with China's GDP growth rate remaining at 6.1% in 2019 despite trade tensions [1] - The trade war has resulted in hundreds of billions of dollars in additional costs for American consumers and businesses annually, leading to a significant drop in export orders from Midwest agricultural states [5] Group 2: Strategic Responses - China has demonstrated a strong willingness to retaliate against U.S. tariffs, implementing measures such as restricting rare earth exports, which are crucial for high-tech industries [3][6] - The U.S. continues to impose high tariffs on Chinese goods, such as a 1157.53% tariff on low-speed electric vehicles, despite the growing popularity of these vehicles in the U.S. market [8] Group 3: Technological Developments - Chinese companies have adapted to U.S. sanctions, achieving significant advancements in domestic technology, including the development of EDA tools and the C919 aircraft, with local component production increasing from 10% to over 55% [10] - In the first quarter of 2025, China's high-tech product exports grew by 39%, with AI chips and complete products seeing over 60% growth [13] Group 4: Global Alliances and Trade Relations - The Trump administration's attempts to isolate China have faced resistance from other countries, with Japan and South Korea expressing concerns about the impact on their industries [11] - The EU has moved to strengthen trade relations with China, planning to increase trade volume to $2 trillion by 2030, indicating a shift away from U.S. influence [13] Group 5: Strategic Reflections - The misjudgments of the Trump administration have prompted reflections within the U.S. strategic community, recognizing China's significant military and technological advancements [14][16] - The contradictory policies of imposing tariffs while seeking cooperation on rare earths highlight the confusion and anxiety within U.S. strategy towards China [16]