李峥 编者按：美国试图拉下一道对华科技打压的"硅幕"，国际舆论场近年来越来越多使用的这种描述，在华 盛顿当前推动的"硅和平倡议"中得到最新验证。"硅幕"本质何在？为何难成？本期"环球圆桌对话"就此 展开讨论。 李峥：中国现代国际关系研究院美国研究所副所长 张薇薇：中国国际问题研究院世界和平与安全研究所副所长 刘卫东：中国社科院美国研究所研究员 美式"硅和平"的明牌与暗棋 2025年12月，美国政府提出所谓"硅和平倡议"（Pax Silica），声称要把拥有全球顶尖科技企业或其他优 势资源的国家联合起来，以确保"供应链安全"等。在印度最近签署"硅和平宣言"后，美国一些政客和媒 体就此开启新一轮炒作。该"倡议"表面上是一份面向盟友与"可信伙伴"的技术合作宣言，实际却带有强 烈的地缘政治色彩。 "硅和平"的核心内容，一是聚焦半导体与AI基础设施，通过跨国合作搭建覆盖"关键矿产、能源投入、 先进制造、芯片、算力基础设施、物流"的全链条韧性产业体系。二是以"可信生态""去强制依赖"为原 则，推动伙伴在关键环节降低对单一来源、单一通道的结构性依赖。美方虽未明确提出，但中国显然是 主要针对对象。三是将投资、出口、标准与供应 ...

2月14日，王毅在第62届慕尼黑安全会议"中国专场"上发表主旨讲话《携手校准历史巨轮的正确航 向》。 全文如下： 尊敬的伊辛格主席，各位朋友，各位同事： 现今国际体系发挥作用不够的原因主要不在联合国本身，而在于一些国家放大差异分歧，追求本国优 先，热衷搞阵营对抗，甚至复活冷战思维。这些都破坏了信任的基础，恶化了合作的氛围，使国际机制 的运行举步维艰。 维护国际协调和合作，应当求同存异、合作共赢。世界本来就是多姿多彩的，各国社会制度、历史文 化、利益诉求不同，这是再自然不过的。有差异才需要对话和合作。我们可以相互尊重、相互成就，如 君子之交，和而不同。 回顾历史，无论是取得世界反法西斯战争胜利，还是化解国际金融危机冲击，无论是应对全球气候变 化，还是打击恐怖主义，人类事业取得的每一点进步，都是各国跨越不同、精诚合作的结果。让我们始 终牢记，团结就是力量，团结才有希望。 改革和完善全球治理，始终要践行多边主义。 很高兴再次来到慕安会，同大家一起交流。 过去一年，国际局势更加变乱交织，丛林法则、单边主义大行其道，人类和平与发展的事业走到新的十 字路口。习近平主席提出全球治理倡议，呼吁践行主权平等、国际法治、多边主义 ...

Group 1 - The article highlights a significant shift in global perceptions of China, moving from a singular understanding to a more nuanced and objective recognition of the country [1][3][4] - There is an increasing trend of foreign leaders and citizens engaging with China, indicating a growing interest in experiencing Chinese culture and lifestyle [1][3][7] - The narrative around China is evolving, with many countries recognizing China's economic resilience and contributions to global growth, countering negative portrayals in some Western media [9][10][13] Group 2 - China's economic performance during the "14th Five-Year Plan" period has been notable, with GDP surpassing 130 trillion yuan and contributing approximately 30% to global economic growth [9][10] - Despite external pressures, China's economy is characterized by strong resilience and adaptability, leading to a shift in perception among foreign nations regarding economic opportunities [10][13] - The article emphasizes China's role as a major global market and its increasing importance as an export destination for many countries, with retail sales surpassing those of the United States [15][16] Group 3 - The article discusses China's commitment to high-quality development and openness, which contrasts with the protectionist tendencies of some Western nations [6][10] - China's technological advancements and innovations are gaining international recognition, with foreign visitors experiencing the benefits of these developments firsthand [11][12] - The narrative of "China as a threat" is being challenged as more countries acknowledge the positive aspects of China's growth and its contributions to global stability [4][7][16]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government firmly defends the rights of its enterprises following the ruling by the Panama Supreme Court regarding the operational rights of Hong Kong's CK Hutchison Holdings at both ends of the Panama Canal, which has drawn attention from U.S. officials [2][2]. Group 1: Government Response - The Chinese government has responded to the Panama Supreme Court's ruling, emphasizing the protection of legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises [2][2]. - The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region government has also issued a statement regarding the court's decision [2][2]. Group 2: U.S. Reaction - U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio expressed satisfaction with the Panama Supreme Court's ruling, indicating a broader concern regarding Chinese influence in the Western Hemisphere [2][2]. - The Chairman of the U.S. House China Committee, Mike McCaul, stated that the Western Hemisphere does not welcome what he termed as "malicious influence" from China [2][2]. Group 3: Ideological Conflict - The Chinese spokesperson criticized the U.S. for exhibiting Cold War mentality and ideological bias, questioning who is truly seeking to dominate the canal [2][2]. - The spokesperson highlighted the contradiction of the U.S. claiming to uphold the rule of law while allegedly undermining international law [2][2].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the response of the Chinese Foreign Ministry to recent comments made by U.S. officials regarding the operation rights of ports at the Panama Canal, highlighting perceived Cold War mentality and ideological bias from the U.S. [1] Group 1: U.S. Comments and Reactions - U.S. Secretary of State Rubio expressed excitement over the Panama Supreme Court's ruling that deemed the Hong Kong CK Hutchison Group's port operation rights unconstitutional [1] - The chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives' "China Special Committee," Molinar, stated that the Western Hemisphere does not welcome China's "malicious" influence [1] Group 2: China's Position - The Chinese Foreign Ministry, represented by spokesperson Lin Jian, emphasized that China will firmly protect the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises [1] - Lin Jian criticized the U.S. for its actions, suggesting that they are seeking to dominate the canal while undermining international law under the guise of legal principles [1]

Group 1 - The Panama Supreme Court ruled that the Hong Kong CK Hutchison Group's operation rights at both ends of the Panama Canal are unconstitutional, which has drawn attention from the U.S. government [1] - U.S. Secretary of State Rubio expressed that the U.S. is encouraged by the Supreme Court's decision, while the Chairman of the U.S. House China Committee, Molinar, stated that the Western Hemisphere does not welcome China's malicious influence [1] - The Chinese side has responded by emphasizing the protection of legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises, and criticized the U.S. for its Cold War mentality and ideological bias [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government firmly defends the rights of its enterprises following the ruling by the Panama Supreme Court that deemed the Hong Kong CK Hutchison Group's port operations at both ends of the Panama Canal unconstitutional, while the U.S. expresses support for the ruling [1]. Group 1 - The Panama Supreme Court ruled on January 30 that the operations rights held by CK Hutchison Group at the Panama Canal ports are unconstitutional [1]. - U.S. Secretary of State Rubio expressed that the U.S. is encouraged by the Panama Supreme Court's decision, indicating a stance against Chinese influence in the Western Hemisphere [1]. - The chairman of the U.S. House China Committee, Molinar, stated that the Western Hemisphere does not welcome what he termed as "malicious influence" from China [1]. Group 2 - The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Lin Jian, emphasized that China will resolutely safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises [1]. - Lin Jian criticized the U.S. for demonstrating a Cold War mentality and ideological bias, suggesting that the U.S. is attempting to dominate the canal while claiming to uphold the rule of law [1].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government criticizes the U.S. for its Cold War mentality and ideological bias regarding the Panama Canal port operations, emphasizing the need to protect the legitimate rights of Chinese enterprises [1] Group 1: U.S. Reactions - U.S. Secretary of State Rubio expressed excitement over the Panama Supreme Court's ruling that deemed the Hong Kong CK Hutchison Group's port operations unconstitutional [1] - The Chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives' China Select Committee, Molinar, stated that the Western Hemisphere does not welcome China's "malicious" influence [1] Group 2: China's Response - The Chinese government has responded to the Panama Supreme Court's ruling, asserting that it will firmly protect the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises [1] - The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region government has also issued a statement regarding the court's decision [1] Group 3: Broader Implications - The Chinese spokesperson highlighted that the U.S. actions reveal a desire to dominate the canal and undermine international law under the guise of legal principles, which is evident to the international community [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government, through spokesperson Lin Jian, has responded to the ruling by Panama's Supreme Court regarding the operational rights of Hong Kong's CK Hutchison Holdings at both ends of the Panama Canal, emphasizing the protection of Chinese enterprises' legitimate rights and interests [1]. Group 1 - The Panama Supreme Court ruled that the operational rights held by Hong Kong's CK Hutchison Group at the Panama Canal are unconstitutional [1]. - U.S. Secretary of State Rubio expressed satisfaction with the ruling, while the U.S. House of Representatives' China Select Committee Chairman, Molinar, stated that the Western Hemisphere does not welcome China's malicious influence [1]. - The Chinese government criticized the U.S. for its Cold War mentality and ideological bias, asserting that the U.S. is attempting to dominate the canal while claiming to uphold the rule of law [1].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights a significant shift in global attention towards China, with several U.S. allies, including South Korea, Canada, Finland, the UK, and Germany, either visiting or planning to visit China, indicating a collective move away from U.S. dominance and unilateralism [2] Group 1 - Several U.S. allies are actively engaging with China, reflecting a pragmatic approach to international relations [2] - The shift in focus towards China is characterized as a rejection of unilateral hegemony and Cold War mentality [2] - The former strong leadership of the U.S. is perceived to be losing its influence in guiding its allies [2]