Core Viewpoint - The rise of internet platforms has transformed them into essential public infrastructure, shifting some public authority from governments to these platforms, which have become new centers of network power. The need for effective regulation and governance of platform economies is emphasized, highlighting the importance of state involvement in restoring the public nature of the online public sphere [1][3][8]. Group 1: Platform Power and Governance - The public nature of cyberspace and the private nature of internet platform companies are foundational to discussions on global governance in the digital realm. The control of information infrastructure by various ownership entities, particularly private ones, is crucial in understanding the dynamics of internet governance [2][3]. - The rapid development of platform economies is disrupting traditional governance structures, leading to a reorganization of network power. Platforms are not only influencing social knowledge and production structures but also financial and security frameworks [3][4]. Group 2: Mechanisms of Power Restructuring - In the digital age, platforms have emerged as new forms of resource allocation and organization, significantly enhancing their ability to integrate various industries and become super platforms. The shift from traditional media to platform-driven information dissemination reflects a change in power dynamics, where information now dictates power distribution [4][5]. - Platforms are central to the digital ecosystem, controlling social infrastructure and mediating between different groups, effectively taking on roles traditionally held by governments. This shift indicates a privatization of public authority, where platforms act as "private governments" [5][6]. Group 3: Alienation of Publicness - The rise of platform power has led to a structural transformation of the public sphere, characterized by a diverse array of network actors and blurred lines between private discourse and public affairs. This transformation has resulted in a more fragmented and uncertain public opinion environment [6][7]. - The commercialization of platform media has shifted the value preferences and discourse forms in public spaces, diminishing the traditional media's role in guiding public values and leading to a market-oriented shift in publicness [7][8]. Group 4: National Governance of the Public Sphere - There is a growing trend of integrating Western and Eastern thoughts in internet governance, emphasizing fairness and justice as foundational principles. Governments need to establish mechanisms to balance the power of internet platforms and ensure they fulfill their social responsibilities [8][9]. - Key strategies for effective governance include promoting mainstream media ecosystem reforms, enhancing legal frameworks for public governance, and ensuring platforms take responsibility for self-management under regular state oversight [9].

Group 1 - The "Fat Cat Incident" highlights the rapid spread of public opinion and the potential for online violence, emphasizing the need for internet platforms to establish rules to manage discourse and prevent extreme reactions [1] - The phenomenon of individuals exploiting trending events for personal gain undermines public trust in the authenticity and fairness of these events, creating a challenge for online governance [2] - The Central Cyberspace Affairs Commission has initiated measures to strengthen the management of "self-media," aiming to create a healthier online discourse environment through stricter regulations [2][3] Group 2 - Internet platforms are encouraged to take responsibility for managing information related to controversial events, ensuring that they do not allow individuals to exploit these situations for profit [3] - Recent initiatives by platforms like Douyin include the implementation of community rules to manage information related to unclear or controversial events, promoting rational judgment among users [3] - Collaborative governance involving platforms, government, media, and experts is essential for effectively managing controversial events and enhancing public trust [4]

Core Points - Yang Xiaowei, the Deputy Director of the 14th National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, is under investigation for serious violations of discipline and law as announced by the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection and the National Supervisory Commission [1] - He is the 16th senior official publicly reported for investigation by the Central Commission this year [1] Background and Career - Yang Xiaowei, born in September 1963 in Chongqing, joined the Communist Party of China in December 1984 and has a master's degree in engineering [1] - He held various positions in the telecommunications sector, including roles at the Chongqing Telecommunications Bureau and China Unicom, eventually becoming the Vice General Manager of China Unicom [1][3] - In April 2016, he was appointed as the Director and General Manager of China Telecom Group [3] - In June 2017, he transitioned to the Central Cyberspace Affairs Commission and the National Internet Information Office, where he emphasized the importance of correct public opinion guidance in online media [3][4] Recent Developments - In August 2021, Yang was appointed as the Deputy Director of the National Radio and Television Administration, focusing on youth protection measures against online addiction [4] - He was elected as the Deputy Director of the 14th National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference in March 2023 and stepped down from his role at the National Radio and Television Administration by the end of the year [5]